The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

As the New Year begins, it’s unclear how well President Trump grasps the altered political reality he faces. Indeed, using the words “reality” and “Trump” in the same sentence is a misnomer. One reason world’s biggest fabricator is also the world’s worst negotiator that he appears constitutionally incapable of recognizing the other side’s point of view.
Incoming Democratic Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s plan to pass a clean budget resolution ending the government shutdown dramatizes how the president has put himself into a no-win position. Although the new budget proposal is all but identical to one passed unanimously by the Senate before Trump’s hostage-taking over his absurd “wall,” Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell says he won’t allow a vote on anything the president opposes.
That’s because it would almost certainly pass, which would clarify things considerably. So who owns the shutdown? Donald J. Trump, who publicly declared he’d be “proud” to shut down the government on national TV, and promised not to blame Democrats—a characteristically worthless vow.
So what proportion of the American public supports Trump’s position? According to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll reported by NBC News, “just 35 percent of those surveyed…said they backed including money for the wall in a congressional spending bill. Only 25 percent said they supported Trump shutting down the government over the matter.”
Cue the Pink Floyd music. Even a substantial proportion of the president’s vaunted “base” recognizes The Wall as a dead-bang loser. The only remaining question is the exact form the White House’s eventual climb-down will take. Like the Washington Post’‘s estimable Jennifer Rubin, I’m betting on a modest increase in spending for border security with no mention of The Wall. Trump can then erect “steel slats” in a photogenic position and claim victory.
Few will be fooled except possibly Trump himself. Meanwhile, House Democrats would be well-advised to convene reality-based hearings on border security and immigration reform. Now you’d think that with refugees crossing the English Channel in small boats in the dead of winter, even a self-proclaimed genius like Trump could figure out that as long as the Pacific Ocean and Gulf of Mexico remain in place, erecting a wall across some of most remote and forbidding landscape in North America would be an absurd boondoggle. Not to mention a symbolic affront to Mexico—our ally and neighbor.
Also a potential disaster for threatened wildlife in the Big Bend region of Texas and elsewhere. Not to mention that much of the land required is privately owned and would need to be taken by eminent domain, a time-consuming and costly process. Those are just some of the reasons why just about the only constituencies in the border region that appear enthusiastic about The Wall are “snowbirds” who relocated to places that actually used to be part of Mexico and are horrified to hear Spanish spoken.
Republican Rep. Will Hurd (R-TX), whose southwest Texas district includes 820 miles along the Mexican frontier, has characterized Trump’s wall as “the most expensive and least effective way to do border security. 
As for restraining the drug trade, get real. There are probably more tunnels beneath the already-existing wall dividing Tijuana and San Diego than under the Hudson River between New York and New Jersey. Some have electric lights and small gauge rail tracks. Bulk drug shipments arrive not on the backs of campesinos trudging through the Sonoran desert, but tourists carrying concealed packages, hidden compartments in 18-wheelers, cargo containers on ships and airplanes, and fishing boats retrieving contraband at sea. That pesky ocean again!
The only realistic way to restrain the international drug trade is through legalization and the medicalization of addiction. But that’s a currently a non-starter, politically. So let’s move on, shall we?
Indeed, properly-run congressional hearings might allay Trump-inspired fears about a non-existent crisis at the border “You know what the real problem is? It’s that there is a big lie going on,” Linda Chavez said on CNN’s State of the Union. “We are not in the middle of an immigration crisis in the United States. In the year 2000, 1.6 million people were apprehended trying to get into the United States.”
“In fiscal year 2017, it was about 300,000. Now it did tick up in 2018, and there has been a shift. We are no longer seeing single men coming to work in the United States. We’re seeing families who are fleeing violence in their countries. We do need to do something about the asylum system.”
Chavez, a Republican veteran of several administrations, grew up in New Mexico and like millions of Americans, has relatives on both sides of the border.
Something else congressional hearings could clarify is that nobody’s for the “open borders” Trump rants about. Fear-mongering aside, they do favor practical, humane reform of America’s broken immigration system.
IMAGE: A Cochise County Sheriff officer stands along the border fence between the United States and Mexico near Douglas, Arizona March 18, 2016. REUTERS/Sam Mircovich/File Photo

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Praising Biden, Macron Agrees ‘US Is Back’ Image via @Wikimedia Commons

Praising Biden, Macron Agrees ‘US Is Back’
Although former President Donald Trump and his MAGA ally Steve Bannon have been enthusiastic supporters of Marine Le Pen — the far-right National Rally leader and White nationalist who lost to President Emmanuel Macron in France’s 2017 presidential election — many on America’s right have been quick to bash France over the years, including the country’s economic policies. But liberal economist and New York Times opinion writer Paul Krugman, in his January 14 column, argues that France’s economic policies during the COVID-19 pandemic have been a succ

ess.

“For as long as I can remember,” Krugman writes. “U.S. media coverage of the French economy has been relentlessly negative…. The data never actually supported this negativism. What was really going on, I believe, was that business and economic discourse in the United States is strongly shaped by conservative ideology — and given that ideology, France, with its huge social expenditure, high taxes and extensive economic regulation, should have been a basket case. So, reporting about France seized on every negative development as a sign that the long-awaited disaster was finally arriving.”

Keep reading... Show less
AOC Burns Ingraham In Twitter War Over Virus Impact On Minorities
AOC Burns Ingraham In Twitter War Over Virus Impact On Minorities

We're nearly three years into one of the worst pandemics to hit the country--and the world--in the last hundred years. Even though vaccines and booster shots are readily available, we're still forced to endure a never-ending sea of ignorance and sickening misinformation from far-right psychopaths. Among those far-right psychopaths is partisan hack and terrible human Laura Ingrahm of Fox News. Much like her equally awful co-worker Tucker Carlson, Ingraham has devoted airtime to constantly spreading lies and misinformation about the vaccine, which is pretty odd when considering that her chief demographic is the vulnerable elderly population.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley recently tested positive for COVID-19 Sunday, and CNN reports that Gen. David Berger, commandant of the Marine Corps, also tested positive. While most sane and decent human beings would want to wish the American general well, Ingraham is a morally depraved monster and chose to delight in the man getting Covid.

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}