Tag: white house ballroom
Trump Ensures That His Tacky Taste Will Pervade The Nation's Capital

Trump Ensures That His Tacky Taste Will Pervade The Nation's Capital

The White House has fired all six members of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, an independent federal agency that helps shape the look of Washington’s monuments and federal buildings.

“On behalf of President Donald J. Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position as a member of the Commission of Fine Arts is terminated, effective immediately,” read an email reviewed by The Washington Post and sent late Tuesday by a staffer in the White House personnel office.

The move—first reported by the Post—came as Trump accelerates plans for several flashy construction projects, including a $300 million White House ballroom and a triumphal arch near the Lincoln Memorial. Both would require review by at least one federal design board, and Trump has been cleaning house to make sure those boards are stocked with loyalists.

The Commission of Fine Arts, created by Congress in 1910, traditionally includes a mix of architects, designers, and urban planners who advise the federal government on the capital’s architectural development.

President Joe Biden appointed the now-dismissed group, several of whom were expected to serve through 2028.

Trump’s purge is part of a broader effort to consolidate control over Washington’s two main federal design panels: the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts and the National Capital Planning Commission. The White House already ousted Biden-era members of the latter in July, replacing them with Trump allies, including his staff secretary—and now NCPC chair—Will Scharf. Together, the two panels typically review everything from memorial designs to major changes at the White House itself.

The firings come as Trump moves ahead with his ambitious East Wing overhaul, which includes a proposed 90,000-square-foot ballroom and necessitated destroying the entire existing wing. The president has said the project will be funded by himself and donors, including tech bro allies.

It’s not clear whether the Commission of Fine Arts would have any real say over Trump’s ballroom. The White House has argued that only the National Capital Planning Commission—the other federal design board overseeing major construction across D.C., Virginia, and Maryland—has jurisdiction. Officials say that body steps in only once “vertical” construction begins, not during demolition, meaning the administration can proceed with tearing down the East Wing without either commission’s approval.

Speaking to the Post, a White House official confirmed the Fine Arts commissioners had been terminated.

“We are preparing to appoint a new slate of members to the commission that are more aligned with President Trump’s ‘America First’ policies,” the official said, requesting anonymity to discuss personnel matters.

Trump has also taken a personal interest in reshaping the city’s skyline. Earlier this month, he floated plans for a massive arch near the Lincoln Memorial, though he’s provided no cost estimate, timeline for approval, or design details.

This week’s purge mirrors earlier shake-ups at other cultural and planning institutions, including the Kennedy Center board and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council—both of which saw Biden appointees pushed out to make room for Trump loyalists.

The Commission of Fine Arts has long reviewed high-profile White House projects, including the 2019 tennis pavilion overseen by former First Lady Melania Trump. But with Trump eager to fast-track construction, he may try to bypass such reviews entirely.The timing of these firings is hard to ignore. Trump’s push to remake Washington in his own image—starting with his gaudy, oversized ballroom—has come with a quiet purge of the very institutions meant to keep federal design in check.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

What Are The Actual Plans For Trump's Ballroom? Nobody Knows, Including Him

What Are The Actual Plans For Trump's Ballroom? Nobody Knows, Including Him

The East Wing of the White House was reduced to a pile of rubble last week in a hasty, brutal demolition that shocked the country. Now, it’s time to build President Donald Trump’s big, dumb, gilded bribe palace—but no one knows exactly what that entails.

The New York Times tried to figure this out, looking at the plans—which Trump waved around in the Oval Office—posted on the White House website and a physical model of the ballroom.

And guess what? None of them are the same.

Honestly, of course they aren’t. This is all being done on the fly, subject to Trump’s daily whims. The ballroom could hold 650 people, or maybe 1,350—it’s a mystery! Maybe it will cost $200 million, maybe $300 million. Wait, scratch that—it’s $350 million. Definitely $350 million.

You might find it odd that construction is already starting on a building that has multiple building plans—where one version of the ballroom holds nearly twice the other, with a price tag that increases by about $50 million every time you turn around.

You fool! You rube! You just don’t understand how construction works! Let White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt school you.

“With any construction project, changes come. And we have informed all of you, we've been keeping you apprised of this project. We've shown you the renderings,” she said.Well, yes. It’s the fact that there are renderings plural that is the problem here. All we really know for sure is that it will be 90,000 square feet, or nearly double the size of the White House, which stands at 55,000 square feet—at least until Trump destroyed the East Wing.

Former First Lady Jackie Kennedy’s garden is also gone, as are two magnolia trees that were planted in the 1940s to honor former Presidents Warren G. Harding and Franklin D. Roosevelt. And why not? Trump doesn’t want to honor any past presidents. He only wants to honor himself.

Even the small details are inconsistent in Trump’s plans for the ballroom, including the number of decorative columns and staircases. There’s also the small problem of the renderings having physically impossible features, like a stairway to nowhere and overlapping windows.

To be frank, it looks a lot like someone just used AI to render a crappy facsimile of Mar-a-Lago.

Maybe these plans all look like haphazard, slightly different versions of golden crap because McCrery Architects, which is designing the ballroom, mostly builds churches—not ballrooms. However, James McCrery, the firm’s owner, is a hard-right religious zealot and has also designed buildings for Hillsdale College, the right’s beloved ultraconservative school.

But Trump knows that the companies showering him with money for this project don’t actually care about the ballroom's aesthetics or who builds it; it’s just another opportunity to curry favor with the president.

And Trump certainly doesn’t care about quality. He revels in gilded everything, a king in the world’s tackiest castle. He’s created a perfect ecosystem of grift without oversight or public input.

And what do we get? A comically ill-designed piece of garbage where the People’s House used to be.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Historian: Why Trump Is Obsessed With Building A White House Ballroom

Historian: Why Trump Is Obsessed With Building A White House Ballroom

In an article for The Guardian published Sunday, political historian Jan‑Werner Müller argued that President Donald Trump’s obsessive push to build a grand new ballroom at the White House is about much more than hosting lavish receptions — it is a projection of power, messaging and raw symbolism.

Müller wrote that the project – including the demolition of the historic East Wing – combines classic elements of Trump’s governance style: bold physical spectacle, falsehoods about the impact of construction, disregard for preservation laws and networking via corporate giveaways to curry favor.

The Princeton historian placed the ballroom in a wider pattern of far-right populist leaders who use monumental architecture to claim ownership of their nations, define a “real people,” and leave enduring legacies of dominance.

"For all these peculiarities, Trump’s disfiguring the White House fits into a larger global trend: far-right populist leaders in many countries have used spectacular architecture to advance their political agenda and, more particularly, to set their vision of a 'real people' – as in 'real Americans,' 'real Hungarians' et cetera – in stone," he wrote.

Müller explained that for Trump the ballroom becomes a stage for adulation and deal-making, a place where the fantasies of his business persona intersect with the presidency.

He added that the sheer size, the private-funding narrative and the haste to advance the project all serve to dramatise a leader reshaping the “people’s house” in his own image.

“And while size matters for all far-right leaders on one level (just think of Erdoğan’s enormous palace in Ankara), hardly anybody else would have fixated on a ballroom. Perhaps the reason is as banal as the fact that banquets and catering were one of the few business ventures in which Trump ever had genuine success; more likely, it is a space for unlimited adulation of the president and for plenty of occasions for 'deal-making.'"

The writer argued that the underlying message behind this project is: “We won and now the country is ours.”

Müller contended that Trump’s fixation on the ballroom is less about function, and more about symbol. It signals a shift from democratic institutions towards spectacle, from collective governance to personalized rule. The architecture, he added, is a statement of power, permanence and entitlement.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Lavish Spending On Cabinet Officials As Federal Workers And Troops Go Unpaid

Lavish Spending On Cabinet Officials As Federal Workers And Troops Go Unpaid

The government shutdown has not stopped President Donald Trump and his henchmen from spending cash on vanity projects, such as White House renovations and private planes.

About 1.4 million federal workers are not receiving paychecks because of the shutdown, and many have become Uber drivers and DoorDash deliverers to make ends meet.

“I’m driving Uber at night so I can feed my 15-year-old son,” Daniel Scharpenburg, a longtime IRS employee, told a federal worker roundtable in Kansas.

Scharpenburg shared his story days before bulldozers began demolishing portions of the White House to make way for a rococo ballroom that will cost an estimated $200 million. Trump has publicly fantasized about building such a structure since before he was president.

The demolition work signals another broken promise by Trump, who said in July that the new ballroom “won’t interfere with the current building.”

The ballroom is allegedly being funded by Trump himself and a cadre of corporate donors, like R.J. Reynolds and weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin. Because the project involves a national monument, these donors will receive a federal tax write-off for their contributions.

“We are 20 days into the Republican Shutdown,” Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) wrote on X. “Health care costs are skyrocketing and federal workers aren’t getting paid. What is Trump doing? Building his gold plated ballroom.”

Thousands of dollars have also been spent on gold adornments for the Oval Office and enormous banners featuring Trump’s face that now hang from some federal buildings.

Trump isn’t the only one benefitting from government largesse during the shutdown. It was reported last week that the Coast Guard spent $172 million on two Gulfstream private jets for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

The Coast Guard insists the jets are part of a necessary upgrade, but it has not explained why it spent more than double its initial estimate of $50 million to procure them. It is also not clear where the funding for the jets came from.

Noem has already been scrutinized for using government planes for personal travel and living rent-free in a residence typically reserved for the Coast Guard’s commandant. Noem maintains these measures are necessary to ensure her personal safety.

“We are deeply concerned about your judgment, leadership priorities, and responsibility as a steward of taxpayer dollars,” Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee wrote in a letter to Noem, requesting more details on the private jet expenditure.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has also spent $51 million of taxpayer funds on a series of television ads this year thanking Trump for “securing the border” and defending ICE’s brutal deportation campaign.

Eyebrows were also raised by an announcement that the U.S. government would spend $20 billion on a currency swap with Argentina to help the nation’s fledgling economy.

This could all become a problem for Republicans. Many Americans, not just federal workers, are struggling with the rising costs of groceries and housing. Lavish spending by the White House risks making them look out of touch with those concerns.

It is likely to get worse when tax credits that help 22 million Americans afford health insurance plans expire at the end of this month. In Georgia, home to one of next year’s most competitive Senate races, some health care premiums are expected to quadruple as a result.

Democrats have made extending these subsidies a condition of reopening the government.

Reprinted with permission from American Journal News

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World