Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Wednesday, September 28, 2016

In one of the most anticipated cases of the week, the Supreme Court struck down 3 of the 4 provisions of the aggressive 2010 Arizona immigration law that many have criticized as de facto endorsement of racial profiling. In a 5-3 decision (Judge Elena Kagan recused herself due to her previous involvement with the case as solicitor general), the court ruled that Arizona cannot make it a crime for illegal immigrants to work or look for work. The state was also barred from criminalizing immigrants to not be carrying legal identification, nor are Arizona police are not allowed to arrest someone solely based on the suspicion that they are in the country illegally. The court did, however, affirm the provision that required police to check the immigration status of people they’ve detained if there’s “reasonable suspicion” that they are not a legal resident of the country. This decision could affect states that have similar state-level immigration laws such as Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, South Carolina, and Utah.

Taken in full, the ruling was win for President Obama and his administration’s efforts to block the Arizona law from taking effect by arguing that it impeded the federal government’s power to enforce the nation’s immigration laws. This decision effectively gives the federal government sole power to enforce illegal immigration laws. In his written opinion, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy acknowledges that “Arizona may have understandable frustrations with the problems caused by illegal immigration, but the state may not pursue policies that undermine federal law.”

The SCOTUS decision follows Obama’s recent announcement of his executive order to stop the deportation of illegal immigrants under 30 that meet requirements. It once again highlights immigration as an important topic for this upcoming presidential election–something Mitt Romney may not be entirely happy about as he simultaneously tries to court Hispanic voters and rally up his anti-immigration base.

But the Obama Administration — along with campaign finance reformers who were hoping the SCOTUS would reconsider the the controversial 2010 Citizens United decision — found themselves disappointed today. The ruling that allowed corporations and unions to spend an unrestricted amount on political expenditures, which has led to an unprecedented flood of campaign spending, was directly challenged by the Montana state supreme court when refused to strike down the ban that restricted corporations from contributions to political campaigns, citing their state’s history of corruption. The Supreme Court rejected this argument with 5-4 vote along partisan lines. The conservative judges argued that “there can be no serious doubt” that the Citizens United  case applied to Montana’s state campaign finance laws.

In another 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that sending juveniles to jail for life without a chance for parole was unconstitutional. This decision stems from the cases of Evan Miller and Kuntrell Jackson, who were both 14 when they were convicted of robbery and murder.

The last Supreme Court decision day will be this Thursday, when the highly anticipated healthcare decision will finally be announced.

 

  • ExPAVIC

    BEING REAL

    That should be a message to the rich, elitist, sexist, overly religious, anti-union, anti-stem cell research, anti-evolution, anti- global warming, bigoted white guy American Taliban Republicans.

    Take note Mitt RoMoney and his running mate Marko “the Kid” Rubio, Paul “Yawn” Ryan, or whomever.

    • wow

    • ? ??? wow. You sure like to generalize and throw everyone into one group don’t you? I am a Republican but I am not rich, nor bigoted. But it sounds like you might be (bigoted)

      • ExPAVIC

        Allows Leeway

        Mitt likes to generalize so why not? Just think of the inaccuracies of his descriptions and capabilities.

        One question I have about Mitt is how is a pacifist, non combatant Mormon going to function as “Commander in Chief”
        of the armed forces? What will he do, hold prayer sessions with the Al-Qaeda and the North Koreans? Maybe exchange flowers with them or convert them to Joe Smith’s teachings?

        As proof of his attitude towards war, Mitt Romney spent the late sixties in Le Havre, France, passing out condoms to street hookers and trying to convert them to Mormonism. Incidently, this writer was in “fighting for his country” in Vietnam while Mitt was sampling the goodies in France.

        • edwardw69

          I too was in Vietnam while Mr. Romney was spending years making his two converts. (Yes, two.)
          However, You are incorrect regarding Mr. Romney’s pacifist nature: Mr. Romney has already said we will go to war against Iran as soon as the Israelis say so, and he will change the leadership in Cuba. (How do you think he’ll do that? Pray them away? Sounds like another war to me.)
          Remember, Mr Nixon was a Quaker.

          • onedonewong

            And barak never registered for the draft, until low and behold a back dated form was found much like his BC

          • edwardw69

            Who says it was back-dated? Proof, please? (And please don’t tell me Sean Hannity says it’s so.)

          • onedonewong

            Who says?? why is it that anytime Barak has to produce a document it is always found at the last minute and isn’t in sequence with those immediately before or after

          • edwardw69

            That’s some kind of proof? I asked for proof.

          • onedonewong

            You have never heard of Google?? Guess not based on the quality of your posts

          • edwardw69

            Why, yes, I’ve heard of Google. The problem is, you can’t send me the link, because there isn’t one. And as for quality, you make charges and statements without substantiation. And you get paid to inflame reasonable people with your foolishness. Are you paid by the post, or by the responses to your post. I assume it is the later, so I will not respond to your “replies” anymore. If you make charges, give details, which you can’t; however, you won’t be getting paid anymore for my responses.

          • onedonewong

            Now that you know it exists try it….glad I was able to teach you something

          • ExPAVIC

            ONE

            I conclude that you are one f-ed up uninformed, uneducated Limbaugh clone.

            I don’t waste time with dumb peopkle who voted for Bush TWICE, TWICE, TWICE, TWICE….

          • DurdyDawg

            You neglected to include the Russians.. Remember when Mittens told the Nation that our greatest enemy is Russia? Make that two more new wars! Like most hypocrites, if he rules America with religion he’ll allow as much blood shed as is necessary while turning the other cheek.

        • onedonewong

          Much better than a Mooslim who loathes the military, and as insured record casualties every month since he’s been president

          • edwardw69

            What does “insured record casulties” mean?

          • onedonewong

            Barak is a great military tactician and his rules of engagement accomplished his objective save Mooslim lives at the expense of our troops

          • edwardw69

            Ahhh, the drone attacks are costing American lives. Proof, please.

          • onedonewong

            Of course you misread my point but none the less, did you forget about the last strike that caused the locals to kill 6 marines with a suicide bomb?? As justification for the killing of a number of women and children.
            My original point was baraks rules of engagement place Mooslim lives ahead of our troops and that has caused record casualties 3 years running

          • ExPAVIC

            WHAT? CAN’T YOU READ EITHER?

            At last look causalities were all but eliminated in Bush’s needless Iraq “WMD-less” War.

            Osama Bin Laden was dead fish food and Gadhafi was rotting in the ground both killed by forces authorized by the current and future president Obama.

            If you are going to argue for Mitt “Etch-A-Sketch” Romney at least provide facts and not mindless BS.

          • onedonewong

            Whattttt??? Sorry packy the casualties have set new records in Afghanistan every year since barak and his rules of engagement took over.. A simple Google search would allow you to be creditable on the matter.
            Obama had no justification to go to war with Libya, Libya wasn’t a threat to this country and after his meetings with W was a growing friend in the Middle East.
            If you want to discuss the Messiah then make sure you come armed and not your mindless drivel

          • ExPAVIC

            Oh, American Taliban Republican Facts Ignorance

            If you have noticed illiterate one, we are out of Iraq correct? Not many casualties coming out of that Bushie f-up

            We are leaving Afghanistan by 2014, and recently casualties have declined as Afghan troops are assuming their responsibilities. What you want a quick fix for another Bushie f-up?

            Gadhafi did have WMDs which is why our 6th fleet aircraft supported anti-Gadhafi ground forces and drones protected his stores of gases hidden out in the desert. How did you miss those facts hot shot smart ass?

            What is missing are 20,000 Stinger and Strella air to ground missiles which the Tuaregs run off with to the Sudan.

            Like I said you want to discuss things get your facts together which is so typical of RoMoney and his rich, sexist, elitist, overly religious, deceptive, bigoted white phony American Taliban Republican genitalia police.

          • onedonewong

            Yes we are out of Iraq, but that hasn’t stopped your messiah from wracking up more and more casualties in Afghanistan, so many that he has set records. As far as Barak and Joe are concerned they are running around yelling we’re #1 we’re #1 when it comes to US casualties. But mooslim casualties are at a record low…yep that’s a way to win a war.
            No Barak single handedly has caused more causalities than W’s 6 years.
            Those “gases” were from the 1970’s and were no longer a threat to anyone unless a shell rolled on some one.
            As usual your coming to a battle of fats and again your unarmed

          • ExPAVIC

            HORSE FRITTERS

            FANTASY RATHER THAN FACT. IT WAS YOU WHO VOTED FOR BUSH TWICE AND MCCAIN-PALIN ONCE. HOW DUMB DOES THAT MAKE YOU LOOK?

          • onedonewong

            Got nothing as usaul for a lib… all blather

          • ExPAVIC

            VOTE FOR ROMNEY AND LOOK STILL DUMBER THAN BEFORE.

          • ExPAVIC

            Gadhafi a friend? You are not only in error but clearly whacked out too. So typically American Taliban Republican.

          • ExPAVIC

            Your facts are twisted just like Romney get things all confused.

            Gadhafi our friend? You got to be kidding or real stupid.

            Unlike Sadam Hussein he had REAL WMDs not non-existent ones

          • onedonewong

            Qaddafi had real WMD’s??? Noooooo he gave them up after his meeting with W. However all his other hi tech weapons like hand held surface to air mssles are all missing who do you think has them?? Its not our FRIENDS that’s for sure.
            Before you post replies in the future try researching your facts so you don’t look like a clown or Joe Biteeme

          • ExPAVIC

            WASTE OF TIME

            YOU ARE CLUELESS. HE GAVE THEM UP YUR BUTT. THEY WERE FOUND AND THE TUAREGS TOOK THE STINGERS TO THE SUDAN.
            ALSO HIS TANKS OF GAS WERE RECOVERED.

            NEVER TRY TO TEACH A PIG TO SING (OR DEBATE WITH IGNORANT PEOPLE), IT WASTES YOUR TIME AND IT ANNOYS THE PIG.

          • edwardw69

            I am not replying to onedumbdong anymore. I suggest you do the same; he is being paid to incite people–he gets paid by the response. If we all just don’t respond, he will starve to death, or perhaps get a job.

          • ExPAVIC

            LIKE I SAID, YOU ARE CLUELESS. MORE SO A TYPICAL AMERICAN TALIBAN REPUBLICAN WHO SPEAKS OF FANTASY RATHER THAN FACT.

            UNDERSTANDABLE SINCE YOU VOTED FOR BUSH TWICE, TWICE, TWICE AND MCCAIN-PALIN ONCE.

            OMFG HOW DO YOU PEOPLE THINK YOU ARE GOING TO WIN WITH ROMONEY?????????????????

          • onedonewong

            Really and where are those tanks of gas??? Guess in your Bizzaro world

          • ExPAVIC

            WHERE?

            ON THE ISLAND OF CRETE WAITING SHIPMENT HERE FOR DISPOSAL.

            DON’T YOU KNOW ANYTHING? I GUESS NOT SINCE YOU VOTED FOR BUSH TWICE, HA, HA, HA, HA HOW DUMB IS THAT?

          • onedonewong

            They are sitting next to Iraq’s WMD’s

          • ExPAVIC

            HA, HA

            That’s your American Taliban Republican imagination.

            If you know where the WMDs are call Colin Powell who is still pissed about Cheney and Bush making him look like a fool before the United Nations General Assembly where he stated that they existed.

            Also get in touch with Tony Blair ex-British PM who got kicked out of office after siding with Bush about the phoney WMDs.

            Mitt Romney looks like he will fit right in with his fantasy about what good he will do for the country.

            Explain how a pacifist, noncombatant will be a Commander in Chief. A flower child CIC with more fantasy. Watch him cook soup and drive ambulances while the men fight and die.

          • onedonewong

            Phony WMD’s i said they were right next to the WMD’s from Libya waiting to be removed from Crete.
            Explain why a Mooslim was elected and has cause record casualties every year since he put into effect his rules of engagement that place more value on moooslim lives than our troops

          • ExPAVIC

            WTF?

            How do you get record casualties from phased out Bush’s phoney Iraq WMDs search. I thought you were on drugs this confirms it

            Keep chatting and show everyone what a dummy you really are.

            You knew nothing about Gadhafi’s Libyan WMDs you silly clown. Why don’t you fly to Europe and see if you can find out who the Tauregs sold the 20,000 Stingers to

          • onedonewong

            How??? By having more of our troops killed or injured that is the result of this great military strategist barak whoisinsane Obama. Just like you didn’t know that Iraq had tons of yellow cake

          • ExPAVIC

            WHERE DID YOU PULL THAT INFORMATION GEM? OUT OF YOUR ANUS?

            TYPICAL OF AMERICAN TALIBAN REPUBLICANS YOU ARE FULL OF YELLOW CAKE CAMEL DUNG.

            EVEN IF IT WAS TRUE, WHICH IT IS NOT, YELLOW CAKE IS A THOUSAND MILES FROM BEING EVEN COUNTED AS WMD TYPE THREAT.

            YOU ARE A DUMB ASS YOU KNOW?

          • onedonewong

            Hundreds of tons were flown from Iraq to the US via military cargo planes. If it wasn’t an issue why didn’t they just dump it on the ground??

          • ExPAVIC

            WHAT?

            Why waste it? It is expensive. Merely another sign of the stupidity of the Bush Administration, they would have let it go to waste. So typical of the American Taliban Republicans.

            Don’t forget to get your health care package. Obamacare is LAW now. Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha and RoMoney won’t be around to change it.

            How does it feel to have the Supreme Court not on your side, and they were MOSTLY Bush appointees. Wait until Obama gets his three new guys in there. They may outlaw the American Taliban Party.

          • onedonewong

            The law has n0 chance of being implemented. it requires $$$ and there ain’t any coming from congress for this mess

          • ExPAVIC

            WHAT? ARE YOU SERIOUS?

            Realize this isn’t dummy Bush and the gang working here.

            Just by Executive Order, Obama can blank check any action he wishes, plus his favorite hobby has recently been finding ways to piss off the American Taliban Republican idiots, so stay tuned.

            Obama will go through any action required since it also makes Mitt RoMoney look like a idiotic moron which is his normal demeanor

          • onedonewong

            Guess you never took classes in govt or understand the separation of powers. But hey you must have taken the same air guitar classes with Barak at Harvard seeing as how he never took any law courses. Just look at his transcripts

          • ExPAVIC

            WHAT?

            Not another American Taliban Republican Plutocrat political expert?

            If you know so much about government why don’t you run for office instead of some of the clowns the Republican like to pass off as capable politicians? The names Cain, Perry, Palin, Santorum, Paul, and of course Romney come to mind. Maybe when a capable person runs, the party could have a chance, at least better than their current opportunity.

          • onedonewong

            as compared to “all that for a dammm flag obummer, or Joe biteeme or Harry take it from the Indians Reid, or Peeelosi who believes all americans are equal but only she should get to buy new offering on the stock market to name a few of the intellectual inferiors on the Dem party

          • ExPAVIC

            Oh now it is obvious

            So typical of the American Taliban Republican plutocratic anti-everything gang of thieves, you prefer the rich to continue to have everything and screw the poor and middle class.

            The last time this happened in late eighteenth century France, 25,000 persons were given a close shave just below the ears.

            Next?

          • onedonewong

            Yea we’re funny about that we believe that the $$$ we earn is OURS. Socialists like you and Barak think that $$ earned by others is your personal piggy bank. Yea your style of govt has worked so well in Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela, and barack’s home country of Keyna

          • ExPAVIC

            Typical

            Keep up the verbal diarrhea. I want to hear what you have to say November 7th when you loose.

          • onedonewong

            You needn’t worry with todays business news barak is toast. He should do the right thing pull an LBJ and with draw and let Mama Obama run

          • ExPAVIC

            Whoosh

            More verbal diarrhea from the American Taliban Republican anti-everything plutocrats. Keep it up and show your butt cheeks.

            Druggie retard.

      • wow, you are then voting against your own interest, not to say the dems have any special mojo going on, they to are beholden to special interest’s, maybe just a bit less than the repubs.

      • Liberals are oh so Tolerant and when they paint with that tolerant brush of theirs they show how much Hate they have …That and of course how ignorant they are of those they hate

      • I love your hubby, too.

      • DurdyDawg

        Ah, don’t be too hard on the guy, love.. He’s been around too many Pubs who have belittled Dems.. That said, he can’t tell the difference between a good Pub and a bad Pub.. You know, the same way other Dems have made you feel.

    • TheOldNorthChurch

      If a member of the “Political Class” takes donations from any of the Big Businesses and Big City Governments that hire illegal workers (who get sub-rate wages) do they all fall into your group?

    • Jeffrey Perkins

      Pot Meet Kettle. You are definitely the perfect example of irony. You post bigotry and then use the the word bigoted. You should either get a clue and a life or just stick to the old saying about it being better to be quietly thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

  • Good about the Arizona law, bad about the Rights stubborn refusal to admit that Citizens United was a horrible ruling. It will become part of their legacy and not in a good way.

    • onedonewong

      A horrible ruling??/ You have a sitting president that took MILLIONs from China and the Saudis but that was OK in your opinion

      • BDD1951

        Tun off Faux News.

        • onedonewong

          Typical lib to lazy to ever research the facts

  • ChristoD

    I saw the Governor of Arizona on TV this PM and in typical PARTISAN fashion she blamed the Obama administration for not getting an Immigration Bill passed when Democrats controlled the Senate and House in 2009 and 2010. What she convieniently forgot to say is that President Bush, with help from Senator Kennedy and Senator McCain, put together a very fair and bi-partisan plan that failed to pass either the Senate or the House under HIS leadership also. It was balanced and equitable based on the reality that is the immigration issue. The point is, we NEED many of them and their services and labor that only they are willing to provide and should factor in the human element of the issue. The callousness, hard headedness and lack of compassion on the part of those who oppose a COMPROMISED solution is the problem NOT President Obama.

    • Gee You conveniently dont mention that under Bush they didnt get it passed Because of the DEM controlled Congress..far be it from them to let the republicans get any credit for doing a REAL reform bill . Flash forward to the 1st 2 ys of OBOZO and the DUMBS controlled both houses and decided to do NADA except lie and pander to Hispanics ..Now in an election year and with the full knowledge that REPUBLICAN Marco Rubio was going to put a REAL BILL forth >>>Obozo goes around the Constitution and acts as our KING ….or Dear Leader or Sith Emperor ( Take your pick ) and just decides to do it by edict …and you talk of compromise ..Liberals they not only are that stupid but they all are hypocrites

      • edwardw69

        What “real bill” is Mr Rubio putting forth? What does it say–I haven’t seen it. Oh, now I remember: he’s been working on it, almost done, but because of Mr Obama, he won’t tell us what it says.
        He would be the perfect VP for Mr Rmoney–“I’ll fix it, I’ve got a plan; however, I can only tell you what it is after I am elected.”
        Last year, Georgia lost almost a billion dollars in unpicked produce, because the illegals left the state due to the new Georgia law. And all the unemployed, who needed those jobs……well, they didn’t show up. It must be something about working for 80 cents an hour.

      • ChristoD

        Michael, obviously you are so partisan you would want people to think that the Republicans WANT a solution other than TOTAL removal of ALL ILLEGALS, from YOUR US, NOW ! The attitude on the part of the heartless and mindless Republicans, and I am sure you are 100% in agreement, is that they are all felons. Your bias, along with having your head up your ass, is embarrassing. There is one and only one solution that the Republicans want period, end subject. Now go get your sorry ass up to speed on something that makes you look reasonably intelligent, PLEASE.

  • Appears to be common sense.

  • ExPAVIC

    My new posting should clarify questions as to why Mittens should go back to Bain Capital for more of what he likes to do.

  • id say let them become legal in a peaceful way or gov will be sorry later down the road and wish they had.

    • edwardw69

      Many farmers are already sorry.

    • onedonewong

      I say sure as long as you pay the freight for their govt subsidies and schools. Are you willing for them to go to the front of the line for jobs, college admissions ETC??? Cause that’s what will happen under Baraks quota mentality

  • Hey Illegal Aliens and the DEMS and ” Progressives ” ( god I love that new term ) who want to grant all these law breakers amnesty just so they will vote for Obozo…what about all of our returning Tax Paying Heroes who are citizens and all the jobs the Illegal Aliens Criminals will steal from them ? If you arent breaking the law you have nothing to worry about . If you are why dont you go back to where you came . If I go to Mexico and do what you are doing in MY Country >.I get arrested ..

    • edwardw69

      Do you think “the returning tax paying” veterans are going to pick peaches for less than minimum wage? And how would granting amnesty–and giving work permits–give any non-citizen the right to vote?

      • onedonewong

        No the long term unemployed need to be picking or no UE checks

        • edwardw69

          Well, there’s an idea. Get those unemployed veterans out there cutting cauliflower. Get those laid-off teachers, firemen, businessmen, and factory workers out there in the fields. It doesn’t matter how old or infirm or young they are. Get them pickin’ cotton for a buck an hour. And the children? Something around 75% of those on food stamps are children. They don’t need school: get them pickin’. “Yasssa, masta, I’s a pickin’. Please don’ whip me.”
          Good luck with that. Fool.

          • BDD1951

            Thank you.

          • edwardw69

            I am at your service, Sir.

          • onedonewong

            No lets get anyone that has been on UE for more than 26 weeks to do 40 hours a week of community service. Whether its sweeping, painting, emptying bedpans I can guarantee you that with in a month they will stop applying and taking the checks.
            For the crops I’m all for welfare queens being bussed to the fields allowing them to keep what ever income they earn cutting cauliflower or picking strawberries.
            Obviously you haven’t been to a school lately I can pick out the future criminals in 1 hour so they may as well start picking because its the best job they will ever have

          • edwardw69

            You say that I haven’t “…been to school lately.” I teach school.
            And yes, you are correct. The psychopaths among us are born, not made, and easily identified to the discerning eye. Mr. Romney is one. They care only about their own pleasure, and do not understand pain, unless it is their own.
            However, the psychos will not be picking anything, unless it’s the next victim. And what in Heaven’s name does that have to do with the illegals?
            Listen onedongwrong, I think you are a shill for this website. You are paid to write incredibly stupid things in order to keep the argument going. Nobody outside of Alabama could be this stupid.

          • onedonewong

            I agree 95% of all psychopaths become Democrats?? Why because they think society owes them a living a house a new car every year and unlimited vacations. Barak is the poster child for PSYCHOPATHS.
            Sorry edwin I pity the 2nd graders that you teach most are more than likely your intellectual superiors

  • TheOldNorthChurch

    The court decision was consistent with its prior rulings involving criminal penalties being levied by States for immigration violations. What they did uphold though was that in the course of stopping someone for another reason the individual must prove they are in the country legally. If an individual can not prove they are legal, they are then held and turned over to ICE. This part of the bill was upheld 8-0.

    The SOTUS earlier ruling in December 2010 upholding AZ HB 2779, gave the States all they needed to control employment of illegal workers by allowing the States to require the use of e-verify. While not allowing criminal sanctions to be imposed on employers the court did allow the State to use incorporation and licensing revocation as an enforcement tool. Example: If WalMart employed a worker who did not pass e-verify, then their ability to operate in a State would be suspended.

    Another, State bill making its way through the courts is OK HB1804. Similar provision involving criminal penalties levied by the States have been struck down consistent with how the court ruled today. What has been allowed to continue is the States ability to use e-verify for eligibility testing for state assistance programs “welfare”.

    Some “States” will continue to battle this as they can not afford illegal immigration and those “States” that don’t will see an enormous influx of illegal immigrates which will further strain their systems (California).

    Its all quite amazing. When all that needed to be done for the last 35 years is enforcement of our existing law. (US Code Title 8, chapter 12). And what is even more amazing is that this law was a bipartisan piece of legislation.

    • edwardw69

      Why would the vested interests want to change the law when they are making so much money exploiting these poor people? Outlawing the illegals will cost them money. They would have to pay a fair wage. Put THEM in jail for illegal hiring and watch what happens.

      • TheOldNorthChurch

        The real question is why is the “Law” not being enforced. The answer is it will cost them all money – or would it really save them all money? It surely would not allow for exploitation and that would benefit all Americans.

        • edwardw69

          It will cost that particular class of “job creators” money. They would have to pay a fair wage.

  • BDD1951

    Thanks Edward, but it’s ma’am. LOL

    • edwardw69

      I’m old. I always err on the side of caution.

  • eltaino

    Illigal immigration should have been stopped dead in its track in 1492

  • beverly5386

    You guys need to read the fine print, the Supreme Court did not upheld the AZ. Law; read the fine print or let MSNBC; advise you on what the Supreme Court decision MEANS…..STOP REPORTING LIES……THX

  • montanabill

    Check out the frequency of serious attacks on citizens by illegal aliens who had been turned in to ICE because of law violations and then released. The current President and all previous Presidents who refused to enforce the law have American blood on their hands.

  • TheOldNorthChurch

    If a member of the “Political Class” takes donations from any of the Big Businesses and Big City Governments that hire illegal workers (who get sub-rate wages) do they all fall into your group?