Tag: senate republicans
'He's Gonna Flip!' Democrats Predict Fetterman Switch As Weird New PAC Debuts

'He's Gonna Flip!' Democrats Predict Fetterman Switch As Weird New PAC Debuts

Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) is widely regarded as one of the most conservative Democrats in the Senate, frequently abandoning his party during key votes to align himself with President Donald Trump.

Now some political analysts believe Fetterman may ditch the Democrats altogether.

“He's gonna flip,” anti-Trump Republican strategist Rick Wilson posted on X on Thursday. Similarly former Rep. Conor Lamb (D-PA) posted on X that there was “another betrayal from Fetterman but look on the bright side, we’ll get Republicans to burn their money before Pennsylvania fires him.”

Both men cited a recent article from a publication that specializes in local news and pointed out that Fetterman recently created joint fundraising committees with a Republican from his own state, Sen. Dave McCormick (R-PA).

“First spotted by Politico on Wednesday, Common Ground PA was announced as a new joint fundraising committee,” wrote The Center Square's John Cole on Thursday. “Common Ground PA filed with the Federal Election Commission, known as the FEC, on Monday. They list four joint fundraising participants: Every Vote PAC, Pennsylvania Honor, Fetterman for PA, and Friends of Dave McCormick.”

Cole added, “Fetterman is listed as the leadership PAC sponsor for Every Vote PAC, while McCormick is named as the leadership PAC sponsor for Pennsylvania Honor.”

One Republican political consultant explained that it is highly unusual for senators from opposite parties to form joint fundraising committees.

“This would seem to be a very intriguing development, and a further sign of the close coordination on not just policy, but now political issues between Senators McCormick and Fetterman,” Christopher Nicholas, who also published the PA Political Digest, told Cole.. “What most is of interest to me now is who do they want to support through this new joint fundraising committee?”

This is not the first sign Fetterman may leave Democrats altogether. Earlier this month he defended the president who called him his “favorite Democrat” on a podcast with Logan Paul, who also identifies as a Trump supporter.

"Some Democrats now are actually running on the ‘f—— Trump' — I mean literally, that's in some of their commercials, you know, honestly," Fetterman told Paul. "And this idea — and if you call someone on their side as, like, ‘they're fascists,’ then that means that people that I know, and I love that voted for him, you know, that must be — they are fascists. And they are not. These are good people. They love our country no less than they do. It's just having different views and, you know, trying to find a way forward in a deeply divided country... I refuse to do that. People forgot that we're all Americans, and we actually need each other."

By contrast, in June Fetterman parted ways with Trump over the president’s then-negotiation with Iran. Fetterman, a staunch supporter of Israel, has supported American military action against the Middle Eastern country.

"Nuclear dust, that’s the reason why we’re here. This is why I was reasoned and OK with setting myself politically on fire to be the only Democrat for the last 90 days voting against these war powers acts. Presidents always talk about their legacy. At this point, if you cave just for political convenience, what kind of legacy is that?" Fetterman told Emily Jacobs at The Jewish Insider.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet


Endorsed By Trump, Georgia GOP Senate Nominee Made Millions Off Crypto

Endorsed By Trump, Georgia GOP Senate Nominee Made Millions Off Crypto

Georgia Rep. Mike Collins endorsed a ban on congressional stock trading while he was actively buying and selling cryptocurrency.

When a voter confronted Collins about this during an April meet-and-greet, he tried to claim that his activities were not corrupt because cryptocurrencies were immune from insider trading.

“I don’t know how you would manipulate crypto,” Collins said. “It’d be like trying to manipulate the dollar, the peso or something. But the stock trading, I don’t know how to do it … All I want to know is when people stop doing it. They’re getting insider information.”

Collins’ characterization is not accurate. While it’s true that cryptocurrencies are sold on digital exchanges rather than the traditional stock market, individuals can still use clandestine information to maximize their profits. Because cryptocurrencies are not securities, these cases are often prosecuted as wire or commodities fraud, as opposed to traditional insider tradinghttps://americanjournalnews.com/mike-collins-backed-stock-trading-ban-while-betting-big-on-crypto/.

In 2021, the House Ethics Committee fined North Carolina Rep. Madison Cawthorne $14,000 for promoting a cryptocurrency that he had a sizable stake in.

Many of the proposed bans on congressional stock trading, including ones that Collins has endorsed, would apply to cryptocurrencies as well.

Last month, Collins secured the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate in Georgia. His primary opponent, former football coach Derek Dooley, repeatedly attacked him over his cryptocurrency holdings.

“Collins treats Congress like his own crypto casino,” Dooley’s campaign wrote on X. “Georgians deserve leaders focused on service, not self-enrichment.”

This line of attack seems likely to continue into the general election. Incumbent Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff has made cracking down on political corruption and self-enrichment a major focus of his reelection campaign.

At the same time, President Donald Trump has come under fire for raking in $1.4 billion from his family’s cryptocurrency business. Trump has endorsed Collins’ campaign.

A Fox News poll from earlier this month showed Ossoff leading Collins among likely voters by 13 points.

Reprinted with permission from American Journal News

As Iran War Raised Gas Prices, Oil Lobby Sent Big Checks To Senate Republicans

As Iran War Raised Gas Prices, Oil Lobby Sent Big Checks To Senate Republicans

The two main groups responsible for electing Republicans to the U.S. Senate have taken large donations from the oil and gas industry.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) and the Senate Leadership Fund PAC (SLF) have received a combined $6.83 million this year from oil company PACs, executives, and trade groups, all while fuel prices rose as a result of the war in Iran.

During this same period, Senate Republicans facing reelection repeatedly voted to continue the war, helping sustain the huge profits oil companies were reaping from these higher costs.

“The reason why oil companies are doing so well right now, or at least are projected to do very well in the near term, is exactly because Americans are hurting,” Kelly Mitchell, who leads the oil and gas industry watchdog Fieldnotes, told the Guardian.

Since February, SLF has received $250,000 from Valero, $100,000 from Marquis Energy, and $2 million from Chevron. It also received $1 million from the American Petroleum Institute, the largest trade group representing domestic oil and gas companies.

Chevron is on track to make $9.2 billion from war profits alone this year. Valero’s stock value has jumped by 24% since the conflict began.

Billionaire Paul Singer personally gave $1.5 million to SLF and $310,000 to the NRSC. Singer’s venture capital firm, Elliott Investment Management, took over Citgo Petroleum earlier this year.

Former Sunoco CEO Sam Susser contributed $75,000 to the NRSC this year. Oil baron Philip Anschutz gave $150,000.

The $6.83 million figure also includes donations from individuals and groups adjacent to the oil and gas industry. Coal billionaire Joe Craft, for example, gave $100,000 to SLF. The value of coal increased as a result of the war’s destabilizing effect on global energy supplies.

“If your goal is domestically produced energy and you’re South Africa or Indonesia or China, coal looks pretty good from an energy security standpoint,” Jason Bordoff, the founding director of the Center on Global Energy Policy, told the New York Times.

Energy Transfer LP, which ships natural gas throughout the world, gave $500,000 to SLF this year. Semafor reported in March that the company will likely continue to profit from the war even after it ceases because of heightened shipping costs and the time needed for the energy supply chain to fully recover.

The American Exploration & Production Council, which represents independent oil producers, gave $100,000 to SLF. The group also received $750,000 from Koch Inc., the energy and oil refining conglomerate owned by far-right billionaire Charles Koch.

Republican Sens. Dan Sullivan of Alaska, Ashley Moody of Florida, and Jon Husted of Ohio voted eight times to block war powers resolutions that could end the war. Maine Sen. Susan Collins voted to block the resolutions six times.

Republican Reps. Ashley Hinson of Iowa and Mike Collins of Georgia, both of whom are running for the U.S. Senate, voted four times to block the House counterpart of those resolutions.

Collins and North Carolina Republican Michael Whatley have come under scrutiny for substantial oil and gas investments that enable them to personally profit from the war. Former New Hampshire Sen. John Sununu, who is mounting a comeback bid this year, has similar investments and has expressed support for the war.

President Donald Trump announced on June 14 that a ceasefire had been reached with Iran. Details of the agreement, which is expected to be finalized on June 19, have not yet been made public.

Reprinted with permission from American Journal News

Why Trump Appoints Temporary Flunkies Like Pulte To Top Federal Posts

Why Trump Appoints Temporary Flunkies Like Pulte To Top Federal Posts

When President Donald Trump appointed Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte as the new acting head of National Intelligence, critics were quick to ask what, exactly, a former residential homebuilder knew about international spycraft.

The answer appears to be “nothing.”

Pulte earned Trump’s favor after using his role at FHFA to launch multiple mortgage fraud investigations against some of the president’s most vocal critics, including Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and Federal Reserve Board Governor Lisa Cook.

The Government Accountability Office is currently reviewing Pulte’s investigations as a possible misuse of his office, but that didn’t stop Trump from elevating Pulte to an even more powerful position.

Pulte isn’t the only official Trump has shifted into a position of immense power after a conspicuous show of loyalty. In fact, more government agencies are filling up with acting officials than ever before, including the National Security Agency, the Departments of Justice and Labor, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and even the National Archives.

That isn’t an accident. Trump’s second term has been marked by the installation of acting officials to avoid the thorny process of Senate confirmation hearings—a headache Trump has been especially keen to avoid as his relationship with Senate Republicans crumbles.

Pulte’s nomination as acting National Intelligence director is a prime example of how Trump is exploiting the Federal Vacancies Reform Act to undermine the clear intent of the law and to evade Senate transparency.

Unlike other roles, National Intelligence legally requires confirmed directors to have “extensive national security expertise.”

Pulte, the owner of a home construction company with no background in national security or intelligence, certainly falls short of that bar. But as an acting official, he can exercise the full scope of his power—and carry out Trump’s personal wishes—without ever facing a single question about his lack of expertise.

Senate Republicans were already irritated by Trump’s ousting of GOP Sen. John Cornyn of Texas in favor of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who many of them find personally odious.

And when Trump’s rancid $1.8 billion “weaponization” fund was approved, Republicans balked at the thought of defending payouts to Jan. 6 insurrectionists during the heat of the midterm campaign season. GOP Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky denounced the proposal as a “slush fund to pay people who assault cops.”

Last week, Trump quietly abandoned his scheme.

The author of Trump’s $1.8 billion political landmine was none other than acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, another Trump loyalist chosen more for his submissiveness than for any hint of competence.

Despite only having the legal cover to hold his job for another 210 days, the White House is already hatching a plan to let Blanche—and other acting officials—remain in their roles indefinitely. So much for the Senate!

Under normal circumstances, Blanche would be required to leave the acting attorney general role on Oct. 29, which would set up a heated confirmation fight just five days before voters head to the polls. But if Trump “nominates” Blanche for the permanent job without ever moving his confirmation forward, the countdown clock would effectively stop.

That also explains why Trump has failed to nominate any permanent successors for the multiple roles currently being held by his hand-picked acting appointees. Trump is wagering that Senate Republicans, already beaten down by months of brutal polling and the prospect of losing both chambers of Congress in November, will be in no rush to have hearings for Trump’s nominees. He’s probably right.

In place of the transparency and accountability of public hearings, the American people will get only silence and excuses from a White House that long ago stopped caring about any opinion other than Trump’s.

As confirmed officials depart the administration and find themselves replaced with willing functionaries in active roles, Trump only tightens his grip on an executive branch that has increasingly become a weapon of his personal vengeance.

Trump’s demand for more control over the government may satisfy his lust for revenge, but it’s also alienating Republicans from the voters they’ll need to persuade if they want to maintain their congressional majority.

Trump’s slush fund debacle is a reminder that a government full of flunkies may make Trump feel powerful, but it’s a terrible way to get anything done.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World