Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Tuesday, October 25, 2016

WASHINGTON (AFP) – The CIA has admitted orchestrating the August 1953 coup that toppled Iran’s prime minister after he tried to nationalize his country’s oil wealth from Britain, according to declassified documents.

The Central Intelligence Agency’s role in the overthrow of Mohammad Mossadegh has long been known, with the coup haunting relations between the United States and Iran six decades later.

But George Washington University’s National Security Archive — which obtained the documents under the Freedom of Information Act, a law that promotes government transparency — said that a secret internal history marked the most explicit CIA admission.

“The military coup that overthrew Mosadeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of U.S. foreign policy,” the document said, using an alternative spelling of Mossadegh.

Mossadegh had angered Britain by moving to take over the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company — the predecessor of modern-day BP. The British believed that control of Iranian oil was vital to reviving their economy from the destruction of World War II.

After taking office in 1953, U.S. president Dwight Eisenhower voiced more sympathy for the British position than had the previous administration of president Harry Truman which had encouraged the U.S. allies to compromise with Iran.

The internal CIA history, released by the National Security Archive on Sunday to mark the coup’s 60th anniversary, offered a degree of understanding of Mossadegh’s position and rejected Western media depictions of him as “a madman” or “an emotional bundle of senility.”

While recognizing that London needed the oil, the CIA history said that British policymakers had “little in their experience to make them respect Iranians, whom company managers and Foreign Office managers saw as inefficient, corrupt and self-serving.”

But the CIA history cast the decision in Cold War terms, fearing that the Soviets would invade and take over Iran if the crisis escalated and Britain sent in warships — as it would do three years later alongside France and Israel when Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal.

“Then not only would Iran’s oil have been irretrievably lost to the West, but the defense chain around the Soviet Union which was part of U.S. foreign policy would have been breached,” it said.

The coup allowed the return of the shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who became a close U.S. ally. He was toppled in the 1979 Islamic revolution, with the new leadership making hostility to the United States a cornerstone of Iran’s foreign policy.

Then Secretary of State Madeline Albright, in an effort to mend relations with Iran, admitted in 2000 that the United States “played a significant role” in overthrowing Mossadegh and called the coup “a setback for Iran’s political development.”

President Barack Obama made a similar admission after taking office in 2009 in another unsuccessful attempt at reconciliation with Iran, which has sought an explicit apology.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2013 The National Memo
  • Sand_Cat

    REALLY??? I’m shocked, SHOCKED! I had no idea.
    Obviously, a LOT of the American people seem to have been in that position a long time, assuming even the confession is sufficient to overcome the denial.

  • dxsmopuim

    The move bought Britain enough time to get herself back together AND the threat from the U.S.S.R. was the single most important issue facing America at the time. 25 years later, Iran was pretty much irrelevant to world events, so, F#%k ’em ! We did what we had to do at the time.

    • Alan

      I think the bottom line is our country ended up with a worse situation today. I hope our leaders consider their actions today better than some of the bad ones we have had in the last 50 years

  • BoldEagle

    This whole situation parallels that of the US deciding to back the French continuing their colonial rule of Vietnam even though the US had previously supported an independent Vietnam. But a communist Ho Chi Minh allied with Mao and the Soviets combined with the US desire to get France into NATO to defend Western Europe against a possible Soviet invasion resulted in another Hobson’s choice for the US in the post war era. Sadly, it was all for nothing since DeGaulle quit NATO anyway and France lost Vietnam at Diem Bien Phu leaving the US to attempt to pick up the pieces with the Vietnam war. Well maybe not quite nothing after all, since Europe is now totally free and the Soviet Union is no more. Still, a lot of difficult decisions had to be made as there was no perfect solution available. There probably never is.