Tag: global warming
Trump Is Accelerating The Green Energy Transition Everywhere But Here

Trump Is Accelerating The Green Energy Transition Everywhere But Here

The war in Iran has shifted the green transition into hyperdrive. Soaring oil and gas prices, coupled with the clearest possible demonstration of ongoing political risk, has shown the world the desirability and need to move rapidly to clean energy, even apart from global warming.

BYD, China’s leading car maker and producer of electric vehicles, shows the Trump effect most clearly. Its August sales were more than 130% above their year-ago level. Apparently, they would have been even higher if they were not constrained by shipping capacity. The company is now projecting overseas sales of 2.5 million for 2027, almost 2.5 times the 2025 level. It has plants now operating in Brazil and Indonesia and will have one in Hungary before the end of the year. EVs are now nearly 70 percent of the Chinese car market, by far the largest market in the world.

As I noted before, the shift to EVs is largely a one-way street. People who buy EVs rarely switch back to gas-powered cars. That means the shifts we’re seeing now will be enduring and built on in future years. As EVs become more common, the infrastructure to support them gets built out. Also, more people will recognize the benefits of EVs when they see friends, neighbors, and co-workers driving cars with lower fueling and maintenance costs.

And EVs keep getting cheaper and charging times shorter. This will push even more people to opt for EVs.

There is a similar story with solar and wind power. China has been adding wind and solar on a massive basis for several years. It will add more than 140 gigawatts of electricity capacity this year, an amount that is roughly equal to 10 percent of total U.S. electric capacity. In addition, its wind generation capacity is rising by close to 80 gigawatts in 2026.

Many developing countries are now also rapidly adding clean energy. Pakistan now gets 25 percent of its electricity from solar. India’s orders of solar panels from China increased by 150 percent from February to March. Nigeria and other countries in Africa are also speeding towards solar, with imports from China rising 176 percent.

The economics of clean energy keep improving. In addition to the price declines for EVs, which already cost far less than cars in the United States, the price for batteries for storing energy is also plummeting. It has fallen by more than 75 percent in the last decade. And the rapid pace of price decline is likely to continue, especially as sodium batteries displace lithium ones. Sodium is cheap and plentiful and has features, like better safety and performance in cold weather, that make it more desirable for many purposes than lithium.

Even ignoring the impact on global warming, which would be crazy in this year of record temperatures and devastating wildfires, clean energy would be dominating fossil fuels on narrow economic considerations. The transition was already happening largely for this reason, but Trump and Netanyahu’s war on Iran undoubtedly hastened the pace. Donald Trump’s America may be in last place, but that won’t change the direction the train is going.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack, from which this is reprinted with permission.


Danziger: Boiling Point

Danziger: Boiling Point

Jeff Danziger lives in New York City. He is represented by CWS Syndicate and the Washington Post Writers Group. He is the recipient of the Herblock Prize and the Thomas Nast (Landau) Prize. He served in the US Army in Vietnam and was awarded the Bronze Star and the Air Medal. He has published eleven books of cartoons and one novel. Visit him at DanzigerCartoons.com.

The War Against Warming: Why We Must Fight

The War Against Warming: Why We Must Fight

Even after Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia and Poland, a strong pacifist movement in Britain opposed a military buildup to confront Nazi Germany. It vilified Winston Churchill as a warmonger for pushing one.

“What is it that Britain and France are fighting for?” Churchill asked rhetorically in a March 1940 broadcast. “If we left off fighting you would soon find out.”

Five months later, bombs started dropping on London. Britain found itself alone and teetering on the edge of an invasion by Nazi Germany. And in these dark hours, when a militarily weak Britain suffered frightening losses on the battlefields, politicians who opposed preparing for war blamed Churchill for being a poor wartime leader.

Climate change is a very different kind of peril, but it, too, is menacing our planet with catastrophic consequences for both our natural environment and built civilization. The warnings have been coming fast and furiously for years as the powers in Washington lifted not a finger to deal with the danger. Worse, many denied it is real.

Now listen to Cathy Crain, mayor of Hamburg, Iowa, whose Missouri River town was inundated to the rooftops by apocalyptic flooding.

“I’m looking at global warming — I don’t need to see the graphs,” Crain said. “I’m living it and everybody else is living it.”

Americans are finding out why they must fight. They see the devastating fires, droughts, hurricanes and tornados. They watch towns and beautiful farmland in Iowa, Nebraska and Missouri disappear under the water.

And it’s just started. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration says 25 states could see moderate to major flooding through May. Some will surpass the infamous floods of 1993 and 2011.

Case in point is Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley. When the subject came around to climate change, the Republican pointed fingers at the all-purpose “radical environmentalists” for killing jobs. Now he blames them for allegedly forcing the Army Corps of Engineers — which oversees flood control efforts — to favor wildlife over farmers.

The corps serves several constituencies, but as its deputy commanding general for civil and emergency operations said in a recent statement, “The Corps’s No. 1 priority in its operations is life safety.”

Thing is, for over a century, the corps has been building, building, building levees, spillways and other infrastructure to control the waters. This system is crumbling under the pressure of climate-induced flooding. You could build levees seemingly halfway to heaven with more borrowed money, but in many cases, they won’t meet the growing challenge.

And even when levees — built or sometimes removed — succeed in preventing floods in one place, they can create problems elsewhere. After all, the water has to go someplace. When a levee was demolished in 2011 to save Cairo, Illinois, from a rampaging Mississippi River, some 100,000 acres, mostly farmland, was flooded.

In his previous job as Missouri attorney general, Hawley joined a suit against Barack Obama’s Clean Power Plan, designed to contain global warming. President Trump applauded.

With leadership like this, the war against climate change hasn’t even reached the end of the beginning. Surrender and blaming others is not a winning strategy.

Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. She can be reached at fharrop@gmail.com.To find out more about Froma Harrop and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Web page at www.creators.com.

#EndorseThis: John Oliver’s Classic Climate Debate, Framed As If Science Matters

#EndorseThis: John Oliver’s Classic Climate Debate, Framed As If Science Matters

This moment may go down in history as the turning point of modern civilization, when Donald Trump doomed us by pulling the United States out of the Paris climate accord. Even if humanity somehow survives Trump’s dim-witted decision, the impact of his policies will damage the planet for decades to come.

So today we present a video that Trump ought to watch, if only to understand how stupid he sounds when he insists that the threat of climate change is a hoax.

Short enough for his truncated attention span, It is John Oliver’s classic climate debate –a “statistically representative” discussion, framed according to the actual scientific consensus about global warming, rather than the conventional idiocy dictating that both sides deserve equal weight. Co-starring with Oliver is Bill Nye, the “science guy” and perennial voice of reason.

 

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World