Tag: medicaid fraud
Promoting Trump's 'Health Care Fraud Takedown,' Fox Ignores His Fraudster Pardons

Promoting Trump's 'Health Care Fraud Takedown,' Fox Ignores His Fraudster Pardons

President Donald Trump has pardoned numerous people convicted of billions of dollars’ worth of health care fraud at the end of his first term and throughout his second term so far. Yet Fox News and Fox Business failed to mention these pardons in 1 hour and 24 minutes of coverage of the Trump administration’s announcements of arrests of health care fraudsters, with some network personalities even hyping up the president and his administration’s efforts to crack down on health care fraud.

On June 23, the Justice Department announced “the 2026 National Health Care Fraud Takedown, which resulted in charges against 455 defendants, including 90 doctors and other licensed medical professionals.” According to the DOJ’s press release, these people were arrested “for their alleged participation in health care fraud and opioid abuse schemes involving over $6.5 billion in false claims and significant patient harm, including death.” Prior to this announcement, the administration had blocked more than $1 billion worth of Medicaid funding to states governed by Democrats, claiming the funds were blocked due to concerns over fraud. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz said that the funding halt was instead part of a “campaign of retribution” against Trump’s political opponents, “weaponizing the entirety of the federal government to punish blue states like Minnesota.”

Fox treated the announcement of a health care fraud crackdown as a hit. “It may be the Minnesotan in me,” Fox Business host Brian Brenberg declared, “but I love the fraud crackdowns.” He added: “There's a lot of anti-fraud stuff going on. I think that's great. It doesn't feel like it's getting as much traction with the electorate as it ought to.” Fox & Friends likewise suggested that this issue should be an electoral winner.

Fox correspondent Bill Melugin stated that administration officials “are sending a clear message: If you put profit over patients, you should expect to be put in prison.” And Fox host Laura Ingraham touted the announcement with a graphic declaring: “Fraudsters beware.”

Yet according to a Media Matters review of this coverage of “the 2026 National Health Care Fraud Takedown,” which came to a total of 1 hour and 24 minutes over four days, Fox News and Fox Business failed to mention that Trump had previously pardoned and commuted the sentences for multiple convicted health care fraudsters in both his first and second terms.

In May, a reporter with the Minnesota Reformer called out this dissonance within the Trump administration when he asked Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ’s National Fraud Enforcement Division Colin McDonald: “President Trump has granted clemency to numerous individuals who have stolen hundreds of millions in Medicaid funds. Can we expect any of these folks to be shown the same mercy?” McDonald reportedly replied, “I’ll take a different question.”

Reporting from Kaiser Family Foundation and The American Prospect on Trump’s pardons of health care fraudsters demonstrates the extent of his protection of these people:

  • In 2021, KFF reported that Trump’s pardons at the end of his first term “included at least seven doctors or health care entrepreneurs who ran discredited health care enterprises, from nursing homes to pain clinics.” The article reported: “At the last minute, President Donald Trump granted pardons to several individuals convicted in huge Medicare swindles that prosecutors alleged often harmed or endangered elderly and infirm patients while fleecing taxpayers.” The article cited Louis Saccoccio, CEO of the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association, who said: “These aren’t just technical financial crimes. These were major, major crimes.” [KFF Health News, 1/22/21]
  • KFF: “At least 13” of the health care fraudsters pardoned by Trump “were convicted in cases involving more than $1.6 billion in fraudulent claims filed with Medicare and Medicaid.” The article reported: “In his first and second terms, Trump has granted pardons or commutations to at least 68 people convicted of fraud crimes or interfering with fraud investigations, according to a KFF Health News review of court and clemency records, Department of Justice press releases, and news reports.” The article added: “In interviews with KFF Health News, two experts on health care fraud said that Trump’s claimed focus appears to be a pretext for slashing spending that was legally appropriated by Congress.” [KFF Health News, 4/4/25]
  • The American Prospect: An analysis shows that “Trump has issued 15 pardons in his second term to business owners, pharmacists, doctors, and health care executives, who together defrauded more than $3 billion from the U.S. government and taxpayers.” The analysis was conducted by Protect Our Care, and its director of policy programs Vaishu Jawahar said of Trump: “His war on fraud is a joke. He’s the most corrupt president in modern history.” [The American Prospect, 4/21/26]

Trump’s pardons have a cost that goes beyond exposing his supposed crackdown on health care fraud as a thinly disguised farce. A June 16 statement from the office of California Gov. Gavin Newsom explained that Trump’s pardon spree “shortchanges victims and taxpayers nearly $2 billion,” because the pardons and commutations wipe out court-ordered repayment obligations.

Methodology

Media Matters searched transcripts in the SnapStream video database for all original programming on Fox News Channel and Fox Business Network for the term “fraud” within close proximity of any derivations of the root terms “health,” “medic,” or “hospice” from June 23, 2026, when the Trump administration announced the 2026 National Health Care Fraud Takedown, through June 26, 2026.

We timed segments, which we defined as instances when the 2026 National Health Care Fraud Takedown was the stated topic of discussion or when we found significant discussion of the crackdown. We defined significant discussion as instances when two or more speakers in a multitopic segment discussed the crackdown with one another.

We then reviewed the identified segments for whether any speaker mentioned any of President Donald Trump’s pardons or commutations of health care fraudsters in either his current or past terms in office.

All times were rounded to the nearest minute.

The Same Politicians Who Invented 'Pet-Eating' Migrants are Yelling Fraud!

The Same Politicians Who Invented 'Pet-Eating' Migrants are Yelling Fraud!

Republicans may not be very good at governing, but they are world-class at exploiting racism. It is a proud tradition dating back more than half a century.

In the 1960s, Richard Nixon yelled about “soft-on-crime” Democrats to get into the White House. Ronald Reagan pushed his stories about the welfare queen driving to pick up her check each month in a new Cadillac. The senior George Bush used Willie Horton, a convicted murderer in Massachusetts, who was given a furlough from prison on which he committed a series of brutal crimes.

Donald Trump’s foray into national politics began by inventing a Kenyan birth certificate for President Obama. His last campaign centered on pet-eating migrants, along with schools that turn children from boys into girls during recess.

With the economy and Trump’s Iran War both going badly, the Republicans are again doubling down on racism. This time, the cry is “fraud,” which they insist is massive in Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in the exchanges.

Not only is the latest round of accusations almost completely evidence-free, pretty much the norm for most Republican claims, it doesn’t even make any sense. In contrast to claims that people might cheat on things like Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), food stamps, or small business loans, beneficiaries of these programs get no direct benefit from cheating, other than possibly getting healthcare provided for which they were not entitled.

This takes an even more bizarre twist in the claims being pushed now by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Mehmet Oz, the director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. RFK Jr. claims that one million people have insurance on the exchanges without identifying Social Security numbers. Dr. Oz claims that 40 percent of the people in the ACA exchanges never filed a claim.

Dr. Oz’s evidence of fraud isn’t quite the slam dunk he seems to believe. According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, 20 percent of the people with employer-provided insurance don’t file any claims in a year.

Since the average period people have a policy in the exchanges is just eight months, we would expect 30 percent of beneficiaries never to file a claim, if its population were the same as it is for employer-provided insurance. But we know that the age distribution in the exchanges skews younger, which means that they would be less likely to file claims than people getting employer-provided insurance. This means there is nothing obviously suspicious in Dr. Oz’s factoid.

But beyond the questionable status of these claims, the question is, who is committing fraud? If there is a fake policy in someone’s name, and they never even file a claim, how are they benefiting?

There are intermediaries who match people to plans in the ACA exchanges. These people get between $15 and $30 per member per month. That does provide an incentive to push phony policies, although it’s not clear anyone will get too rich this way. One hundred phony policies would get someone between $1,500 and $3,000 a month. We would want to crack down on this fraud, but $36k a year is not exactly big bucks.

The real bucks would be in the pockets of the insurers. The average plan in the exchanges costs around $600 a month, or $7,200 a year. Insurers don’t have to worry about paying out much in premiums on fake plans. That means they can pocket the full $7,200 paid by the government. If they have an agent who gave them 100 fake plans, they can pocket $720,000 a year. A thousand agents getting them fake plans at this rate would net them $720 million, which is real money even for a large insurance company.

It’s not clear how big a problem fake plans are, but it is clear that the main beneficiaries are the big insurance companies. And while we can’t expect insurance company CEOs making tens of millions of dollars a year to be very sharp, if their companies are pulling in hundreds of millions of dollars a year from fake policies, surely they have some idea.

This means that if Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Mehmet Oz, and the rest of the Trump administration are serious about cracking down on fraud in the ACA exchanges, we should be looking to see some of the CEOs of the major insurance companies doing a perp walk. And Republicans do know about insurance companies defrauding the government, since Sen. Rick Scott was involved with the largest Medicare fraud at the time when he was CEO of HCA.

Locking up insurance company CEOs may not be the fraud that Trump politicians want us to envision, but it is likely the fraud that would be closer to reality, even if all the perps are white.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.

Florida Gov. Rick-Medicaid Fraud-Scott Will Drag on GOP in 2012 Presidential Race

Floridians are experiencing major buyer’s remorse when it comes to the governor they put into office last fall. Rick Scott–whose healthcare corporation committed the most substantial act of Medicaid fraud in U.S. history–is going to make the state a tough pick-up for the GOP, according to a new survey from Public Policy Polling:

In the survey, 40% of registered voters said Gov. Rick Scott’s actions have made them less inclined to back the GOP presidential nominee next year, versus 26% who said his actions had made it more likely they’d vote Republican in 2012. An additional 34% said Scott has had no impact on whether or not they’ll support a Republican candidate.

A key finding within those results is that almost one in five (18%) of respondents who said they disapproved of President Obama’s job performance said they were still shying away from supporting a Republican alternative because of their dissatisfaction with Scott. Further, 45% of all independent voters said they were less inclined to vote for the GOP nominee after seeing Scott’s policies in action, versus only 18% who said Scott had made them more keen to vote against Obama next year.

“In a state that’s always decided by two or three points, Scott’s unpopularity could really make the difference in tipping the state to Obama,” Director of Public Policy Polling Tom Jensen told Talking Points Memo.

“That’s why these new Republican Governors have been so good for Obama — they’re reminding swing state voters why they put the GOP out of power in 2006 and 2008,” he continued.

This is a key theme to watch next fall: will the insanely unpopular, Tea Party-backed GOP governors in key swing states–Scott in Florida, John Kasich in Ohio, Scott Walker in Wisconsin–seal the deal for Obama’s reelection? All signs point to the affirmative, at least for now, though unpopular governors elected in 1994–the last major Republican wave–were able to hold on when the economy picked up nationally.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World