Tag: un climate conference
COP31: While The World Goes Green, Trump Hinders American Progress

COP31: While The World Goes Green, Trump Hinders American Progress

With the start of the international climate conference, it’s a good time to see how the world is doing on the green transition. It is important to look at the world rather than just the United States. This is not only because we know that in the battle against global warming, Donald Trump is on the other side, but also because it is what the world as a whole does that matters, not just the United States.

In pretty much every area the world is making great strides toward moving towards clean energy, driven largely by innovations in China and its massive manufacturing capacity. But innovation in clean technology is a worldwide phenomenon and there is still manufacturing capacity outside of China. More of this is also shifting towards clean energy.

As I’ve noted before, Trump’s War on Iran has been a big plus in this respect, both because it sent oil prices soaring and also because it drove home clearly the instability of oil supplies. Wind or solar energy looks much better in this context.

Electric Vehicles

EV sales are projected to hit roughly 23 million in 2026. (This includes plug-in hybrids.) This is roughly 27% of the world’s car market. Many countries have far higher shares. In Norway, it’s close to 100%. In China, by far the world’s largest market, it has been close to two-thirds in recent months. The growth over the last two years has been almost just under 37%.

With China’s EV exports doubling year over year, at least in part as a result of the war, and new EV factories being constructed or converted, this sort of growth is likely to continue. At this pace, it is plausible EVs will be close to half the world car market by the end of the decade.

Solar Power

The growth in solar power capacity has been somewhat slower in 2026, because China has slowed its domestic construction, even as its exports have soared. The vast majority of new energy capacity being installed in Africa is now solar. That is also true in many countries across South Asia, notably Pakistan.

Wind Power

Wind power installation slowed in 2026, primarily because of a slowing in China. It is still expected to reach 173 gigawatts for the year, enough to power more than 120 million homes.

Battery Storage Capacity

Perhaps the biggest development in recent years has been the plunging price for storing electricity. The cost of storing energy has fallen more than 99% over the last three decades. This has made the intermittent power offered by solar and wind energy a far smaller issue, as electricity can be stored in peak hours and then produced by storage at night or in periods where the wind is not blowing. The world is expected to add more than 350 gigawatts of storage capacity in 2026, twice the pace of 2024.

The price declines for the cost of storage are likely to continue, as the technology for producing sodium-based batteries has developed rapidly. Sodium batteries are far cheaper than lithium batteries. More importantly, sodium is far more plentiful and much less environmentally destructive to mine. Sodium-based batteries are likely to rapidly replace lithium ones for grid storage, although the weight advantage per unit of electricity may mean that lithium batteries continue to be widely used in EVs.

Clean Energy is Cheaper: Are People Willing to Sacrifice to Destroy the Planet?

For decades, environmentalists have been dealing with the question of how much people are willing to sacrifice in terms of higher costs to limit the damage that we are doing to the environment for future generations. The development of technology has flipped this question.

EVs are now cheaper to buy than gas-powered cars (not in the U.S. because of tariffs). They are far cheaper to operate. The same is true for electricity from wind and solar compared to electricity from coal or natural gas. And the gap is growing as storage costs continue to decline.

It would still cost money to speed the transition, for example, by the early retirement of coal plants that are cheaper to operate than installing new solar or wind, but even that gap is falling. It is unfortunate that so much of the progress in developing and producing clean energy products is taking place in China and not in the United States, but it is essential for the world that it takes place somewhere. And maybe when we again have a reality-based president in the United States, our country can again play a leadership role.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack, from which this is reprinted with permission.

COP26 S​​trikes Hard-Fought Deal But UN Warns It's 'Not Enough'

COP26 S​​trikes Hard-Fought Deal But UN Warns It's 'Not Enough'

Glasgow (AFP) - Nearly 200 nations came together Saturday on a global deal to combat climate change after two weeks of painful negotiation, but fell short of what science says is needed to contain dangerous temperature rises.

Rich countries stood accused of failing at the COP26 summit in Glasgow to deliver much-needed finance to vulnerable states at risk of drought, rising seas, fire, and storms.

Britain's COP26 president Alok Sharma rounded up the marathon negotiations telling delegates: "It is now decision time. And the choices you are set to make are vitally important."

But China and India insisted that language on fossil fuels be weakened in the final summit decision text.

As the final deal was clinched, a tearful Sharma said, "I apologize for the way this process has unfolded. I am deeply sorry," before banging down his gavel.

Delegates entered the talks charged with keeping the 2015 Paris Agreement goal of limiting temperature rises to 1.5-2C degrees within reach.

They were also tasked with finding the funding for nations most at risk of climate-related droughts, floods and storms supercharged by rising seas.

Observers said the agreement fell far short of what is needed to avert dangerous warming and help countries adapt or recoup damages from the disasters already unfurling globally.

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, reacting to the outcome, welcomed the deal, but stressed it was "not enough."

"We are still knocking on the door of climate catastrophe," he added.

Swedish environmental activist Greta Thunberg said the talks had achieved nothing but "blah, blah, blah," echoing earlier comments.

Laurence Tubiana, the architect of the Paris deal, told AFP that "COP has failed to provide immediate assistance for people suffering now."

Survival

The final text urged nations to accelerate efforts to "phase down" unfiltered coal and "phase out" inefficient fossil fuel subsidies.

Large emitters China and India had opposed the mention of the polluting fuels, and the language in the final text was significantly more nuanced than earlier drafts.

The deal also called on all countries to accelerate their emissions cuts by submitting new national plans by 2022, three years earlier than agreed in Paris.

But after resistance from rich nations led by the United States and EU, the text omitted any reference to a specific finance facility for the loss and damage climate change has already caused in the developing world.

It instead only promised future "dialogue" on the subject.

"For some loss and damage may be the beginning of conversation and dialogue," said Shauna Aminath, the Maldives environment minister. "But for us this is a matter of survival."

Although host Britain said it wanted COP26 to keep the 1.5C temperature cap in reach, a UN scientific assessment last week said countries' latest climate plans put Earth on course to heat 2.7C.

The text noted "with deep regret" that wealthy nations had also failed to stump up a separate annual sum of $100 billion they promised over a decade ago. It urged countries to pay up "urgently and through 2025".

It also promised to double finance to help developing countries adapt to rising temperatures by the same date.

1.5C On Life Support

But developing nations said it was unfair for the summit to produce an unbalanced agreement heavily weighted toward "mitigation" -- how economies can ditch fossil fuels and reach net-zero emissions by 2050.

They wanted specific instruction on how they can meet the bill of decarbonising while also adapting to the natural disasters supercharged by global warming.

"We were told that COP26 was the last best chance to keep 1.5C alive but it's been placed on life support," Amanda Mukwashi, CEO of Christian Aid.

"Rich nations have kicked the can down the road and with it the promise of the urgent climate action people on the frontline of this crisis need."

The two weeks in Glasgow saw a number of high-profile announcements from world leaders, such as a commitment to slash methane emissions by 30 percent by 2030.

It also witnessed mass protests against what activists said was a dangerous lack of urgency.

Teresa Anderson, climate policy coordinator at ActionAid International, said COP26 was "an insult to the millions of people whose lives are being torn apart by the climate crisis."

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World