Tag: trump inflation
Barack Obama

Obama Laughs At Trump's 'Cheesecake Factory' Hysteria (And So Will You)

Campaigning for Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff and Democratic gubernatorial nominee Keisha Lance Bottoms in Atlanta on Wednesday night, former President Barack Obama had a jolly good time at the GOP’s expense.

I heard the president was not happy when I joked over the weekend that he’s got the White House looking like Saddam Hussein opened a Cheesecake Factory.

And listen … First of all, let me get this on the record—I am the father of two daughters. Do you think I could’ve survived their childhood without going to the Cheesecake Factory? I lived at Chuck E. Cheese, and California Pizza Kitchen, and the Cheesecake Factory. That was my jam for about a decade.

Of course the real problem is prices gotten so high, a lot of folks can barely afford to go out to eat. So you would think this administration would be spending time worrying about that. But that was the interesting thing about how the administration responded to the speech I gave the other day.

They did not dispute what I said about them being directly responsible for rising prices. They did not argue with that. They did not deny tariffs were contributing to higher costs for families, they didn’t say anything about that.

I accused this administration, based on the facts, that they were engaging in unprecedented levels of corruption. They didn’t say anything about that. The president wasn’t even mad about the Saddam Hussein comparison. That part didn’t bother him!

But he was very upset about the Cheesecake Factory comments. He took great umbrage. He said I didn’t understand the work of the artisans in the White House.

And they mobilized—this was, I mean it’s all crazy, but this is the really crazy part—they mobilized a whole-of-government response to that joke.

Not to inflation, but to that joke!

The White House even called the secretary of the treasury. This is the man who is in charge of the economy, the person who is supposed to be figuring out how to make your life more affordable. The guy who is supposed to be figuring out how to lower inflation and reduce interest rates. They told him he should hold a press conference in front of the Cheesecake Factory.

You all didn’t see this? This really happened.

And the treasury secretary, he happens to be a former hedge fund manager worth half a billion dollars, and he was out there in front of the Cheesecake Factory explaining how he ordered the delicious French dip cheeseburger, instead of the egg rolls.

Look, this is not something I ever thought of. I inherited this major financial crisis, I never called my treasury secretary, Tim Geithner, and said man you gotta go to Arby’s, order roast beef—no cheese, that may look elitist.

To everybody out there, including the press, I want you to understand this. This is what I mean when I say these are not serious people. They don’t have solutions to actual problems. So they’d rather have the media and you talking about the Cheesecake Factory. That’s the game they’ve been playing for the last two years.

Just keep throwing distractions out there—attacks, fabrications, phony outrage—and hope that you won’t notice that your bills are higher and your life is tougher. Except that okey-doke will not work this time Atlanta, because you know your prices are still up, because you pay your utility bills, you’ve seen what those are like. You know it’s still hard to pay rent, and pay for child care, and pay for health insurance.

And you know we need serious people who are listening to your concerns, who see you and care about you and have real plans to make your life better—people like Jon Ossoff, people like Keisha Lance Bottoms.

Uh oh, he said “umbrage.” Maybe we’ll get another three-day news cycle about how elitist that word is!

What’s particularly fun about that riff is that he’s laughing his ass off through it. It really is the dumbest thing possible, and it’s fun to see him laughing in the face of all those conservatives and their performative, insincere outrage.

And God I loved this:

He is legitimately funny:

And this, oh this …

I did a review of the Obama presidential museum a few months ago, and I noted how people walking past an exhibit of Michelle Obama’s dresses were asking, “Where is Obama’s tan suit?” Turns out, he gave it away a long time ago, and it still breaks my heart. I bet it would be a top-three attraction at the museum! And it warms my heart to see Obama laughing about it now.

Our side is truly more fun. It sucks that the dreary, dirge-like nihilism of the right resonates as well as it does with so many people. We need more joy in America.

And we certainly need more laughter in the face of right-wing idiocy.

Markos Moulitsas is founder and editor of the blogging website Daily Kos and author of three books.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


Trump in Georgia

'I Don't Give A Damn': Trump Keeps Telling Us Why He Loves High Gas Prices

It is absolutely remarkable how bad President Donald Trump is this campaign cycle.

Here we are, in an election defined by voter discontent with inflation and the high cost of energy, and Trump decides to literally tell everyone that he “doesn’t give a damn” because oil companies are raking in the profits.

Here is the full word salad, transcribed:

The United States oil and gas business is making hundreds of billions of dollars.

So, I said I wonder if I should say this. I’d like a little advice from my two people, my two big monsters, that are going to do so well, they’re going to be the biggest stars in the country in a week.So our country is making hundreds of billions of dollars because of what’s happened in the Middle East, because they’re coming to Texas, and they’re coming to Oklahoma, and they’re coming to Louisiana, and they’re taking that oil.

They’re making hundreds of billions of dollars, our country is, on oil. And then on top of that, we have Venezuela and we have Greenland, because Greenland has a lot of oil.

So we’re making hundreds and hundreds of billions—trillions—of dollars.

But my people said, please don’t mention that sir, because [mocking tone] people are paying a little higher.

That number is going to come way down, but what we’ve done for this country, making money like this country has never made before.

So I said, let me say it very gingerly, very softly, because someone would say, “he’s bragging about making money while people are suffering!” Because you are still paying lower than Biden and Obama, and they don’t have nuclear weapons. But they’re going to be coming, no I can just see the fake headlines, “President Trump is bragging about all the money they’re making money while people are suffering,” that’ll be the headline, but I said I don’t give a damn I’m going to say it, we’re making a freakin’ fortune, our country is getting stronger and stronger all the time.

First of all, who are the two “big monsters” who will be the biggest stars in the country in a week? What the hell is that all about? I’m serious, does anyone know what he’s talking about?

But that’s not the headline here, of course.

It’s amazing that Trump realizes that he’s engaging in political malpractice here, against his advisers’ advice, literally mocking people struggling to pay for gas, and he still can’t help himself.

It is true that his buddies in the oil and gas industry are raking in billions. But that’s not “the country.” That’s a specific industry, and one that is gouging American consumers after promising that “drill, baby, drill” would lower prices by making the United States energy independent. Few if any people in that audience are benefiting from those billions.

But he doesn’t give a damn.

If that’s not one hell of a closing argument, I don’t know what is.

So add it to such Trump classics as:

“I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation. I don’t think about anybody.”

“I don’t want to drive housing prices down. I want to drive housing prices up.”

“You know what I really love? I love the inflation.”

He keeps telling us what he thinks of the American people, including his supporters. It’s a wonder that any remain.

Markos Moulitsas is founder and editor of the blogging website Daily Kos and author of three books.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Donald Trump tariffs

Trumpflation Is Here! (A Truly Legitimate Naming Opportunity)

Donald Trump loves to put his name on things, and when it comes to the recent burst of inflation, it’s totally deserved. Trump and Republican politicians are doing their best to try to make a simple story complicated. But there is no doubt that Trump is the lead and almost sole author of the inflation we are now seeing.

Just to quickly clear away the stupid, we did have a large burst of inflation under Biden, just like the rest of the world. We were hit with a worldwide pandemic in Trump’s first term, which he apparently can’t remember. The pandemic led to a massive fall in output in 2020, while Trump was president.

When Biden took office in January of 2021, we were still down more than 10 million jobs from the pre-pandemic level. Biden’s recovery package quickly got back the lost jobs and got the unemployment rate down to 4.0 percent by the end of the year, far faster than anyone expected.

The reopening of the economy from the pandemic recession led to a burst of inflation in the United States, as it did in Germany, France, and everywhere else. Suddenly people were buying lots of things, and it took a while for businesses to ramp up production.

If Biden had cared less about getting people back to work, the recovery package could have been smaller, and the peak inflation rate might have been one or two percentage points lower. But the important part of the story is that inflation quickly came down.

Year-over-year inflation peaked at 9.0 percent in June of 2022. A year later, it was down to 3.1 percent. It was down to 2.6 percent by the election in November of 2024. Inflation was generally expected to continue to fall and to be at or near the Fed’s 2.0 percent target by the end of 2025.

But then Trump turned everything around. Inflation began to rise even before he took office, as households and businesses stocked up on imported goods in anticipation of Trump tariffs. Durable goods prices, which had been falling since early 2023, stopped falling and began to rise. The Consumer Price Index also stopped falling and started to rise. Year-over-year inflation hit 3.0 percent in September 2025 but then slowed to 2.7 percent by the end of the year.

It likely would have continued to slow through 2026. After all, Trump’s tariffs were primarily a one-time event. If he didn’t keep imposing new ones (a big “if”), it was reasonable to think that inflation would settle back down to its pre-tariff pace.

But we never got to test that story. Trump decided to go to war with Iran at the end of February. As we all know, the stated rationale was crazy. Iran was not close to having nuclear weapons, and Trump himself had boasted about destroying the country’s nuclear program in a bombing strike the prior summer.

Logic doesn’t mean much to Donald Trump. He and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wanted to attack Iran, and whatever story they came up with was secondary.

Anyhow, regardless of their motives, they apparently did not expect that the Iranian government would both survive and retaliate by blocking oil from going through the Strait of Hormuz. This sent oil prices soaring, which is the biggest element in the current burst of inflation. However, since oil is not just gas for our cars, but diesel, which is needed for transporting just about everything, the price hikes are spreading throughout the economy. Also, since much of the world’s fertilizer production takes place in the Gulf countries, fertilizer prices are also soaring. This had some effect on crops already but will be a much bigger deal next year.

The broad impact of Trump’s war on inflation can be clearly seen in the Producer Price Index. The latest year-over-year figure was 6.3 percent for September. Since this is inflation at the wholesale level, it will be showing up at the consumer level in the next few months. To be clear, the impact is not one-to-one, so this doesn’t mean that consumer inflation will be rising to 6.3 percent, but it means that the direction of change in future months will likely be higher, not lower.

This is very far from a number consistent with the Fed’s two percent target. And this is all Trump’s doing. One important difference from the 1970s inflation is that, unlike the 1970s, wages are not rising in step with inflation. The pace of wage growth slowed from 4.0% in 2023 and 2024 to 3.0 percent in the most recent data. This means that workers are falling further behind as prices accelerate. The higher prices are going to profits, not covering higher labor costs. That might be good news for Trump’s billionaire donors, but not for the rest of us.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack, from which this is reprinted with permission.

Prices And Elections: Why Trump's  Inflation Aggravates Voter Outrage

Prices And Elections: Why Trump's  Inflation Aggravates Voter Outrage

In understanding both how the economy is doing and how people are feeling about it—two concepts that have widely diverged for years now—I’ve paid a lot of attention to two related price indicators. One is inflation, meaning the rate of change: how fast prices are going up/down. This is of course an area of intense focus by economists and especially monetary ones, as the Fed’s mandate is “full employment at steady prices,” the latter meaning inflation stable at around their two percent target.

I’ve focused as much if not more on the price level—what things cost. I was schooled on a daily basis back in my White House days that after a price shock, as occurred in the pandemic, people are not comforted by lower inflation, which just meant the prices they thought were way too high were growing more slowly. But they still vividly remembered their old price levels, and damnit, they wanted them back.

But there’s a third dimension of prices that has gotten less attention: their variance, meaning how widely inflation has varied over time. Folks are familiar with the famous bell curve in statistics. A low-variance bell curve looks like a narrow, high mountain; a high-variable bell curve looks like a low, wide mountain. In the figure below, the blue line plots a variable with low variance, the non-blue line (color blind!) shows high variance.

In what follows, I plot a number of CPI inflation series this way. Using year-over-year inflation, I look at two separate periods, pre- and post-pandemic, where pre is 2013-19 and post is 2020-26. Now, these variances don’t look as cleanly bell curve-y as those above, which is often the case with real life variables. But I employ a smoothing procedure (kernel density estimation) to smooth them out in a way that clarifies the presentation.

Here’s the overall CPI:

Striking, right?? Pre-pandemic, you see a tight, narrow distribution centered around two percent. But post, you see a much wider distribution centered around three percent and stretching up into double digits.

Here’s groceries, which represent just eight percent of the consumption basket but loom much larger than that in people’s minds.

Even more striking, no?! Pre: narrow distribution clumped around zero! Post: even wider than the overall (compare x-axes) with a peak at >2 percent.

I’ve done this with many other market-basket components and with the PCE series too. Same basic results.

Of course, I’m not saying people walk around mentally ginning up such figures in their heads. But I am firmly saying this: we humans are risk-averse creatures. And higher-variances feel more risky, more unsettling to us. This is reflected in all the angst you hear these days about “uncertainty.” Higher uncertainty means higher variances.

Of course, the 100-year pandemic was the key source of these expanded distributions, but things were settling down before the Orange Menace took over. The fact that the guy is a shock-risk-uncertainty merchant, bouncing from one bad idea to the next, enabled by Republicans who refuse to check him, is also in the more recent mix when it comes to this problem.

Bottom line, when we’re thinking about the inflationary sources of folks’ current anxiety, I’d still go with inflation and price levels, but I’d add inflation’s elevated variance to the list.

Jared Bernstein is a former chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers under President Joe Biden. He is a senior fellow at the Council on Budget and Policy Priorities. Please subscribe to his Substack, from which this is reprinted with permission.




Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World