Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Tuesday, October 25, 2016

New York (AFP) – A New York jury on Tuesday found Osama bin Laden’s son-in-law guilty of conspiracy to kill Americans and supporting terrorists over his role as Al-Qaeda spokesman in 2001-2002.

Suleiman Abu Ghaith whose three-week trial has been the most high-profile Al-Qaeda case to reach a U.S. federal court, now faces life behind bars.

The 48-year-old preacher from Kuwait stood impassively as the court clerk read out the verdict, declaring him guilty of conspiracy to kill Americans, conspiracy to provide material support and providing material support to terrorists.

Judge Lewis Kaplan said Abu Ghaith, who was brought to the United States only last year after being detained in Jordan, would be sentenced on September 8.

Campaigners seized on the trial as proof that terror cases result in swift justice in civilian courts as pressure builds to close the Guantanamo Bay prison camp.

“There is to be no demonstration by anyone in the court room of any kind,” Kaplan told the packed room after the 12-person jury took just four hours of deliberations to return the unanimous verdict.

Afterward, Abu Ghaith touched his heart in thanks, smiling at his lawyers.

Wearing his habitual dark suit, with open-necked white shirt he appeared relaxed despite having pleaded innocent.

U.S. attorney Preet Bharara welcomed the verdict against a man he said had exploited his position in Al-Qaeda’s “homicidal hierarchy” to recruit a new generation of terrorists after 9/11.

“We hope this verdict brings some small measure of comfort to the families of the victims of Al-Qaeda’s murderous designs,” Baharara said in a statement.

Defense lawyer Stanley Cohen told reporters that he would appeal the verdict, accusing the judge of being “coercive,” and taking issue with instructions to the jury and Kaplan’s decision not to allow presumed 9/11 plotter Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to testify in court.

He said his client was “stoic” and “at ease.”

“He has confidence that this is not the end but the beginning. We think there are a number of compelling issues for an appeal,” Cohen said.

U.S. prosecutors alleged that Abu Ghaith was bin Laden’s right-hand man as the group’s main messenger after the 9/11 attacks.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 The National Memo
  • Chuckl8

    We actually captured and convicted a terrorist without invading a country? That’s almost un-American.

  • agagnu

    I say, run-fell, a trained ape can do that ? /sarc

  • Joseph Kelsall

    Quelle surprise!

  • Barbara Morgan

    Wasn’t his wife one of the family members of Bin Laden that George Walker Bush helped leave the Country 4 days after 9-11-01? He helped them fly out of the Country knowing the head of their family had bankrolled the 9-11-01 attack yet was never even questioned about why he did it. He should have been impeached and removed from office for aiding and abetting a terrorist’s family escape before they were questioned about what they knew about the attack. He allowed them to fly out of the Country when no one else was allowed to fly cross the Country, in or out of the Country not even tourists who were trying to home.

    • 1standlastword

      Oh…well…oh my gawd…it must have been in the national interest of the country to let those high value witnesses go just as it was in the national interest of the military industrial complex and the disaster capitalist to let Uncle Bennie slip out of Tora Bora

      And now we get to provide this horrible man with 3 hots and a cot at the honest American tax payers’ expense for the rest of his miserable life.

  • Carl Strand

    I am so very happy that they Bin Laden’s son-in-law guilty. All they want is to “KILL AMERICANS”. So one more will be off the street and hopefully making “LICENSE PLATE” for a long time to come in “PRISON”. God Bless America. In His Holy Peace.

    • paulyz

      Me too.