Tag: international court of justice
UN Court Rules Antarctic Whaling By Japan Illegal, Orders Halt

UN Court Rules Antarctic Whaling By Japan Illegal, Orders Halt

By Carol J. Williams, Los Angeles Times

The United Nations’ highest court on Monday ruled that Japan’s Antarctic whaling operations are not for “scientific purposes” as Tokyo claims and ordered an immediate halt to the practice.

In a 12-4 ruling, the International Court of Justice said Japan failed to demonstrate during a three-week trial last year that its claimed right to harvest about 1,000 whales each year was for scientific research.

“The evidence does not establish that the program’s design and implementation are reasonable in relation to achieving its stated objectives,” the court’s presiding judge, Peter Tomka, read from the ruling. The court ordered Japan to cease its whaling operations in the Southern Ocean “with immediate effect.”

Australia lodged a complaint against Japan in 2010, accusing it of skirting the 1986 International Whaling Commission ban on killing the mammals by cloaking its operations “in the lab coat of science.” Of the 14,410 whales harvested for research purposes under the ban’s exclusions since it went into effect 28 years ago, about 95 percent were killed by Japanese whaling crews, Australia said in its court filings. Prior to the ban, about 2,100 whales were killed for scientific research purposes in a 34-year period during which such statistics were kept, the court documents said.

During the trial last June, Japan presented only two scientific reports based on the harpooning of 3,600 minke whales and a handful of fin whales during a seven-year period.

In a statement submitted to the court after its ruling, a Japanese government spokesman said Japan was “disappointed and regrets” the decision that its program does not meet the criteria for whaling for scientific purposes. But the government will comply with the court ruling, the statement said.

The U.N. court’s ruling was cheered by environmentalists and animal rights advocates worldwide, even though the halt to Japan’s Antarctic operations may be temporary and the ruling doesn’t constrain its smaller Pacific whaling fleet. The international court left open the possibility of Japan revising its scientific whaling program, known as JARPA II, to conform with the whaling commission ban’s exclusions criteria or to devise nonlethal methods of capturing whales for research purposes.

Two other states, Norway and Iceland, conduct commercial whaling in defiance of the 1986 ban.

“Whales everywhere will be jumping for joy today,” Greenpeace wrote in an article on its website announcing the international court ruling.

“While today’s ruling did not outlaw the killing of whales for scientific research per se, it categorically stated that Japan’s whaling program in the Southern Ocean was not for scientific purposes, and the amount of whales being killed was not justifiable in the name of science,” the environmental group stated.

Monday’s ruling “certainly has implications ultimately for whaling by Iceland and Norway as well,” Patrick Ramage, director of the International Fund for Animal Welfare’s whale program, told The Associated Press outside the international court in The Hague. “I think it will increase pressure on those two countries to re-examine their own whaling practices and the various reasons and pretexts given for that whaling activity.”

Swiss-based WWF International hailed the ruling as fulfilling the purpose of the proclaimed Southern Ocean Sanctuary.

“Protecting whales in the Southern Ocean is essential to maintaining healthy whale populations around the world,” said the group’s cetacean and marine turtle manager, Aimee Leslie.

Consumption of whale meat has fallen sharply in Japan since the mid-20th century, leaving the Japanese government with huge surpluses of the once-popular protein source. Greenpeace estimates that Tokyo has had to subsidize the whale hunt at a cost of about $10 million a year and is forced to freeze and store thousands of tons of unsold meat.

Photo: Mike Legend via Flickr

Turkey To Challenge Gaza Blockade

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) — Turkey is preparing to challenge Israel’s blockade on Gaza at the International Court of Justice, the foreign minister said Saturday, ratcheting up tensions between the once close allies.

Ahmet Davutoglu’s comments came a day after Turkey expelled the Israel’s ambassador and severed military ties with the country, angered over its refusal to apologize for last year’s deadly raid on a Gaza-bound aid flotilla that killed nine pro-Palestinian activists.

In an interview with Turkey’s state-run TRT television, Davutoglu dismissed a U.N. report into the raid that said Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza was a legal security measure. Davutoglu said the report — prepared by former New Zealand Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer and former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, and presented to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon — was not endorsed by the United Nations and was therefore not binding.

“What is binding is the International Court of Justice,” Davutoglu said. “This is what we are saying: let the International Court of Justice decide.”

“We are starting the necessary legal procedures this coming week,” he said.

But Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon said his country has nothing to apologize for and that it has done all it could to avoid a crisis with Turkey. He said the Turks apparently intended to raise tensions with Israel for its own reasons.

“The problem here is on the Turkish side. … They were not ready for a compromise and kept raising the threshold,” Ayalon said on Israeli TV Saturday. “I think we need to say to the Turks: as far as we are concerned, this saga is behind us. Now we need to cooperate. Lack of cooperation harms not only us, but Turkey as well.”

Davutoglu said the U.N. report released Friday contradicted an earlier report on the Gaza flotilla incident which found that Israeli forces violated international law when they raided the flotilla. That report was prepared in September by three human rights experts appointed by the U.N.’s top human rights body.

He also warned Israel that it risks alienation among Arab nations by resisting an apology.

“If Israel persists with its current position, the Arab spring will give rise to a strong Israel opposition as well as the debate on the authoritarian regimes,” Davutoglu said.

On Friday, Turkey downgraded its diplomatic ties with Israel to the level of second secretary and gave the ambassador and other high-level diplomats until Wednesday to leave the country. In other measures against Israel, Turkey suspended military agreements, promised to back legal actions against Israel by the raid victims’ families, and vowed to take steps to ensure freedom to navigate in the eastern Mediterranean.

Turkish officials refused to elaborate on their government’s latest move, but some analysts suggested Turkey could send navy vessels to escort aid ships in the future.

Turkey’s main opposition party on Friday warned that such a step could lead to confrontation between Turkish and Israeli forces. “The probability that (Turkey’s ruling) party has carried Turkey to the brink of a hot conflict is saddening and unacceptable,” said Faruk Logoglu, a deputy chairman of the opposition Republican People’s Party.

On Saturday, Ban urged Turkey and Israel to mend ties for the good of the Middle East peace process. “I sincerely hope that Israel and Turkey will improve their relationship,” Ban told reporters during a visit to Australia.

“Both countries are very important countries in the region and their improved relationship — normal relationship — will be very important in addressing all the situations in the Middle East, including the Middle East peace process,” he said, referring to a negotiated Palestinian-Israeli peace pact.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s spokesman said the U.N. committee’s report concluded that Israel had acted within its rights and said he hoped it would help “put the relationship between Jerusalem and Ankara back on the right track.”

“The U.N. commission clearly states that Israel acted legally in imposing the naval blockade to protect our people from the smuggling of rockets and weapons that are fired at our civilians,” the spokesman, Mark Regev, said.

The U.N. report released Friday called the May 31, 2010 Israeli raid “excessive and unreasonable.” The U.N. panel also blamed Turkey and flotilla organizers for contributing to the deaths.

Israel insists its forces acted in self-defense and says there will be no apology. Israeli officials pointed out that the report does not demand an apology. Rather, it says “an appropriate statement of regret should be made by Israel in respect of the incident in light of its consequences.”

(This version CORRECTS the spelling of “ratcheting.”)