Tag: republican racism
Mike Davis

In MAGA Republican Rhetoric, Racism Is Now A Feature, Not A Bug

Racism is no longer a deal breaker — in life or in politics.

It’s a tough truth to face, especially, I admit, for someone whose family members used nonviolence to fight dangerous civil rights battles, forcing a resistant America to live up to its ideals.

But it’s a truth that must be faced. The problem is, not too many are willing to call the backsliding out for what it is. We live in a world where racist words and actions are couched in euphemisms like “racially insensitive” or “racially tinged,” when those words or actions are noticed at all.

Maybe if we all close our eyes and pretend, racism will disappear, as Supreme Court Justice John G. Roberts Jr. asserted when he wrote the majority opinion eviscerating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in the 2013 Shelby decision: “Our country has changed, and while any racial discrimination in voting is too much, Congress must ensure that the legislation it passes to remedy that problem speaks to current conditions.”

Remembering that as a young attorney in 1982, Roberts wrote that the landmark act represented “the most intrusive interference imaginable by federal courts into state and local processes,” it seems he was just playing the long game.

Today, being called a racist is worse than actual racism.

Consider Vice President JD Vance’s well-received speech at the recent Republican convention/Trump rally in Texas, with reports essentially proclaiming “A GOP Star Is Born.”

His applause line — “We were tired of being called racists for noticing that our country was becoming dirtier and poorer and less safe and less prosperous” — was couched in the language of policy difference over issues such as immigration, crime and culture, instead of being called out as hateful rhetoric that would not have been out of place at a white nationalist rally.

For the man next in line to the presidency, this was not a one-off. This is the guy who spread lies that residents of his home state — at the time legal residents revitalizing Ohio cities and towns — were eating people’s pets. Hard-working men, women and children of Haitian descent paid and continue to pay the price.

I expect to see the ambitious Vance’s words in future campaign ads, maybe alongside images of white South Africans strolling the red carpet the Trump administration has laid down for them.Then, there’s Mike Davis, who is not some random social media blowhard, but a Republican leader, lawyer and Trump ally. Davis worked for the Senate Judiciary Committee under GOP Chair Charles E. Grassley and now leads a group called the Article III Project, which claims to “fight leftist lawfare” and “fearlessly defend” conservative judges.

His recent X post, ostensibly critiquing a speaker at a socialism conference, but containing a message that was clearly designed for a broader audience, was as offensive as it was cliched: “Dear Bitching Minorities: Here’s my proposal for your reparations: One-way tickets anywhere. 6 months of living expenses. Renounce your U.S. citizenship. Never come back. Good luck. You’ll need it. (Especially with that nappy-ass head of hair.)”

So, he wants the people who built this country, who continue to contribute to its prosperity, to just go away? Not a chance.

Unfortunately, there is also no chance that Davis will suffer consequences for his hate or his weird obsession with hair texture.

In today’s GOP, he might just get support and a push to run the Smithsonian, where the stellar visionary Lonnie Bunch, who recently announced his resignation, has served as secretary. I’m sure Davis would love to censor the museums that tell America’s beautiful, horrible, triumphant story, replacing the exhibits with a comic-book whitewash so his racist post would make some kind of twisted sense.

What I haven’t heard are condemnations from GOP elites or media questions asking every Republican at a microphone if he or she supports the Davis solution for making America whiter.

That’s opposed to the inquisition that greets Democrats, asking them to comment on the latest extremist rant from streamers and social media warriors.

The thing is, Republicans could make inroads with more Black voters, if only they pretended to care about them as Americans, or just as human beings.

My mother was a Maryland Republican and elections official who was proud to vote for GOP candidates such as Sen. Charles Mathias. He worked for civil rights, clashed with the Nixon and Reagan administrations over justice policies and was called “the conscience of the Senate” by its Democratic leader, Mike Mansfield. But those days, when party members bucked leadership over issues and actually had a conscience, are in the past.

Not that Democrats are pure of heart when it comes to respecting or just acknowledging one of the party’s most loyal group of voters.

When Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico of Texas recently said, in an interview on MS NOW, that his party has taken Black voters for granted, he got credit for saying out loud what many were already thinking.

Listening carefully would help. Recent history proves Black voters could have saved the party some trouble if only it had paid attention.

In 2022, some Pennsylvania voters pointed out possible character flaws in Senate Democratic primary candidate John Fetterman, who while mayor of Braddock detained a Black jogger while holding a shotgun, and then refused to apologize or simply acknowledge how badly that scenario could have played out.

When the party placed South Carolina first on its primary calendar, and received some pushback from critics who downplayed the importance of the state’s Black Democratic voters, labeling them establishment and controlled by the church and Rep. James E. Clyburn, it was noted by folks who’ve had to be strategic — in voting and in life.

And remember who warned Democrats that Michael “Stop and Frisk” Bloomberg was never going to come close to the presidency, with so many base voters reminding everyone about the hell he put a lot of young Black and brown New Yorkers through when he was mayor.

“Vote for the Democrat, what choice do you have?” may not be the motivation many Democrats think it is.

That is, unless Republicans continue to proudly unleash the racist rhetoric that seems a feature, not a bug, of the party in 2026.

Mary C. Curtis has worked at The New York Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Charlotte Observer, as national correspondent for Politics Daily, and is a senior facilitator with The OpEd Project. She is host of the CQ Roll Call “Equal Time with Mary C. Curtis” podcast. Follow her on X @mcurtisnc3.

Reprinted with permission from Roll Call

Young GOP Leaders Joked About 'Gas Chambers,' Slavery And Black 'Monkeys' On Telegram

Young GOP Leaders Joked About 'Gas Chambers,' Slavery And Black 'Monkeys' On Telegram

In an exclusive story, Politico got access to thousands of private messages revealing young GOP leaders joking about gas chambers and slavery, among other "insensitive and inexcusable" topics.

The chats took place on the Telegram app, Politico reports. In them, they "referred to Black people as monkeys and 'the watermelon people' and mused about putting their political opponents in gas chambers."

Kansas Young Republicans vice chair William Hendrix, former vice chair of the New York State Young Republicans Bobby Walker and Chairman of the Association of New York State Young Republican Clubs Peter Giunta were among the Republican leaders named in the report.

“Can we fix the showers?” Joe Maligno, who previously identified himself as the general counsel for the New York State Young Republicans, replied.

“I’m ready to watch people burn now,” Annie Kaykaty, New York’s national committeewoman, said.

The 2,900 pages of chats shared among young Republicans between January and mid-August also featured members talking "about the pressure to cow to Trump to avoid being called a RINO."

Giunta, Politco reports, apologized, saying “I am so sorry to those offended by the insensitive and inexcusable language found within the more than 28,000 messages of a private group chat that I created during my campaign to lead the Young Republicans."

“While I take complete responsibility, I have had no way of verifying their accuracy and am deeply concerned that the message logs in question may have been deceptively doctored," Giunta said.

Social media, however, wasn't so accepting of the apology, nor were they surprised about the context of the messages.

"Shocked. Shocked I tell you. Who could have expected this from them?" wrote veteran Kirk Wolff on X.

"This is Charlie Kirk's legacy," wrote Drew Smith on X.

"They can't even scream liberal 'fake news!' cause it was leaked by Republicans," wrote Profiteroles Carmichael on X.

"This is sickening, the rhetoric needs to be toned down on both sides, and even though I voted for Pres Trump 3 times, he needs to stop it too, we need a calm leader who wants to unite the country, not childish memes and name calling," wrote Sherri Twigg on X.

Sen. Perdue's Racist Insult To Kamala Raises $2 Million --  For His Opponent

Sen. Perdue's Racist Insult To Kamala Raises $2 Million --  For His Opponent

At a rally for Donald Trump on Friday, Sen. David Perdue (R-GA) mocked Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) for her name. By Sunday, Perdue's Democratic opponent had raised nearly $2 million off of the racist comments.

Perdue intentionally mispronounced Harris' name at the Trump rally in Macon, Georgia.

"The most insidious thing that Chuck Schumer and Joe Biden are trying to perpetuate, and Bernie [Sanders] and Elizabeth [Warren] and Kamala — Kah-ma-la, or Kah-mah-la, or Kamala-mala-mala, I don't know, whatever," he said, drawing laughter from the rally's attendees.

"Well that is incredibly racist," Sabrina Singh, Harris' press secretary, responded in a tweet.

On Friday evening, Jon Ossoff — Perdue's Democratic opponent — tweeted the video clip of Perdue mispronouncing Harris' name, adding, "We are so much better than this."

Perdue's viral moment backfired in a major way. According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Ossoff raised more than $1.8 million from 42,000 donors between Friday and Sunday.

This fundraising haul came just days after Ossoff announced raising a record-breaking $21.3 million in the third quarter of 2020. Perdue raised roughly $5.6 million over the same period.

Harris and Perdue have served in the Senate together for four years. Perdue has even cosponsored two of Harris' bills.

Rather than quickly apologize for the racist slur of Harris, Perdue's campaign pretended it was an inadvertent error. "Sen. Perdue simply mispronounced Sen. Harris' name. He didn't mean anything by it," Perdue's spokesperson, Casey Black, tweeted on Friday.

Perdue's campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn't the first time Perdue has made a bigoted attack against a political opponent. In July, the Perdue campaign made a Facebook ad featuring a distorted photo of Ossoff, who is Jewish, with his nose enlarged — a common anti-Semitic trope.

The moment was reminiscent of another Senate race 14 years ago. Then, Sen. George Allen (R-VA) was recorded harassing a 20-year-old Democratic tracker named S.R Sidarth — a Virginia native whose parents immigrated from India.

"This fella here over here with the yellow shirt. Macaca or whatever his name is," Allen said, using a racist term comparing Sidarth to a monkey. "Let's give a welcome to Macaca here. Welcome to America and the real world of Virginia."

Allen, who had been favored in the race, lost to Democrat Jim Webb after the story broke.

Ossoff is not alone among Democratic candidates in his massive 2020 fundraising advantage. Across the country, Democrats running for Senate have broken records and raised far more than Republicans in competitive races. In Maine and Iowa, Democratic challengers have outraised GOP incumbents by about a four-to-one margin over the past three months.

Polls show the race between Ossoff and Perdue to be close. RealClear Politics' average puts Perdue up by just one point, though two recent polls gave Ossoff the lead.

If no candidate receives an outright majority in November's election, the top two finishers will face off in a January runoff election.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World