Tag: kash patel
OMG GOP WTF: The Malignant Weirdness Of Today's Republican Party

OMG GOP WTF: The Malignant Weirdness Of Today's Republican Party

Why are Republicans so weird?

Seriously. There was a time when our disagreements were over taxes, war, and reproductive rights. Those were profound disagreements, but they took place in a shared reality. We agreed on the basic facts, even if we fought bitterly over what to do about them.

Now they’re a toxic blend of corruption, incompetence, weird obsessions, and spectacular self-owns. They aren’t just governing badly. They’re making a mockery of everything they touch.

For example, does Elon Musk really have nothing to focus on beyond Hollywood casting decisions?

Then there’s Trump’s handling of E. Jean Carroll, the advice columnist whom he was found liable for sexually abusing. Trump remains obsessed with the $5.6 million judgment against him. At this point, it obviously isn’t about the money. Five million dollars means nothing to him. It’s about continuing to punish the woman who dared hold him accountable.

My God, he is vile.

Meanwhile, there is always a never-ending list of this administration's malicious incompetence.

Trump’s aesthetic tastes have always been a crime against good judgment. I would gladly pay pay-per-view prices to watch the next Democratic president rip every gaudy gold ornament out of the White House and the rest of Washington.

Trump is running out of space for his garish gold garbage

Electing the right people matters. Who wields power matters. Competence matters. Finally, Republicans don't have a monopoly on weird.

Benedict Fetterman?

Markos Moulitsas is founder and editor of the blogging website Daily Kos and author of three books.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Fending Off Drunk Image, FBI Director Patel Withdraws Into  'Panic Mode'

Fending Off Drunk Image, FBI Director Patel Withdraws Into  'Panic Mode'

President Donald Trump’s FBI director, Kash Patel, is reportedly in “panic mode” as he scrambles to save his job amidst reports of excessive drinking.

“FBI Director Kash Patel ordered the polygraphing of more than two dozen former and current members of his security detail, as well as other staff, and has been described as being in panic mode to save his job and find leakers among his team, according to two people briefed on the development,” MS NOW’s Carol Leonnig and Ken Dilanian reported on Thursday. They added that Patel reportedly “walled himself off” from senior leaders at the FBI because of the multiple media reports about his drinking impairing his leadership.

“The director has also avoided meeting this week with some key operational leaders of the bureau, the people said, raising concerns inside the FBI about Patel’s ability to stay abreast of pressing threats and investigations in order to make the best decisions,” Leonnig and Dilanian addeIn addition to being angered at reports of him drinking (which prompted Patel to sue The Atlantic for covering them), Patel is also upset for reportedly ordering SWAT agents to protect his girlfriend, country music performer Alexis Wilkins, in Nashville, as well as for using a government jet to travel for a so-called “date night.”

“MS NOW reported in February that Patel decided to fly to Milan, Italy, on the government jet to watch the U.S. men’s ice hockey team in the final games of the Olympics,” Leonnig and Dilanian wrote. “At the time, a spokesperson for Patel said in an on-the-record statement that the Italy trip was for business, and Patel was attending several security and partner meetings. Videos emerged shortly after Team USA won the gold medal of Patel in the men’s ice hockey team’s locker room, joining a victory celebration by chugging beer, spraying alcohol in the air and jumping up and down and cheering.”

They added, “The images infuriated the president, according to sources who spoke to MS NOW at the time, and he told Patel he didn’t like the optics of a director drinking while claiming to be on a government business trip.”

Speaking to MS NOW on Thursday, former FBI Assistant Special Agent Michael Feinberg told anchor Katy Tur that Patel’s alleged poor behavior has demoralized the bureau he was appointed to lead.

"Most FBI agents feel — I do not know a single agent who, like me, left, nor do I have any friends whatsoever still in the Bureau, who have a single positive thing to say about his stewardship," Feinberg told Tur on Thursday. "Nobody agrees with every director's every decision. I was there for [Robert] Mueller, for [James] Comey, for [Christopher] Wray, and for a brief time for Patel. And the difference is, with the first three, you might have disagreed with their decision or their policies, but you had respect for their intellectual credentials. You had respect for their professional achievements. You had respect for their temperament and their character, their integrity. Patel brings no intellectual credentials to the job. He has no relevant experience whatsoever that would have enabled him to do this well. And as near as we can tell, he has no integrity. So it's unclear what anybody would look up to."

Feinberg continued that "I have never seen morale in any organization as low as it is in the FBI right now," from Patel characterizing the FBI as a "diseased temple" to dismissing criticism of him as being motivated by the agency supposedly having a liberal bias.

"I'd humbly suggest that allegation alone has no basis whatsoever," Feinberg explained to Tur. "In reality, people who work in law enforcement and national security are not exactly known for being leftists. These aren't people singing the Internationale and celebrating May Day. I think it's pretty fair to call most of them, at least on the law-and-order side, right-leaning."

Despite these reports, FBI spokesman Ben Williamson argued that the reports about Patel’s performance are political. “The only people in panic are the ‘panicans’ in the media pushing out false stories because they spend zero time covering the record-breaking success in reduction in crime at this FBI," Williamson told MS NOW.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Trump 'Justice': Fascists Celebrate Bogus DOJ Indictment Of Southern Poverty Law Center

Trump 'Justice': Fascists Celebrate Bogus DOJ Indictment Of Southern Poverty Law Center

More than friendly to fascists both abroad and at home, the Trump administration is now seeking to destroy the Southern Poverty Law Center – historically one of the nation’s most powerful and effective opponents of the Ku Klux Klan, American neo-Nazis and other white supremacist movements.

On April 22, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel announced – at a blatantly political press event – that the Justice Department has indicted the SPLC for “wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.” The indictment, described by Patel as “massive” and “sweeping,” relies on the notion that the SPLC ‘s use of paid informants in violent white supremacist outfits such as the Klan and the neo-Nazi National Alliance and Atomwaffen somehow defrauded its donors.

Blanche and Patel went on to assert that those payments -- which over the years amounted to millions – had financed the continued existence of those groups, a claim echoed in right-wing media outlets. In the New York Post, for instance, FBI a columnist wrote that by paying its confidential informants, the SPLC “kept relic organizations like the Ku Klux Klan on life support.” The alleged motive was to justify the SPLC’s own continued existence and fundraising by maintaining a threat from fascist violence, which Republicans in Washington have persistently minimized or dismissed. Indeed, the Trump administration has hired and promoted any number of far-right extremists, especially since its return to power.

The absurdity of the indictment is obvious to anyone – including former federal prosecutor Blanche – who knows how the FBI prosecutes organized crime, terrorism, narcotics smuggling or violent extremism, in nearly every case depending on paid informants. In fact, over the past few decades, the FBI and the Justice Department have relied on information from SPLC and its informants to jail violent Klansmen and Nazis. The indictment also charges that SPLC “concealed” its identity behind false fronts when sending money to informants, just as the FBI and the Justice Department would do, so as not to expose their paid spies.

To suggest that the SPLC “supported” the activities of those criminal groups, as the DOJ indictment alleges, is precisely the same as saying that federal prosecutors and FBI agents were responsible for financing the Mafia, narcotics cartels and terrorism networks.

Under questioning from reporters, Blanche essentially admitted that the indictment’s fundamental claim is baseless. Asked whether the indictment specifically alleged that the SPLC payments benefited the Klan, Atomwaffen or other extremist groups, Blanche admitted that it offered no such evidence. “To the extent that there’s any link between that individual receiving the money and benefits to that organization,” he said, “that’s not in the indictment.”

Not surprisingly, perhaps, former federal prosecutors who have gone after the Klan and other violent extremists were appalled by the government’s attack on SPLC. Former federal prosecutor Doug Jones of Alabama described the indictment as “outrageous” and “pure political retribution” by Trump. Having taken down Klan groups in court, Jones recalled how the SPLC “helped dismantle the Ku Klux Klan’s oerations in Alabama and beyond” in 1981, when its attorneys and investigators secured justice in a Mobile lynching incident.

There are literally dozens of similar cases in the SPLC files.

It isn’t only liberal lawyers who can see through the phony arguments in the DOJ indictment. In The Free Press, Bari Weiss’s Trump-friendly publication, the conservative Yale law professor Jed Rubenfeld warns that “the Justice Department will have a hard time proving that the [SPLC’s] use of informants amounts to fraud.”

More than one conservative has welcomed the indictment as just desserts for an organization whose views they despise, particularly because the SPLC has defended Muslims, gays, and trans people as well as Blacks and Jews. So much for freedom of speech, a value that is upheld on the right only when convenient and comforting.

Still. the most telling commentary on this disgraceful frameup comes not from liberals or conservatives, however, but from the fascist right. Gleeful as they are, the fascists admit that the indictment is nonsensical and indeed view its legal falsification as evidence that Trump is truly on their side.

Curtis Yarvin, the fascist gadfly whose writings have influenced various Big Tech figures and others in the Trump circle, celebrated the indictment on X: “What’s cool is that I don’t really see a strong legal case that the SPLC shouldn’t be able to run these kinds of wacky black ops. That means DOJ is prosecuting the SPLC just because it (kind of) can. If so this would be an unusual sign of ‘finally getting it.’”

And on the "revolutionary fascist" American Futurist Telegram channel – whose authors include former members of the Atomwaffen neo-Nazi group, linked to at least five political murders – the indictment won praise for the same sickening reason. Far from secretly propping up violent white nationalists, they know that SPLC was their worst enemy.

“The SPLC was not funding racist groups to enable their racism — they, in fact, were not funding racist groups at all,” the American Futurist-linked TAF Private channel posted, according to Raw Story. “What they were doing was funding bad actors within groups, with the intention of destroying those groups from the inside.”

The enemy of my enemy is my friend, as the old saying goes – and for the Trump White House, the enemy of fascism is its enemy, too.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.

FBI Probed 'New York Times' Reporter Over Stories On Patel Paramour's Abuses

FBI Probed 'New York Times' Reporter Over Stories On Patel Paramour's Abuses

FBI agents investigated a New York Times reporter who uncovered that FBI Director Kash Patel’s girlfriend was being ferried around on taxpayer-funded flights.

The New York Times reported Thursday that agents probed reporter Elizabeth Williamson in March, following the article about Patel that she wrote in February.

The FBI tacitly admitted to the probe, asserting that “investigators were concerned about how the aggressive reporting techniques crossed lines of stalking.”

The Times noted that Williamson made phone calls throughout reporting for the story, including one phone call to Patel’s girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins.

“The FBI’s attempt to criminalize routine reporting is a blatant violation of Elizabeth’s First Amendment rights and another attempt by this administration to prevent journalists from scrutinizing its actions,” said Joseph Kahn, executive editor of the Times.

The revelation that federal agents were deployed in response to an unflattering news story is the latest mess for Patel in a series of highly publicized screw-ups.

Patel, who rose to prominence by writing fan fiction about President Donald Trump, is currently suing The Atlantic for reporting on Patel’s alleged drinking impacting his job performance.

That suit came after a video of Patel partying with the U.S. Men’s Hockey Team went viral. While he was being rowdy with the Olympians, a man was arrested on the grounds of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago, allegedly toting weapons.

Patel has also been under scrutiny for mishandling FBI assets during investigations and for directing agency resources to pursue Trump’s long-debunked election conspiracy theories.

Investigating the Times reporter for basic journalism is in line with Trump’s actions to use the federal government to attack free speech and the freedom of the press.

Details of this episode are surfacing just before the White House Correspondents’ Dinner on April 25. For the first time, Trump will be attending, despite his opposition to journalism. Other anti-First Amendment members of the administration have been invited by CBS, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and senior White House aide Stephen Miller.

Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr, who used his position to remove late-night host Jimmy Kimmel from the air, will also attend as a guest of CBS News’ parent company Paramount Skydance, which is owned by GOP donor David Ellison.

The Times is a prominent member of the White House Correspondents’ Association, though journalists from the paper will only be at the party to report—not to attend as guests.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World