Tag: trump prosecutions
Jerome Powell

Trump's Threat To Prosecute Fed Chair Powell Plunges​ Markets Into Chaos

The stock market plunged on Monday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 400 points at the opening bell, as economists and investors alike fear that the Federal Reserve Bank's independence is in doubt.

The stock market slide came the day after Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome Powell issued a rare and forceful video statement accusing Trump of opening a criminal investigation into him in order to pressure Powell into lowering interest rates.

"This new threat is not about my testimony last June or about the renovation of the Federal Reserve buildings. It is not about Congress's oversight role; the Fed through testimony and other public disclosures made every effort to keep Congress informed about the renovation project. Those are pretexts. The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President," Powell said. "This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions—or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation."

President Donald Trump has publicly chastised Powell numerous times for not lowering interest rates, a move that would make borrowing money for Americans cheaper but likely would spike inflation even further.

Trump has even threatened Powell with removal, though he backed off those threats after U.S. markets revolted.

Now, however, he is trying to coerce Powell to step down by opening a criminal investigation into Powell's congressional testimony about renovations to the Fed's buildings. Powell leaving early would allow Trump to install his own chair, whom he would be able to direct to bend to his will on monetary policy.

But the threats have clearly not worked on Powell, who instead of acquiescing to Trump's demands instead forcefully criticized the president.

And even typically sycophantic GOP senators are revolting against Trump's attempt to use lawfare to force Powell out.

Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) said that while he thinks Powell is a bad Federal Reserve chair, he is not a criminal. “I hope this criminal investigation can be put to rest quickly along with the remainder of Jerome Powell’s term,” Cramer said in a statement. “We need to restore confidence in the Fed.”

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) went a step further, saying he would put a hold on any future Federal Reserve nominees until the investigation ceases.

“If there were any remaining doubt whether advisers within the Trump Administration are actively pushing to end the independence of the Federal Reserve, there should now be none. It is now the independence and credibility of the Department of Justice that are in question,” Tillis said in a statement. “I will oppose the confirmation of any nominee for the Fed—including the upcoming Fed Chair vacancy—until this legal matter is fully resolved,” he added.



Economists and investors fear a politicized Federal Reserve because chaotic monetary policy would hurt the economy and leave investors weary about putting their money into U.S. assets, which according to the Council on Foreign Relations would “cause long-term economic harm."

Justin Wolfers, an economics professor at the University of Michigan, used Turkey as an example of what can happen if a despotic leader influences monetary policy. Wolfers posted a chart on X that showed after Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan took control of his country’s central bank, inflation spiked massively, peaking at a stomach churning 86 percent before falling to 38 percent currently.

Sounds like something voters, who are desperate to see inflation cool, would be super jazzed about.CFR also said that, "independence enhances the Fed’s credibility and fosters market confidence in its decisions. Crucially, it also empowers the Federal Reserve to take difficult but necessary actions, even when they are unpopular."

Indeed, countries with despotic leaders do not have independent banks like the Federal Reserve, which has caused their countries economic harm.

“Some countries that have prosecuted or threatened to prosecute central bankers for the purpose of political intimidation or punishment for monetary policy decisions: Argentina, Russia, Turkey, Venezuela and Zimbabwe,” Harvard economics professor Jason Furman wrote in a post on X. None of those countries have sound economies, and are not a list of nations the United States should want to be associated with.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


What's Next? Maybe Government Will Pay $2 Trillion For Making Trump Sad

What's Next? Maybe Government Will Pay $2 Trillion For Making Trump Sad

Trump hasn’t taken $2 trillion from taxpayers yet, but we should be prepared for that possibility. The story, which cannot possibly be given too much attention, is Trump’s demand that his Justice Department hand him $230 million because he doesn’t like the way he was treated over alleged crimes. This is straight-out theft from the government.

For a little orientation, it is extremely difficult for people being investigated or prosecuted for crimes to ever collect damages from the government, even when the government has engaged in totally improper behavior, as the New York Times pointed out in a piece this morning. Furthermore, it is difficult to see anything improper in the investigations and prosecutions pursued against Trump.

Starting with the so-called “Russia Hoax,” we have as a matter of public record that Donald Trump Jr. arranged a meeting, involving the two other top people on Trump’s 2016 campaign, the purpose of which was to get dirt from the Russian government on Trump’s opponent. Whether or not anything Trump personally did involved a crime requires a greater knowledge of specifics and the law than I possess, but it seems hard to maintain that there was nothing warranting investigation.

In the documents case, Trump refused to turn over documents in his possession that were repeatedly requested by the National Archives. His lawyers also gave false information about the documents that were still in Trump’s possession. Again, that certainly seems like something meriting investigation, although Trump nixed his own prosecution after he won the election.

There is a similar story with the prosecutions around his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. In addition to sponsoring the January 6th attack on the Capitol, Trump also threatened the secretary of state of Georgia with prosecution if he didn’t “find” 11,780 votes for him. It’s a pretty serious stretch to say this didn’t warrant investigation.

But beyond the absurdity of the claim that Trump was poorly treated, it’s worth asking what the $230 million demanded by Trump has to do with reality? Even if all the investigations were improper, what damage did Trump suffer? He had legal fees, but how high could these have possibly been? If he paid $1,000 an hour for his lawyers, and had 2,000 billable hours on each case, that would get to $6 million. That’s less than three percent of what Trump is demanding.

I suppose the rest of the $230 million is supposed to be for “pain and suffering,” Donald Trump’s feelings were hurt. In that case the government would be giving Trump more than 100 times what a typical worker would earn in a lifetime for his hurt feelings.

But worse than the absurdity of this story is the fact that there is no one to stop him. If the attorney general doesn’t give Trump the money he is demanding (she will), he would just fire her and find an attorney general who will.

Congress could in principle put a check on this, for example by impeaching Trump for blatantly illegal actions, but Speaker Mike Johnson says he doesn’t know anything about it, and therefore has no comment. Since the payment was already widely reported at the time, we should probably assume that Johnson will never know anything about it. In other words, if Trump wants to take $230 million from the taxpayers, he has a green light.

How do we get from $230 million to $2 trillion? Well, if Trump can get the government to write any check he wants, there is no reason for him not to go really big. He even has a story ready and waiting.

Trump claims to have brought in $20 trillion to the country in foreign investment. This claim has nothing to do with the real world. The tiny grain of truth in Trump’s claim is that he has gotten vague commitments from various countries of future investments as part of his trade deals, that may come to a bit more than one-twentieth of this sum. But reality has no place in Trump world.

Since Trump is running around claiming he has gotten $20 trillion for the country, it seems perfectly reasonable that he should get a commission, say 10 percent. This would get him $2 trillion. I’m sure he’ll even promise to give much of it to charity.

Yes, that is completely absurd, but there is no reason to believe that anyone would stop Trump from such a ridiculous money grab. Maybe Trump will be satisfied pocketing our $230 million, but don’t bet on it.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.

Reprinted with permission from Dean Baker.


'Blatant Corruption': Trump Demands $230M In New Shakedown Of US Government

'Blatant Corruption': Trump Demands $230M In New Shakedown Of US Government

President Donald Trump is under fire after a New York Times bombshell revealed he wants $230 million from the Justice Department over two investigations targeting him during his campaign.

The Times explained that there is “no parallel in American history, as Mr. Trump, a presidential candidate, was pursued by federal law enforcement and eventually won the election, taking over the very government that must now review his claims.” The paper of record also called it “the starkest example yet of potential ethical conflicts created by installing the president’s former lawyers atop the Justice Department.”

Critics are blasting the president.

“It’s hard to think of an action more purely corrupt than a …. president ordering the executive branch to pay him hundreds of millions of dollars,” wrote David French, a New York Times opinion columnist. “I cannot wait to read the MAGA defenses of this (and there will be many). They’ll display Soviet levels of sycophancy.”Attorney Andrew Weinstein, a former Obama and Biden appointee, noted that “$230 million could feed every homeless veteran in America for more than 3 years.”

Jesse Lee, a former Obama and Biden official, remarked, “What a g– crook.”

Marlow Stern, who teaches at the Columbia Journalism School and is a former Rolling Stone senior editor, asked, “now he’s extorting… the u.s. justice department?”

Mother Jones reporter Dan Friedman quoted the Trump White House Press Secretary: “’I think it’s frankly ridiculous that anyone in this room would even suggest that President Trump is doing anything for his own benefit,’ Karoline Leavitt said in May. ‘He left a life of luxury and a life of running a very successful real estate empire for public service.'”

Political historian Brian Rosenwald commented, “Like come the f– on, this is the most blatant corruption in American history. He’s just stealing from us the taxpayers.”

Derek Martin, founder and president of Pathfinder Research, wrote: “Trump is demanding taxpayers write him a check for $230 million while Republicans tell us they can’t afford to help ordinary Americans pay for health insurance. Cartoonishly evil.”

Jeff Hauser, who writes the Revolving Door Project on Substack, observed: “The dude is desecrating the White House and extorting the Treasury during a shutdown [after] several million Americans protested him. It’s kind of now or never for an opposition party to be provocative in attacking corruption. Trump is too busy enriching himself to govern.”

Media Matters’ Matthew Gertz wrote: “The president of the United States is attempting a smash-and-grab on the U.S. Treasury, and the people with the ability to say no are his former personal lawyers, this is insane.”

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World