Tag: data centers
Collins and Daffron

Collins' Husband And Adviser Worked For Lobbyists Behind Data Center Push

Maine Sen. Susan Collins’ husband did consulting work for Chesapeake Enterprises, a lobbying firm that has pushed for more data center development.

This was in 2025 when the firm’s only registered lobbyist was Scott Reed, the man at the center of an alleged pay-to-play scheme that is now threatening to derail Collins’ reelection campaign.

Concerns about data centers and political corruption have consistently ranked as top issues for voters this year. Now, Collins is playing defense on both matters simultaneously.

Collins married Thomas Daffron in 2012. Daffron had worked as a lobbyist, business consultant, and Republican political advisor. Collins’ net worth went from $250,000 to $2.9 million when they tied the knot. Today, it’s up to $4.1 million.

Collins’ personal financial disclosures filed in May indicate that Daffron was paid at least $1,000 in consulting fees last year by Chesapeake Enterprises. Senate rules require spouses to report any income exceeding $1,000, but not the exact amount. Daffron previously served as the firm’s executive vice president from 2001 to 2004.

Daffron was advising Chesapeake Enterprises when they lobbied the federal government last year on behalf of Hillwood Investments, a real estate development company that is chaired by billionaire H. Ross Perot Jr., a Collins campaign donor.

Hillwood Investments helped build at least six data centers now operating in the U.S., including a Texas facility run by Meta, the parent company of Facebook.

These centers, which provide the computing power needed to train and run AI systems, have become controversial for their excessive use of electricity and water, which has contributed to rising utility bills across the country.

A recent New York Times/Siena poll found that 61 percent of Americans oppose building data centers in their communities. Multiple communities in Maine have now enacted moratoriums on building more data centers.

Reed was Chesapeake Enterprises’s registered lobbyist for the Hillwood Investments account in 2025. Disclosures indicate that Reed lobbied the House and Senate on topics related to “real estate investments.”

Reed is also the head of Pine Tree Results, a super PAC supporting Collins. In 2019, the FBI investigated Reed over a large donation he solicited from Navatek, a defense contractor.

Former Navatek CEO Martin Kao, who is currently serving a prison sentence for wire fraud, told investigators that he gave the donation with the understanding that Collins would then help his company secure millions of dollars worth of federal contracts, which she ultimately did.

The FBI investigation into Reed was dropped shortly after President Donald Trump returned to the White House.

The alleged scheme was first reported by ProPublica on September 22. Collins has questioned the legitimacy of the report and steadfastly denied that any scheme existed. She has also publicly defended Reed.

ProPublica has stood by its story and pushed back on Collins’ denials.

Collins voted for the Ratepayer Protection Act, a bill that would theoretically require large data centers to cover their own electricity costs rather than passing them onto consumers.

Senate Democrats say the legislation is toothless, noting that while it requires state public utility commissions to hold hearings and consider standards for data center cost-sharing, it is not mandatory that those standards actually be enacted.

“It’s just fakery to try to fool voters into forgetting that Republicans spent the entire term trying to stop states from regulating AI,” Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy told Yahoo Finance.

The Ratepayer Protection Act failed to pass the Senate on September 30.

Collins is seeking a sixth term this year and is widely regarded as one of the most vulnerable Republican incumbents facing reelection. Her Democratic opponent, state Sen. Troy Jackson, says data center development should only be greenlit if it has a measurable benefit for Mainers.

Reprinted with permission from American Journal News

jon husted

Backing Data Centers, Ohio Republican Took Over $600K From Big Tech

Sen. Jon Husted (R-OH) has pocketed more than $630,000 from data center proponents over the last two decades. It may explain why he fought to bring more data centers to Ohio.

There are currently 240 active or under construction data centers in the state. The facilities, which provide the computing power needed to train and run AI systems, use large amounts of electricity and water and have been blamed for rising utility costs.

A recent New York Times/Siena poll found that 61% of Americans oppose building data centers in their communities. This backlash has made data center policy a major issue in the upcoming elections.

Husted has held multiple political offices in Ohio since 2001. He was appointed to the U.S. Senate last year to fill the seat vacated by Vice President J.D. Vance.

A review of campaign finance records spanning Husted’s career indicates that he has received $631,284 from companies that own and operate data centers, employees who work for those companies, and lobbyists who represent those companies’ interests. This includes individuals associated with Amazon, Google, and Microsoft.

As lieutenant governor from 2019 to 2025, Husted pushed to expand the use of AI in state and local government, including in public schools. This made Ohio a hotbed for the AI industry and accelerated the construction of data centers across the state.

Signal Ohio reports that Ohio data centers received $2.5 billion in state and local tax incentives between 2017 and 2024. This includes a sales tax exemption for data centers that Husted personally championed. The exemption helped pave the way for a Google-run data center in New Albany.

In the Senate, Husted supported the sweeping One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB), which significantly expanded federal tax incentives for data centers. House and Senate Democrats are now pushing to repeal those incentives.

One of Husted’s first hires as a senator was senior advisor Sean Dunn, an Ohio-based lobbyist who had done work on behalf of Meta, another data center giant. The Washington Sun reported in June that Dunn continued to work as a lobbyist while employed by Husted.

Dunn has personally donated more than $94,000 to Husted’s various campaigns.

Husted is seeking his first full U.S. Senate term this year. His Democratic opponent, former Sen. Sherrod Brown, has put out multiple ads criticizing Husted’s data center record. Brown has endorsed legislation that would require data centers to pay the full cost of their utilities.

Greg Abbott

Greg's Folly: Texas Gov. Abbott Gets Hoisted On His Own High-Tech Petard

Greg Abbott, the right-wing hack who is governor of Texas, probably doesn't know what a "petard" is, but he's now been hoisted by a big one. "Hoist on a petard" is a Shakespearean phrase for a bomb maker being blown sky-high by his own creation.

Abbott's bombastic saga began last year, when he noticed that high-tech billionaires were waving political cash at lawmakers who'd help them build massive AI data centers across America. Sniffing a quid pro quo bonanza, Abbott shoved his way to the front of that money hustle, loudly proclaiming that, by golly, he would make Texas the "epicenter of AI development." Not only did he pour massive taxpayer subsidies into the billionaires' pockets, but he even passed a law making it illegal for local officials to interfere with the profiteers.

Sure enough, Texas is now the world's top location for these corporate invaders — so way to go, Guv! But ... oops. The governor's giveaway is now called Greg's Folly, for the vast majority of Texans (especially rural Republicans) don't just oppose his AI data centers — they despise, abominate, HATE them. And they're now in angry grassroots revolt against the perpetrators, including Greg.

So, hoist on his own petard, Abbott has now flip-flopped from hypester to reformer, comically demanding an end to the tax giveaways he created; he's frantically trying to regulate AI projects he deregulated; and now crying that the rural voice he silenced must be heard.

Sadly for him, those billionaires he courted so passionately are now laughing at him. When he recently commanded all data center owners to report their water usage to him, more than 70 percent simply ignored the petty tyrant.

Corporate Data Centers + NDAs = Secret Government

A West Texas cowboy saying advises: "Never sign nothing by neon."

But that's exactly the key operational method of the AI data center hucksters who're foisting their exploitative, multibillion-dollar scams on local folks all across America. Corporate slicks for outfits like Amazon, Meta, OpenAI and Google are slithering through the countryside, luring locals to surrender land, water, electric power and democratic rights to profiteering billionaires who promise pie-in-the-sky prosperity.

The deals are typically cut in the dim light of secret meetings, where corporate lawyers whisper to bedazzled local officials: "Just sign here, cowboy." The key to this mass deception is a legalistic corporate contrivance called an NDA (non-disclosure agreement). It allows data center owners and a small group of insiders to "negotiate" a raw deal for area residents by hiding essential details from the public. Details like: Who pays, how much, who profits, what are the side effects, who's responsible for damages ... and why the hell is this room so dark?

These NDAs even have corporate code names like "Project Lightning." What's the rush? As one opponent of a Louisiana rush job said, "We live here. We want to know how it impacts us." The inside schemers pushing that deal clucked sympathetically, winked at each other, then assured bothersome locals that "an independent study" had shown the proposed data center would cause no harm. However, the profiteers said the study itself could not be released for public review. Why? Because the developer had covered it with an NDA.

Government by corporate-imposed secrecy is totalitarianism. Didn't "We the People" have an armed revolution against that 250 years ago?

Jim Hightower is an author, public speaker, radio commentator and former Texas Railroad Commissioner.

We Have Seen -- And Defeated -- The Plutocratic Enemies Of Equal Rights Before

We Have Seen -- And Defeated -- The Plutocratic Enemies Of Equal Rights Before

Growing up, I received a wealth of working-class values from my parents, including this nugget about egalitarianism: "Nobody is better than you," they said, "and you're no better than anybody else."

That's the ethical underpinning for "We're all in this together" — it's what Thomas Jefferson enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and it's what Lincoln consecrated in his Gettysburg address; it's in our own pledge of allegiance to "liberty and justice for all;" it's what the Statue of Liberty welcomes; it's Woody Guthrie's anthem to the Common Good; and ... well, it's AMERICA!

Unless, of course, you're Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, or other far-out, plutocratic supremacists who do indeed consider themselves better than the rest of us. For this ilk of technocratic elites, government's role is not to promote the Common Good, but to protect their wealth from the Common Good.

Their grandiose sense of self-esteem is as silly as it is dangerous, but it is not new and we commoners have risen up many times in our history to beat down such crushing arrogance. For example, John C. Calhoun, a venerated "statesman" of the mid-1800s, led a national crusade to convert all workers to slave laborers owned by moneyed masters. In the Civil War, a family of profiteering bankers got one of their sons exempted from duty in the Union Army by asserting, "There are plenty of lives less valuable" than his. Then, in the 1920s, a prominent, anti-woke academic proclaimed that races are inherently unequal, so "democracy is an unrealizable absurdity."

This is the legacy of moral and political failure that Musk, Thiel, et al are trying to ride to victory today.

Seizing Our Communities To Erect Data Centers

Communities across America are literally under siege by secretive data center powers intent on seizing our land, water, electric grid and even our local democracy — that's when you're grateful to have a president who'll stand with you, fighting for the people's rights!

Let's hope we can get one of those sometime soon.

Instead, we're now stuck with a wholly corporatized, pusillanimous president who is waving the flag of surrender at AI data center invaders. Worse, America's self-proclaimed supreme leader is publicly mocking the gutsy local groups — of all political stripes — who are daring to oppose the global technocratic order being devised by Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg and a handful of other billionaire profiteers.

The president of our people's republic recently belittled the millions of grassroots democracy rebels who oppose the robber barons' Brave New World. He pompously sneered that the only reason that they don't want data centers is "they want to end up being backwards and poor."

Wow! Keen insight, Mr. President!

He even proposes an AI monarchy: If your communities "want to be successful and rich," he says, "let data reign." Reign? Yes, a U.S. president has actually declared that artificial intelligence should rule over us, meaning that Musk, Bezos and other royal billionaires who own AI will rule.

Trump & Company warn that if you, democracy rebels, "Kill the Golden Goose, you will only have yourselves to blame." But perhaps he doesn't realize that the Golden Goose is a fable — a self-laudatory myth. "Golden Eggs" are not laid by a goose, but by humanity, communities working together and investing in the Common Good.

Jim Hightower is an author, public speaker, radio commentator and former Texas Railroad Commissioner.


Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World