• Home
  • Congress
  • Headlines
  • Law
  • Newsletter
  • Ukraine
  • White House
  • Campaign 2020
  • Race and Ethnicity
  • Far Right
  • Media
  • Cartoons
  • Budget
  • Poverty
  • Endorse This
  • Agriculture
  • Trade
  • Impeachment
  • National Security & Intelligence
  • Top News
  • Military
  • Healthcare
  • Poll
  • China
  • Health
  • Border
  • Immigration
  • Law Enforcement
  • Democrats
  • Politics
  • Medicine
  • Republicans
  • Aviation
  • Conspiracy Theories
  • Entertainment
  • Investigations
  • Russia
  • Iran
  • Ethics
  • Courts
  • Elections
  • Gender
  • Inequality
  • Taxes
  • Voting Rights
  • Corruption
  • Social Media
  • Economy
  • Infrastructure
  • Authoritarianism
  • Books
  • Culture
  • Government
  • History
  • Uncategorized
  • Campaign 2016
  • Editor's Blog
  • Anti-Semitism
  • Social Security
  • Constitution
  • Veterans
  • Climate Change
  • Diplomacy
  • Business
  • Labor
  • Middle East
  • War
  • Civil Rights & Liberties
  • Religion
  • Energy
  • Education
  • Crime
  • World
  • Human Rights
  • Animals
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Wealth
  • LGBT+
  • Supreme Court
  • Campaign 2018
  • Technology
  • Children
  • National News
  • Memo Pad
  • Morning LOL
  • LOL Of The Week
  • Bloomberg View
  • Guest Post
  • Carville-Greenberg
  • Memo Share
  • Press Releases
  • Weekend Reader
  • Newsmaker Memo
  • Countdown To Shutdown
  • Sorry -- Wrong Number
  • McClatchy Tribune News Service
  • Slideshow
  • Tribune News Service
  • Travel
  • Late Night Round-Up
  • This Week In Crazy
  • Money
  • Lifestyle
  • Technology
  • #NationalMeme
  • Science
  • Food
  • Reuters
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • US
  • Asia
  • Latin America
  • Entertainment and Lifestyle
  • Canada
  • Central America
  • UK
  • Letters
  • Oddly Enough
  • Australia
  • Tribune Content Agency
  • Mexico
  • Deals
  • Narcotics
  • Disasters
  • Guns
  • Transportation
  • National Security
  • Reproductive Rights
  • Nat Security/Intelligence
  • Youth
  • Disability
  • Lobbying and Influence
  • Lobbying
  • Finance
  • Terrorism
  • Consumers
  • Aging
  • Privatization
  • Criminal Justice
  • Activism
  • Housing
  • UN
  • Women
  • Refugees
  • Students
  • Cities
  • Afganistan
  • Supreme Court Nominations
  • Nonprofit
  • Ideas
  • Employment
  • Scandals
  • Gay Rights
  • Income Inequality
  • Native Americans
  • Drugs
  • Weather
  • Judiciary
  • Socialism
  • Urban Development
  • Venezuela
  • Family
  • House Judiciary Committee
  • North Korea
  • Anti-Trust
  • Cannabis
  • Census
  • Colleges & Universities
  • Human Trafficking
  • Water
  • Manufacturing
  • Nuclear
  • Brexit
  • Most Read
  • Trending
  • Mexico
  • Corporate Power
  • Israel/Palestine
  • Seniors
  • Independent Voters
  • Yemen
  • Holiday
  • Population
  • Science
  • Privacy
  • Space
  • Donald Trump
  • Afghanistan
  • Sexuality
  • Syria
  • Propaganda
  • Iraq
  • Prisons
  • Pandemics
  • Sponsored
  • Arts
  • Statistics
  • Rural
  • Protest
  • Jobs
  • Marijuana
  • Featured
  • law
  • unemployment
  • Transition 2021
  • campaign 2022
  • Campaign 2024
  • LGBTQ
  • Civil Rights
  • Mental Health
  • Immigrants
  • Campaign 2021
  • Families
  • Campaign Finance
  • Disabled
  • Wealthy
  • Cults
  • Social Democracy
  • Espionage
  • Scams
  • Di
  • Log in
Support Our Journalism
Donate
The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless

PoliticsNational NewsWorldEconomyLifestyleStore

Start your day with The National Memo Newsletter

HomePoliticsNational NewsWorldEconomyLifestyleStoreAboutContact
Type to search
The stories you want. The opinions that matter.

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter and never miss a story.

No, thanks
Joe Strupp
    FollowUnfollowFollowing
    Top Legal Scholar: Trump Twitter Attack On Comey Could Be “Witness Intimidation”

    Top Legal Scholar: Trump Twitter Attack On Comey Could Be “Witness Intimidation”

    Joe Strupp
    June 10, 2017

    Reprinted with permission from MediaMatters.

    A top constitutional law scholar says President Donald Trump’s Twitter attack against former FBI director James Comey for sharing a memo recounting his meetings with Trump could be seen as “witness intimidation,” while also noting that there is no legal rationale for the president’s claims.

    This morning, following Comey’s June 8 testimony before the Senate intelligence committee, Trump wrote on Twitter: “WOW, Comey is a leaker!”

    Despite so many false statements and lies, total and complete vindication…and WOW, Comey is a leaker!

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 9, 2017

    “I think the claim is utterly frivolous and indeed could be characterized as a form of witness intimidation,” Laurence Tribe, a highly cited constitutional law professor at Harvard Law School, said via email. “The memo in which Comey recorded his recollection of the meeting contemporaneously was not classified. And nothing in the DOJ’s rules or the FBI’s rules barred disclosing that information inasmuch as the conversation wasn’t subject to executive privilege or attorney-client privilege or any other privilege.”

    President Donald Trump's outside counsel will file a leak complaint regarding former FBI Director James Comey's leaked memos with the Department of Justice, a source close to the outside legal team tells NBC News. Trump lawyer Marc Kasowitz will file the complaint with the DOJ's Inspector General and the Senate Judiciary Committee after Comey testified Thursday that he allowed a personal friend to leak unclassified memos of his conversations with the president to news outlets in hopes it would trigger the appointment of a special counsel.

    At issue is Comey’s revelation during Thursday’s Senate intelligence committee hearing that he had passed on contents of a memo outlining meetings with Trump to a friend, who later gave it to a reporter.

    Several conservative media outlets have claimed that such information sharing is illegal, even treasonous or a form of espionage. Trump’s lawyer, Marc Kasowitz, said he planned to file a formal complaint against Comey with the Justice Department, while Trump himself adopted the right-wing talking point today in his Twitter attack.

    But Tribe and other legal experts balked at claims that Comey acted illegally.

    “Nothing in it was classified,” Tribe said. “That decision plainly and strongly served the public interest and harmed no legitimate interest of any individual or government institution.”

    Other legal experts agreed.

    “There was nothing classified in any of the memos or the testimony given and there is no crime that rises from potentially revealing privileged material,” said Lisa Kern Griffin, a professor at Duke University Law School. “If someone wants to voluntarily reveal information, there is no criminal liability.”

    Professor James B. Jacobs of New York University School of Law added, “I cannot see any [illegality] in Mr. Comey’s making public his own notes on his conversations with President Trump. There was no secret or classified information revealed.”

    Geoffrey Stone, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School, agreed: “As I understand the situation, there was nothing unlawful or inappropriate in that action. There was no classified information involved.”

    Samuel Gross, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School, also noted that the claims by some that it was privileged information are unfounded.

    “Strictly speaking, that is a misnomer,” he said in an interview. “If this was privileged information, which seems unlikely to me, then the president would have the right to assert that privilege to prevent Comey from discussing that information. But he didn’t, his lawyer didn’t, nobody did. It strikes me that the statements that are being made have no basis in law.”

     

     

    About The National Memo

    The National Memo is a political newsletter and website that combines the spirit of investigative journalism with new technology and ideas. We cover campaigns, elections, the White House, Congress, and the world with a fresh outlook. Our own journalism — as well as our selections of the smartest stories available every day — reflects a clear and strong perspective, without the kind of propaganda, ultra-partisanship and overwrought ideology that burden so much of our political discourse.

    TAGS
    Created By
    RebelMouse
    ©All rights reserved.
    AboutMastheadTerms of ServicePrivacy StatementAdvertiseContact