Tag: chuck schumer
Ayanna Pressley

Why Did Ayanna Presley Issue An Unhelpful (And Inaccurate) Attack On The Democrats?

Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) decided to inflame intraparty tensions last Friday by accusing the Democratic establishment of failing to invest equitably in progressive and diverse candidates, including Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed.

“The DSCC should take note because it is shameful that we are not seeing an equitable investment in progressive and diverse candidates like Abdul El-Sayed, like [Democratic Florida Senate candidate] Angie Nixon, like [Democratic Mississippi Senate candidate] Scott Colom,” Pressley said, while praising Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) for donating $1 million to El-Sayed’s campaign.

It was great that AOC donated that money from her ample fundraising stash, currently sitting at $37 million. Pressley could’ve praised her generosity, and that would’ve been wonderful. Heck, she could’ve celebrated the remarkable full-party press to get El-Sayed elected.

Instead, she chose to manufacture an ideological grievance that doesn’t square with the extraordinary resources the party is already committing to his election.

To wit:

  • Is there any more establishment figure than Sen. Chuck Schumer? His Senate Majority PAC has spent $35M and counting on the race.
  • DSCC Chair Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand has been unequivocal in her support, saying, “He’s a great candidate. He’s going to win, and we are all united.”
  • I’ve seen reports of $14 million to $16 million in DSCC spending commitments, though I haven’t been able to independently verify those figures. But top Democratic strategist Guy Cecil says the DSCC and Senate Majority PAC are spending more than $50 million combined in Michigan.
  • Such hated “establishment” figures as former Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Barack Obama are campaigning for him.

That’s a remarkable amount of institutional support for a candidate who defeated the party’s more moderate wing in the primary. So what, exactly, is Pressley complaining about?

Yes, it would be nice to see more money spent in places like Florida and Mississippi, where Democrats have outside opportunities to expand the Senate map. But those are reach seats, and every dollar spent defending Michigan is a dollar unavailable elsewhere.Furthermore, El-Sayed is one of only two Democratic Senate nominees—the other being Maine’s Troy Jackson, whose race has been a clusterfuck—underperforming the cycle’s strong Democratic lean.

According to Nate Silver’s models, El-Sayed leads Republican Mike Rogers 48.5% to 45.1%. Meanwhile, Democratic gubernatorial nominee Jocelyn Benson enjoys a much more comfortable 50.4% to 42.4% advantage.

That’s a significant gap between two Democrats running statewide in the same political environment.There are undoubtedly multiple factors at play, but it’s hardly unreasonable to wonder whether El-Sayed’s leftist politics are somewhat out of sync with a closely divided purple state that President Donald Trump won two out of the last three presidential elections.

Perhaps a more mainstream nominee would have required less spending to defend this seat, freeing up resources for those opportunities in Florida and Mississippi. Or maybe Michigan was always fated to be a fierce and closely fought battleground, no matter who the nominee. We can’t know for sure, nor does it matter much now. The state’s Democratic primary electorate made their choice, and the Democratic establishment has opened its wallet and is working hard to elect that choice.

And that’s what makes Pressley’s attack so frustrating.

El-Sayed would be a great addition to the Senate. Almost everyone in our party is united in working to make that happen.

If El-Sayed comes up short in November, it won’t be because the Democratic establishment refused to invest time, money, and political capital in his campaign.

It would be nice if Pressley acknowledged that.

Markos Moulitsas is founder and editor of the blogging website Daily Kos and author of three books.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Outraged By Schumer Cameo On Fox, Trump Demands Uninterrupted Propaganda

Outraged By Schumer Cameo On Fox, Trump Demands Uninterrupted Propaganda

President Donald Trump lashed out at Fox News on Wednesday with a lengthy online harangue that made little sense but demonstrates the network’s impossible task in satisfying the president’s demand for pure propaganda.

“Why does FoxNews always put Chuck Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries, Jessica Tarlov, and every Democrat on, saying bad things about the Republican Party and, of course, me?” Trump posted to his Truth Social account at 12:15 pm ET. “I actually think they get more airtime than Pro Republicans. This is why MAGA, and REAL Patriots, will never like Fox! They repeat a completely negative narrative, on and on it goes, and then we get a quick retort.”

I’ve spent nearly a decade following the twists and turns of Trump’s symbiotic relationship with Fox, particularly the ways in which his social media activity often corresponds to what he sees on his television — and I’m not quite sure what he’s talking about. The president’s commentary about Fox typically blends praise for the hosts he loves and segments he appreciates with critiques of personalities who don’t meet his standard for sycophancy and attacks on the network’s accurate pollsters, but usually his complaints are more coherent than this.

The most plausible hypothesis I can come up with is that Trump looked up at his television at 12:09 p.m. ET, saw a brief clip that Fox Business was airing of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) criticizing the GOP’s AI strategy, and flipped out — and that suggests that Trump doesn’t want his propaganda network to even air footage of the Democratic opposition (except, perhaps, to deride them).


Meanwhile:

  • Schumer does not appear in Media Matters’ database of Fox News weekday appearances, which dates to August 2017.
  • House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) has made at least 5 appearances on Fox weekday shows since November 2018, with the most recent airing in January of this year.
  • Fox’s Jessica Tarlov is the Democratic host tasked with matching up against four conservatives at once on the network’s weekday panel show, The Five. She made 2 guest appearances on other Fox shows in September; conservative co-hosts Jesse Watters, Greg Gutfeld, and Dana Perino all have separate weekday Fox shows of their own.
  • In September, weekday appearances on Fox News by congressional Republicans and Trump administration officials outnumbered appearances by congressional Democratic guest appearances by 148 to 7.
  • Fox literally employs the president’s daughter-in-law, former Republican National Committee chair Lara Trump, as the host of a weekly program she uses to promote his administration. (And of course, his current defense secretary is a former Fox host; his U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia is a former Fox host; his transportation secretary is a former Fox host whose wife still works for the network; his former campaign manager, his former secretary of state, and his former White House press secretary are on the Fox payroll; and so on and so forth.)
  • The network relied on Sean Hannity — a confidant and adviser to Trump who uses his show to propagandize on the president’s behalf — to lead its coverage of the GOP’s midterm convention.

And that’s before we even get into the network’s sycophantic coverage of Trump and his administration.

Fox celebrates Trump's supposed successes and promotes the GOP — but it's never enough for him

Fox programming — in the lead-up to the midterms in particular — is a non-stop exercise in assuring viewers that Trump is giving them everything they’ve ever wanted, while sidelining stories that could potentially upset them or harm the GOP’s election push.

On Monday night, for example, Jesse Watters opened his primetime show with a mash note to Trump that simply must be seen to be believed.



Watters and his colleagues have spent substantial portions of their shows this week lavishing Trump with praise and issuing dire warnings to their viewers about what might occur if Democrats were to triumph in the midterm elections.

Just hours before Trump lashed out at the network, high-brow hack Hugh Hewitt said on Fox & Friends that the president would be a boon to GOP candidates because Trump is “the get-out-the-vote machine for the MAGA base and for everyone that doesn't want their inflation to go nuts.” (As of October 1, The New York Times poll average places Trump’s approval rating at a catastrophic 37-61.)

“Trump has won in Iran,” Hewitt explained. “He’s won in the battle of the Strait of Hormuz. He's won with his economic policies. I think the Republicans have a good case to make. They just have to make it every day, morning, noon and night, and I think they're beginning to get into that groove and they've got plenty of time to make the argument.”

Later in the program, the hosts highlighted different Trump policies that appealed to them, with Lawrence Jones concluding that the White House simply faces a messaging problem.

“I just think that maybe it has been bad producing from the White House when it comes from the message, but this story has not been told,” he said. “Maybe so much and so complex or the president is just focused on doing his agenda, but the communications need to do a better job letting the American people know exactly the benefits that they’ve been — because a lot of people don’t even know about it."

Examples like these are a dime a dozen — but apparently not enough for Trump. The president won’t be satisfied until every minute of Fox programming is indistinguishable from North Korean state TV — and every minute of coverage at every other outlet is as well.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

​'Sabato's Crystal Ball​': Odds Of Flipping Senate Blue Keep Getting Better

​'Sabato's Crystal Ball​': Odds Of Flipping Senate Blue Keep Getting Better

Democrats’ odds of taking control of the Senate just got even better, with The University of Virginia Center for Politics Sabato’s Crystal Ball flipping three races blue.

According to the new ratings, North Carolina’s open Senate race is now projected to flip into Democrats’ hands, with the contest now rated “Lean Democratic.”

And the Senate contests in Alaska and Ohio—states that President Donald Trump carried by 13 points and 11 points, respectively—are now rated “toss-ups.”

“As we reassess the Senate playing field with a little less than five months to go until the November election, three Senate ratings move in Democrats’ favor today, and there are now enough toss-up races to give Democrats a clearer path to winning the Senate majority,” Sabato’s Crystal Ball declared.

Republicans are on shaky ground in all three of those states because Democrats not only nominated strong challengers who have won statewide races before, but Trump’s popularity is now underwater—even in states that he carried in 2016, 2020, and 2024.

Apparently, even die-hard Republicans in red states aren’t fans of Trump saying that “I love the inflation” and that he doesn’t care about Americans’ financial situations.

“If both [Alaska’s former Rep. Mary] Peltola and [Ohio’s former Sen. Sherrod] Brown could come reasonably close in 2024 as Trump was carrying their states by double digits, doesn’t it seem plausible that both have a reasonable chance to win in what should be a much better political environment than 2024 was?” wrote Sabato’s Crystal Ball.

It continued, “Meanwhile, [Alaska’s GOP Sen. Dan] Sullivan and [Ohio’s GOP Sen. Jon] Husted would probably be fine in most years against most opponents, but this may not be most years, and Peltola and Brown are not most opponents.”

The changes came the same day as a new poll from Emerson College, showing Democrats growing their lead on the generic ballot—which asks voters what party they want to see in control of Congress after the next election—to a stunning ten points.

That double-digit margin is higher than the eight-point lead Emerson clocked Democrats at in October 2018—right before Democrats went on to regain control of the House by 8.4 points.

Republicans clearly know that they’re in trouble.

According to Politico, “People close to the president are concerned about Ohio and Sen. Jon Husted’s political team, and there is consternation about whether they’re up to the task.”

And Semafor’s Burgess Everett reported on Tuesday that Republican senators were shown polling that made the races look “bleak” and “challenging” for their party.

Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is confident in Democrats’ chances.

“We are poised to take back the Senate. We needed multiple paths. No one thought Iowa or Texas would be part of the path—but it is,” he told Punchbowl News Thursday, comparing this year’s midterms to 2006, when Democrats won control of Congress amid backlash to then-President George W. Bush’s unpopular wars.

Schumer added, “It’s almost as if Trump wants to deliberately sabotage the Senate Republicans.”

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


Shunning Schumer And Jeffries, Trump Earns Blame For Looming Shutdown

Shunning Schumer And Jeffries, Trump Earns Blame For Looming Shutdown

"The way this country works, you've got to sit down with people you may not agree with and come to an agreement, come to a negotiation," Sen. Chuck Schumer, the minority leader, said on Tuesday after President Donald Trump canceled his meeting with Democratic leaders. "Donald Trump is not a king. He's the president, and he has his responsibility to work to avoid the Trump shutdown, and time is of the essence."

It's a matter of simple arithmetic. Even when you control Congress and the White House, you still need 60 votes in the Senate to fund the government. Unless they come up with those votes by Tuesday, the government shuts down and real people suffer. Will they blame Trump? They should.

Trump reportedly canceled the meeting with Democrats not after talking to Democrats but after a call with Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune. According to news reports, both of them encouraged Trump not to speak to the Democrats. Johnson had told reporters before the meeting was canceled that he was "not certain" it was "necessary." Indeed, Trump said earlier this month that Republicans should not "even bother" negotiating with Democrats, suggesting that Republicans can fund the government without any Democratic votes. How?

This is no way to run the country. It's Trump's way or the highway. So far, it has worked, sort of. Trump got his big, beautiful bill. The rich are getting richer. Working people will pay for it, but not until after the midterm elections. Clever?

Of course, Democrats have an agenda here. They have publicly stated that any measure to extend spending also include more than $1 trillion to continue Obamacare subsidies and reverse cuts to Medicaid and other health programs that Republicans made last summer. So, at least at this point, Democrats are positioning themselves as fighting for health care while Republicans are positioning themselves as going it alone.

That is clearly the place where Trump is most comfortable. He openly hates his opponents — and I don't mean Vladimir Putin. He said it out loud at Charlie Kirk's funeral. Why should he have to work with people he hates?

The answer — which he seeks to avoid at all costs — is because this is a democracy, and this is how a democracy works. There are times for division and times for bipartisan unity. Keeping the government open should be a time for unity. No one wants to be responsible for Social Security checks getting delayed or for the IRS not answering the phones. For Trump to think he can go this one alone and not be blamed for it, or better yet, blame the Democrats, is pure folly. Everyone will be blamed, starting with Trump.

We are as divided and polarized as a nation as we have not been in recent history. Our politics are toxic. It infects our families almost as much as it infects Washington. I can't believe this is what a majority of Americans want or what they voted for when they cast their ballots for Trump. Trump voters also have a big interest in protecting Obamacare and Medicaid, as Trump surely must know. How can a meeting with Democrats not be a useful way to at least show that you are trying to pull this country together and do right by it?

"No one wants a shutdown, but agreeing to a deal that can be revoked whenever Trump demands it isn't responsible," Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat on the Budget Committee, said. "It only teaches the other side that they can do it again and again."

And they have. In 2018, what were supposed to be private meetings morphed into a televised airing of grievances roughly a week ahead of the shutdown deadline. Trump reportedly was optimistic about working with Democrats to come up with a compromise. It didn't happen. The government shut down for 34 days, the longest in our history. No one wins with a repeat of that.

Susan Estrich is a celebrated feminist legal scholar, the first female president of the Harvard Law Review, and the first woman to run a U.S. presidential campaign. She has written eight books.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World