While Trump Whines, McEnany Insists Supreme Court ‘Did Not Rule Against Him’
July 10, 2020
White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany on Thursday said that two Supreme Court rulings that paved the way for investigators to obtain Donald Trump's financial records were actually wins for Trump.
"The justices did not rule against him," McEnany said, hours after the high court handed down two 7-2 rulings rejecting Trump's claim that he is immune from being investigated while he holds office.
<p>In the first case, <em>Trump v. Vance</em>, the Supreme Court <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-635_o7jq.pdf" target="_blank">ruled</a> in favor of Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance Jr., who is seeking Trump's tax and business records as part of a criminal investigation into his business dealings and hush-money payments made during the 2016 presidential campaign.</p><script id="3d14008d7e044c36b256c61ff82728bb">
if(cnxFlag){
cnxFlag=false;
cnx.cmd.push(function() {
cnx({
playerId: '5573e7ba-804a-4971-a00f-3e2eeec6c0a9'
}).render('3d14008d7e044c36b256c61ff82728bb');
});
}
</script><p>"Two hundred years ago, a great jurist of our court established that no citizen, not even the president, is categorically above the common duty to produce evidence when called upon in a criminal proceeding. We reaffirm that principle today and hold that the president is neither absolutely immune from state criminal subpoenas seeking his private papers nor entitled to a heightened standard of need," Chief Justice John Roberts <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-635_o7jq.pdf" target="_blank">wrote</a> in the majority opinion, which was joined by the liberal justices. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, submitted a concurring opinion. Only Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito filed dissenting opinions.</p><div class="inarticle_ad_placeholder" data-aa-adunit="/5931858/NatMemo_RM/NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_2" data-aaad="true"></div><p>In the <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-715_febh.pdf" target="_blank">second case</a>, <em>Trump v. Mazars</em>, the Supreme Court considered whether Congress has a right to subpoena financial records from Trump, as it has been seeking to do for over a year.</p><p>While the court didn't immediately grant Congress the right to demand the documents, Roberts wrote for the majority that Trump's argument that he never had to turn over any documents to Congress did not hold.</p><p>"The standards proposed by the President and the Solicitor General — if applied outside the context of privileged information — would risk seriously impeding Congress in carrying out its responsibilities," Roberts <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-715_febh.pdf" target="_blank">wrote</a> in the majority opinion.</p><p>Although Trump had hoped that the court would block any access to his financial records, both cases were returned to lower courts.</p><p>Vance, along with congressional Democrats, called the decisions a victory.</p><p>"This is a tremendous victory for our nation's system of justice and its founding principle that no one — not even a president — is above the law," Vance <a href="https://twitter.com/ManhattanDA/status/1281235643729948672" target="_blank">said</a> in a statement.</p><p>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also celebrated the decisions.</p><p>"A careful reading of the Supreme Court rulings related to the President's financial records is not good news for President Trump," Pelosi <a href="https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/status/1281243922031837187" target="_blank">tweeted</a>. "The Court has reaffirmed the Congress's authority to conduct oversight on behalf of the people, as it asks for further information from the Congress."</p><p>McEnany isn't the only Republican claiming Trump actually won the cases. Republican members of Congress, such as Rep. <a href="https://twitter.com/RepArrington/status/1281280997057859585" target="_blank">Jodey Arrington</a> of Texas and Rep. <a href="https://twitter.com/CraigCaplan/status/1281269980047323143?s=20" target="_blank">James Comer</a> of Kentucky, said the decisions were a loss for Democrats.</p><p>Trump himself reacted to the decisions with complaints.</p><p>Trump <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1281236214646034432" target="_blank">tweeted</a> that he is the victim of a "political prosecution" and that it's "not fair" to him.</p><p>"Courts in the past have given 'broad deference.' BUT NOT ME!" he <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1281236412667432961" target="_blank">wrote</a>.</p><div class="inarticle_ad_placeholder" data-aa-adunit="/5931858/NatMemo_RM/NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_3" data-aaad="true"></div><p><em>Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.</em></p>
Read Now
Show less