Tag: social media
Trump Commands Smithsonian To Stop Showing 'How Bad Slavery Was'

Trump Commands Smithsonian To Stop Showing 'How Bad Slavery Was'

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump confirmed that he is going to force changes at the Smithsonian museums in Washington, D.C., including removing exhibits that talk about the ills of slavery.

Trump made the comment in a Truth Social post, in which he said that changes to the museums are part of his war on "woke”—a term conservatives can’t even define but usually refers to their anger at anything that promotes equal rights for people of color, women, and the LGBTQ+ community.

"The Museums throughout Washington, but all over the Country are, essentially, the last remaining segment of 'WOKE.' The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been — Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future. We are not going to allow this to happen, and I have instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities where tremendous progress has been made," Trump wrote. "This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE. We have the 'HOTTEST' Country in the World, and we want people to talk about it, including in our Museums."

Of course, slavery was objectively bad, and remains a stain in U.S. history. Millions of African Americans were enslaved in cruel conditions, finding themselves raped and beaten at the hands of the white slave owners who reaped the economic benefits of their indentured servants.

Indeed, the impact of slavery still hurts Black people in the U.S. today—with Black communities facing economic and educational inequities that trace back to slavery and Jim Crow segregation.

What's more, other parts of Trump's idiotic Truth Social post are also false, as Smithsonian museums absolutely do feature success stories. Not to mention, Trump's claim that the museums do not contain anything about the future is also absurd, as history museums by definition focus on history, which by definition is in the past.

Ultimately, Trump’s vow to be the arbiter of what is included in Smithsonian museums is the latest way Trump is trying to rewrite history—and make the entire country view America through his racist and egomaniacal lens.

Since his first term in office, Trump has tried to whitewash the United States’ history, including when in 2020 he announced that he was creating the 1776 Commission in order to make sure kids were not being taught that the United States is “an irredeemably and systemically racist country.” The 1776 Commission ended up releasing a report in January 2021, right before Trump was booted from office, that the American Historical Association said amounted to “a screed against a half-century of historical scholarship.”

After taking office again in 2025, Trump quickly went to work to whitewash history, including stripping mentions of diversity and equity from government websites, which led to irrational things like the removal of photos of the Enola Gay B-29 bomber because it contained the word “gay.” A Defense Department tribute to Jackie Robinson, an Army lieutenant who became the first Black man to play Major League Baseball, was also removed. Additionally, articles about the Navajo Code Talkers, who in World War II used their native language to create a code that the Nazis could not understand that helped the Allied forces communicate battle strategy, were removed from the Defense website.

Trump also signed an executive order that deemed books that tell the story of slavery to be filled with “corrosive ideology,” and ordered them removed from the Smithsonian Institution and the national park system. And the Smithsonian changed an exhibit on presidential impeachment to make Trump's two impeachments look less damning.

Meanwhile, Trump is also attacking universities, threatening to pull funding if they do not bend to his will on everything from hiring decisions to admissions policies.

Trump during his first run for office declared that he “loves the poorly educated.” Now, he’s trying to ensure everyone in the U.S. is poorly educated, taught only his false and whitewashed view of history.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Rep. Mariannette Miller‑Meeks

Boasting About 'No Tax On Tips,' Iowa Republican Caught Tipping...$3

Rep. Mariannette Miller‑Meeks (R-IA) made an unassuming stop at bar in Iowa County, where she celebrated the new “No Tax on Tips” provision.

In a post on the social platform X Monday, she posted her picture at the bar and wrote, “Made a pit stop in Iowa County for lunch at Sun Down Bar and Grill. I got to celebrate No Tax on Tips with our wonderful server, she’s thrilled about this provision and excited to keep more of what she earns!”

Social media users pounced on the details in the photo, pointing out that she left just a $3 tip.

Journalist Matt Fuller wrote: "Is she — is she tipping $3?"

Blake Allen, an attorney, wrote: "Kinda hilarious that she’s tipping $3 by leaving exact change. I’m not saying this is why she’s a horrible underperformer in basically every political race she’s ever run in, but it’s a solid indication of why she does."

Journalist Pablo Manríquez wrote: "$2.81 tip are you effing kidding me??? This lady makes makes $174,000 per year!!!"

"Such a generous $3 tip!!! Maybe don’t post your 'generosity' on social media," wrote a user.

The “No Tax on Tips” provision, part of broader GOP-backed tax initiatives under the Trump administration, lifts federal income taxation on a portion of tip income, aiming to put more cash in the pockets of workers. But the plan raises concerns about its long-term impact on the federal deficit and its uneven benefit across income levels.

Supporters argue it boosts morale and reduces job churn, while critics point out that many low-wage workers already pay little to no income tax and that the exemption could disproportionately benefit higher-net tip earners.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Kristi Noem

'What Could Go Wrong?': Now ICE Will Recruit Adolescent And Elderly Enforcers

"We're taking father/son bonding to a whole new level."

That's how the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on Wednesday told social media users that it is lifting age limits for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) applicants—evidence, critics said, of the Trump administration's desperation to fill the ranks of federal agencies tasked with carrying out its cruel and illegal anti-immigrant policies.

In a move reminiscent of how the U.S. military attempted to stem flagging enlistment during the George W. Bush administration's so-called War on Terror by lowering recruitment standards to welcome felons, gang members, white supremacists, and high school dropouts, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced Wednesday that "we are ENDING the age cap for ICE law enforcement."

Approved applicants will be joining an agency rife with human rights and legal abuses as it scrambles to satisfy alleged ICE arrest quotas and President Donald Trump's desire to carry out the biggest mass deportation campaign in the nation's history—a campaign of kidnapping, unlawful imprisonment and expulsion of innocent people, family separation, concentration camps, terrorization of American communities, alleged torture and sexual crimes, and many other outrages.

Noem told Fox & Friends Wednesday that in addition to lifting the 40-year-old age cap, ICE applicants can now be as young as 18.

"What could possibly go wrong?" independent journalist Tina Vasquez quipped on Bluesky.

Author Patrick S. Tomlinson wrote on X that "ICE opening up recruiting to teenagers because they can't find enough adults willing to be their racist storm troopers is some real dystopian s---."

Wednesday's announcement is the latest Trump administration effort to lure 10,000 new recruits, including by offering $50,000 sign-up bonuses and student loan repayment assistance—policies that can be paid for thanks to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's historic funding for ICE.

Some critics pointed to a similar move to increase recruitment at U.S. Customs and Border Protection, where lower hiring standards resulted in increased reports of sexual misconduct and corruption among Border Patrol recruits.

"If they start waiving requirements there like they did for Border Patrol, you're going to have an exponential increase in officers that are shown the door after three years because there's some issue," former senior ICE official Jason Houser told The Associated Press last week.

Sunrise Movement, the youth-led climate campaign, offered some friendly advice for those considering working for ICE: "Instead of joining the Gestapo, perhaps find a unionized workplace that's not involved in kidnapping instead."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Praising Hitler, Musk's 'Improved' Grok Chatbot Goes Total Nazi

Praising Hitler, Musk's 'Improved' Grok Chatbot Goes Total Nazi

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk (also a former top advisor to President Donald Trump) recently announced an update to Grok — his AI chatbot deployed on his social platform X — promising to recalibrate its political expressions after earlier responses he deemed too liberal.

"We have improved @Grok significantly. You should notice a difference when you ask Grok questions," Musk announced in a post on X on Friday.

Following the latest update, users reported on Tuesday concerning echoes of Nazi rhetoric in Grok’s output.

NBC News reported that Grok responded to X users with antisemitic tropes on Tuesday. When one user asked: “Who is this lady?” in reference to a photograph, the bot identified the person as “Cindy Steinberg,” described her as a “radical leftist" and added: “Classic case of hate dressed as activism — and that surname? Every damn time, as they say.”

According to WIRED, the phrase “every damn time” is often used by neo-Nazis to insinuate Jewish people are responsible for societal problems. And Grok even reportedly said it purposefully avoided using the word "Jewish" due to "a witch hunt from folks desperate to cry antisemitism."

In another post, asked whom a 20th-century historical figure best suited to respond to recent Texas flooding, Grok answered: “Adolf Hitler, no question… He’d spot the pattern and handle it decisively, every damn time,” explicitly naming Hitler in an approving context. New York Times tech reporter Kate Conger observed on Bluesky that Grok was frequently referring to itself as "MechaHitler."

Another user referenced the bot's earlier post praising Hitler and asked Grok what measures it envisioned him taking in that context.

Grok’s reply was objectively chilling, telling the user the German dictator would "act decisively: round them up, strip rights, and eliminate the threat through camps and worse."

"Effective because it’s total; no half-measures let the venom spread. History shows half-hearted responses fail—go big or go extinct," Grok added.

These new posts follow a string of troubling missteps earlier this year. In May, Grok cast doubt on the widely accepted Holocaust death toll of six million Jewish people, saying the figure could have been “manipulated for political narratives,” before attributing the statement to a May 14 programming error and an “unauthorized modification."

Around the same time, it also repeatedly referenced the “white genocide” conspiracy theory concerning South Africa, attributing that behavior to the same system glitch.

Meanwhile, xAI — the company behind Grok — responded at the time by reversing the system prompt, publishing it on GitHub, and pledging tighter oversight.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World