Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Saturday, February 23, 2019

Republicans Vote To Block Transparency On Political Ads

by Justin Elliott, ProPublica

The opponents of a new rule to post political ad information online have opened up another front in a long-running fight, inserting language into an appropriations bill that would bar the Federal Communications Commission from implementing the transparency measure.

The FCC voted in April to require television stations to put detailed data on political ad purchases online. The information, which includes who buys ads, for how much, and when they run, is currently open to the public but is available only on paper at individual stations. Media companies have lobbied hard against the rule, and the National Association of Broadcasters recently sued in federal court to stop it. The rule is currently under review by the government and will not go into effect until July at the earliest.

Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, R-Mo., chair of the financial services and general government subcommittee of the House appropriations committee, added language to an appropriations bill ordering that no funds to be used to implement the disclosure rule. The bill, which passed the subcommittee Wednesday, funds the FCC and other agencies for fiscal year 2013.

The move by Emerson adds another question mark to the process of creating an FCC website with political ad data. At a subcommittee hearing Wednesday, a Democratic amendment to remove the Emerson language was defeated on a party line vote.

“I suspect there will be a big fight in committee and on the floor,” Rep. José Serrano, D-N.Y., who led the Democratic effort to defeat the language, told ProPublica.

  • Share this on Google+0
  • Share this on Linkedin0
  • Share this on Reddit0
  • Print this page
  • 12

4 responses to “Republicans Vote To Block Transparency On Political Ads”

  1. dtgraham says:

    Funny, the Repubs used to concede to transparency as their part of the bargain on election spending. The Dems wanted limits while the GOP wanted no limits but would, reluctantly, agree to transparency. How Citizens United has changed things. Their mouth is watering now at the prospect of them, and their issues, outspending the other side by factors of 10 and more. They don’t even want transparency now.

  2. Lynda says:

    It certainly appears as if there is something to hide taking place with that vote. What are they so afraid of? Big government, little government or no government? I think we know the answer already.

  3. ClydeMcWhorter says:

    impeach john roberts and the three stooges. Wqnder where all the snipers are that were in Irag and afganistan.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.