Tag: 12 years a slave
‘12 Years A Slave’ Puts Spotlight On Hollywood’s Approach To Race

‘12 Years A Slave’ Puts Spotlight On Hollywood’s Approach To Race

By John Horn, Los Angeles Times

LOS ANGELES — Was it ultimately a race about race?

The best picture Oscar is meant to honor the year’s greatest achievement in film, and 12 Years a Slave had no shortage of supporters before winning the top honor Sunday. But for all the film’s artistry, the undercurrent of many 12 Years a Slave conversations hinged on race and how Hollywood has for decades given short shrift to one of the most inglorious chapters in the nation’s history.

The film’s distributor anchored its awards campaign around the line “It’s time,” easily interpreted as an attempt to exhort members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences into voting for the movie because it was the right thing to do.

The film’s director, British filmmaker Steve McQueen, said repeatedly during the long awards season that Hollywood appeared more comfortable making Holocaust movies than slavery stories. And in her opening monologue, Oscar host Ellen DeGeneres even joked that if McQueen’s telling of the enslavement of Solomon Northup didn’t take the top Academy Award, voters could be branded as “racists.”

Whether or not Oscar voters were motivated by fear of looking racially insensitive, or to correct a perceived historical wrong, can never be known. But one top Oscar strategist said that Academy Awards voters have a long history of honoring movies that take on the subject of race relations.

“Look at ‘A Soldiers Story,’ ‘In the Heat of the Night,’ ‘Ray,’ ‘Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner’ and ‘Sounder,’” said Tony Angellotti, reeling off the names of films that collectively garnered 30 Oscar nominations with nine wins. “This kind of socially aware vote for a movie that spotlights racism is rooted in the academy’s DNA.”

All the same, two Oscar voters privately admitted that they didn’t see 12 Years a Slave, thinking it would be upsetting. But they said they voted for it anyway because, given the film’s social relevance, they felt obligated to do so.


In winning the best picture honor, 12 Years a Slave became the first feature directed by a black man to collect the definitive Academy Award, capping a remarkable year for people of color in Hollywood. The Kenyan actress Lupita Nyong’o from 12 Years a Slave won for supporting actress, Gravity filmmaker Alfonso Cuaron became the first Latino to win the directing Oscar and 20 Feet From Stardom, a look at African-American back-up singers, was named top documentary feature.

Even if they didn’t win any Oscars, 2013’s most acclaimed films included the civil rights tale Lee Daniels’ The Butler, the Jackie Robinson story 42 and the South African biography “Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom.”

Though most Oscar ceremonies carry a bit of suspense, the tension inside the Dolby Theatre on Sunday night was palpably different.

Would Gravity, an apolitical thriller about a space accident, return to earth with the best picture? Or would Oscar voters endorse 12 Years a Slave, a film that many feared was so unsettling they put off viewing it until the last moment, if they watched it at all? Or as DeGeneres said in her opening monologue, “Possibility No. 1, ‘12 Years a Slave’ wins best picture. Possibility No. 2, you’re all racists.”

When Will Smith opened the envelope and announced the winner, there was almost an air of relief inside the cavernous theater before the A-listers and others rose as one in applause.

“I think the African-American community is glad the film was chosen as best picture because that is a validation of African-American history and the pain and suffering within that history, and the survival of that history,” said Brenda Stevenson, who teaches African-American history a UCLA. “In that way, it does help to heal.”

Stevenson, who teaches parts of Northup’s memoir in undergraduate and graduate courses, said that 12 Years a Slave‘s win is a milestone in part because the award proves that a story illuminating the horrors of antebellum slavery can “resonate with a large audience.”

Made for $22 million (with rebates reducing its final cost to close to $18 million), the film has grossed more than $50 million in domestic release, and its Oscar glory will undoubtedly boost its box office prospects, even though it’s set to be released on DVD this week. Executives at distributor Fox Searchlight believe the Oscar victories could bring several million dollars more in ticket sales.

AFP Photo/Joe Klamar

Healing Starts With ’12 Years A Slave’

Healing Starts With ’12 Years A Slave’

A plea for about a dozen people who know who they are:

Will you see 12 Years a Slave now?

It just won the Oscar for Best Picture. It just came out on DVD. Please see it. I’ll even spring for the popcorn.

You see, I keep encountering folks, mostly African-American, who have decided that they won’t — or can’t — see this movie. Some say they don’t want to be made angry. Others say they don’t want to be traumatized.

I don’t blame them for respecting the power of this film — 12 Years, based on the 1853 memoir of a free man kidnapped and sold into slavery, is the most realistic and unsparing depiction of that evil institution ever put on film. This is not Gone with the Wind. This is not even Roots. This film will scar you. It will change you. So it is only natural that a person have trepidation about seeing it.

But I remain convinced there is something invaluable to be found in doing so.

As a nation, we have never quite dealt with our African-American history — the unremitting terrorism, the ongoing violations of human rights, the maiming of human spirit. Even when we say we deal with it, we don’t. As historian Ray Arsenault once put it, Americans prefer “mythic conceptions of what they think happened.”

There is good reason for this. Stripped of “mythic conceptions,” presented in its unvarnished, un-Disneyfied, unsugared truth, African-American history tends to make African-American people feel resentment, pain or just humiliation for some poor brother grinning and shuffling his feet and saying “yassuh, boss” back in the dreadful long ago. These are unpleasant emotions.

And that same history tends to make white people feel put upon, ashamed or guilty — another set of unpleasant emotions. A few years ago, I watched a documentary on the lynching of Emmett Till in the company of a white college student. This young man, born almost 40 years after Till’s murder, said he felt so personally “embarrassed” he wanted to peel off his skin.

I felt for him. I feel for all of us who struggle with facing this history.

But I can’t see where not facing it has helped us surmount it. To the contrary, it is lodged like a bone in the throat, sits astride virtually every aspect of our American lives, ever present even if unspoken. Ignoring it has not made it go away.

Indeed, ignoring it has only emboldened mythmakers to reshape it for their own purposes, rewrite our story for political advantage.

Did you know the Founding Fathers “worked tirelessly” to end slavery?

Did you know the Civil War was fought over tariffs?

Did you know conservatives freed the slaves?

Did you know they passed the Civil Rights Act?

These and other imbecilic lies circulate freely now while those of us — black and white — who should be the most ardent custodians of this story stand passively by and watch it happen.

I, for one, have had enough of that. It is disrespectful — a sin against our forebears. African-American people have given this country some of its finest literature, its liveliest music, its most noteworthy scientific achievements, its most heroic soldiers, its most luminous business successes, its most celebrated athletes — all midwifed by that trauma we find so difficult to speak, the one we eagerly avoid.

But I persist in the belief that if reconciliation is truly what black and white Americans seek in this great chimera called “race,” then the pathway to that lies not in going around, but together, through that which brings us heartache and sorrow and makes us weep. If we could ever get to the other side of anger and humiliation, reach the far shore of embarrassment and guilt, what might we then find? Who might we then become?

This country has never truly committed to finding an answer to that question. But 12 Years a Slave provides an excellent place to start.

(Leonard Pitts is a columnist for The Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla., 33132. Readers may contact him via email at lpitts@miamiherald.com.)

Photo: Cornerhouse Manchester via Flickr

Steve McQueen Has Tirelessly Promoted ’12 Years A Slave’

Steve McQueen Has Tirelessly Promoted ’12 Years A Slave’

By John Horn, Los Angeles Times

LOS ANGELES — Not long after Steve McQueen’s 12 Years a Slave premiered at the Telluride Film Festival last August, a friend cautioned the British director that his movie was “more important than you.”

It turned out to be far truer than anyone, including McQueen, might have guessed.

Nearly half a year after McQueen’s searing retelling of the 1841 enslavement of Solomon Northup was first shown to moviegoers, 12 Years a Slave remains the year’s hot-button movie, with McQueen the thoughtful and sometimes stubborn voice at the center of the conversation.

“I feel I have to be the spokesman for the movie, and I feel I have to put myself out there,” McQueen said. “Yes, I have to sacrifice a bit of my family, too. And they understand that.”

No matter how long and enthusiastically people talk about Gravity or American Hustle, the context of the discussion rarely transcends Alfonso Cuaron and David O. Russell’s storytelling artistry. But like fellow best picture nominees Philomena and Dallas Buyers Club, McQueen’s film, based on a real life and real issues, focuses on a subject with teeth and staying power. Notwithstanding its period setting, the subject underlying 12 Years a Slave sparks soul-searching about race, complicity and reconciliation.

McQueen’s passion for the topic not only fueled his desire to make the independently financed film but also has sustained him through the seemingly endless awards season, which now stretches from Labor Day to March 2, when the Oscars are finally handed out. What might be a burden to some, in other words, has become for McQueen an opportunity to participate in thoughtful salons around the globe.

Since its initial showing, the 44-year-old filmmaker has crisscrossed the planet to support and discuss his film, a powerful and often difficult-to-watch account of how Northup was drugged, kidnapped and sold and bartered to a series of slave owners, culminating in an overseer so inhumane his name — Epps — is still to this day Southern shorthand for ruthless behavior.

McQueen’s efforts have yielded not only surprisingly strong box office returns of more than $110 million globally but also nine Oscar nominations, including one for director.

All of that comes at a price: It’s cost McQueen the chance to develop another movie and, among the missed family milestones, being with his daughter in Amsterdam on her 15th birthday.

But as the British director said with no evident weariness or regret, “It’s been extraordinarily rewarding.”

One of the unfortunate paradoxes of the Academy Awards season is that it effectively takes the year’s most celebrated filmmakers and, owing to the promotional necessities of awards campaigning, sticks them on the sidelines for half a year as they talk up their movies. Some writers and directors try to work in off hours, only to find their creative energy has been swallowed in the maw of festival premieres and awards dinners.

“It’s kind of all-consuming, to be honest,” said McQueen, who in the last six years directed the features Shame and Hunger, in addition to numerous videos and short films. “You can’t really focus.”

For McQueen, the potential pain of not being able to return to work has been more than offset by the exchanges around his film. A woman from Kenya recounted at a screening at the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles how she had been sold into slavery in Abu Dhabi, and at a premiere in New Orleans the director candidly shared his own feelings of recognizing as a young child the particular shame of slavery for people who are black.

“It’s just so stimulating,” McQueen said in an interview conducted for KCRW’s The Business. “So it never gets particularly tiring. Because you are talking about something which is as relevant today as yesterday.”

The neck-and-neck nature of this year’s best picture race — 12 Years a Slave, Gravity and American Hustle all are considered potential victors for the top Oscar — has meant that the people behind the three films have missed few opportunities to tout their work.

Because Fox Searchlight, the distributor of 12 Years a Slave, can’t match the big-studio advertising blitzes behind Warner Bros.’ Gravity and Sony’s American Hustle, much of its marketing has hinged on personal appearances by McQueen and his actors Chiwetel Ejiofor and Lupita Nyong’o.

“We don’t have a lot of money,” McQueen said. But the publicity generated by 12 Years a Slave’s Oscar nominations, which trail only Gravity for the most this year, has helped bring people into theaters, a difficult task given how graphic the film is.

“This helps us tremendously in getting people to see the movie, in getting people to talk about the movie,” McQueen said. “But we’ve been very lucky that we’ve come this far. It is gratifying when you don’t have the funds that other people have.”

McQueen, who recently became a patron of the long-standing human rights organization Anti-Slavery International, is particularly pleased that the memoir upon which he and screenwriter John Ridley based 12 Years a Slave has been a bestseller for months.

He believes that the film’s success will pave the way for other, seemingly risky productions. (McQueen’s film, like the best picture nominees HerAmerican Hustle, Dallas Buyers ClubThe Wolf of Wall Street and Philomena, was financed outside the studio system.)

“I so hope that the studios understand that people want to see challenging films — films that are not sort of blockbusters,” McQueen said. “I wish that they could understand that they can actually make money. And that will be so healthy. Come on, guys, it makes sense.”

While McQueen would obviously like to see 12 Years a Slave walk away with a lot of hardware at the Oscar ceremony, for now he’s grateful that the film has prompted talk about slavery and race.

“It can change people’s lives, change people’s perspectives. Art — movies — can actually do that. Crazy, but true,” McQueen said. “It’s been actually extraordinarily rewarding talking to people. Having these kinds of passionate debates about where we are now, where we want to be in the future, and who and what we are as a society.”

At McQueen’s urging, Fox Searchlight will soon announce a partnership with Penguin Books and the National School Boards Assn. to send DVDs of 12 Years a Slave and copies of Northup’s memoir to every public high school library — more than 30,000 campuses — in the United States. The movie and book will be available at the start of the next school year.

Even if McQueen shows no outward signs of exhaustion, it’s clear the nearly half-year grind has taken a toll.

“There’s been a lot going on,” McQueen said. “I feel I just need to take a break and come back, hopefully, with something that can make me have the passion I had when I was making 12 Years a Slave.

Photo: Cornerhouse Manchester via Flickr

‘Gravity’ And ’12 Years A Slave’ Share Top PGA Prize

‘Gravity’ And ’12 Years A Slave’ Share Top PGA Prize

Los Angeles (AFP) – The Alfonso Cuaron film “Gravity” and the harrowing historical drama “12 Years a Slave” shared the top prize at the Producers Guild of America (PGA), a first for the awards.

In the past six years the winner of the PGA then picked up the Oscar for best film at the Academy Awards, as Hollywood’s prize-giving season moves into full flow.

But it was the first time the big prize at the PGA, in Los Angeles, has been shared in its 25-year history, according to Variety magazine.

“12 Years a Slave,” about a free black man sold into slavery in 1840s America, and “Gravity,” starring Sandra Bullock, who plays an astronaut stranded in space with George Clooney, were already among the Oscar frontrunners.

The 3D space spectacular tops the Oscars nominations list with 10 nods, along with David O. Russell’s stylish crime caper “American Hustle”.

The Oscars, the climax of Tinseltown’s glitzy awards season, is on March 2.

“American Hustle” won the top film prize at the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) awards on Saturday, having already won big at the Golden Globes, where it took best musical/comedy film and two acting awards.

Steve McQueen’s “12 Years a Slave” took the coveted best drama prize at the Golden Globes.

Other PGA winners included the TV movie with Michael Douglas and Matt Damon, “Behind the Candelabra,” the documentary on WikiLeaks, “We Steal Secrets,” and the Disney animated film “Frozen.”

In the television categories, highly acclaimed comedy “Modern Family” and drama series “Breaking Bad” took top honors.

AFP Photo/Kevin Winter