Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Birth control pioneer Margaret Sanger is back in the news this week thanks to GOP presidential candidate and abortion rights opponent Herman Cain, who claimed on national television that Planned Parenthood, the visionary global movement she founded nearly a century ago, is really about one thing only: “preventing black babies from being born.” Cain’s outrageous and false accusation is actually an all too familiar canard — a willful repetition of scurrilous claims that have circulated for years despite detailed refutation by scholars who have examined the evidence and unveiled the distortions and misrepresentations on which they are based (for a recent example, see this rebuttal from The Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler).

It’s an old tactic. Even in her own day, Sanger endured deliberate character assassination by opponents who believed they would gain more traction by impugning her character and her motives than by debating the merits of her ideas. But when a presidential candidate from a major U.S. political party is saying such things, a thoughtful response is necessary.

So what is Sanger’s story?

Born Margaret Louisa Higgins in 1879, the middle child of a large Irish Catholic family, Sanger grew into a follower of labor organizers, free thinkers, and bohemians. Married to William Sanger, an itinerant architect and painter, she helped support three young children by working as a visiting nurse on New York’s Lower East Side. Following the death of a patient from a then all-too-common illegal abortion, she vowed to abandon palliative work and instead overturn obscenity laws that prevented legal access to safe contraception.

Sanger’s fundamental heresy was in claiming every woman’s right to experience her sexuality freely and bear only the number of children she desires. Following a first generation of educated women who had proudly forgone marriage in order to seek fulfillment outside the home, she offered birth control as a necessary condition to the resolution of a broad range of personal and professional frustrations.

The hardest challenge in introducing Sanger to modern audiences, who take this idea for granted, is to explain how absolutely destabilizing it seemed in her own time. As a result of largely private arrangements and a healthy trade in condoms, douches, and various contraptions sold under the subterfuge of feminine hygiene, birth rates had already begun to decline. But contraception remained a clandestine and delicate subject, legally banned under obscenity statutes, and women were still largely denied identities or rights independent of their relationships with men, including the right to vote.

By inventing the term “birth control,” Sanger brought the practice — and by implication, women’s entitlement to sexual pleasure — out into the open and gave them essential currency. She went to jail in 1917 for opening a clinic to distribute primitive diaphragms to immigrant women in Brooklyn, New York, and appeal of her conviction led to a medical exception that licensed doctors to prescribe contraception for reasons of health. Under these constraints she built a network of independent local women’s health centers that eventually came together under the banner of Planned Parenthood. She also lobbied for the repeal of federal obscenity statutes that prevented the legal transport of contraception by physicians across state lines, which were struck down in federal court in 1936.

  • kurt.lorentzen

    Kudos for making this politically-incorrect point despite the damage it may cause you. The truth hurts, just as much today as nearly a century ago. Where we have progressed at least to the point that such topics as sexuality and contraception can be discussed, the driving points of Sanger’s position are as taboo as ever, maybe even more so. The movie “idiocracy” points out the direction we’re taking. Black Americans (not just a fringe) cite race as the one-size-fits-all reasoning behind everything from Cain’s assertion of “preventing Blacks from having babies” to Morgan Freeman’s statement that the reason Republicans want to defeat Obama is “because he is a Black president” – Herman Cain doesn’t count as a “real” Black man because he is a corporate wolf in sheep’s clothing – and the rationalizations continue so as not to dilute the race issues. Population will soon be the greatest problem facing humanity. Our 7,000,000,000 cannot be supported without cheap, abundant energy – oil – that is already in decline. Like it or not, intelligent people are having fewer children as the population of the intellectually inferior rises. How’s that for political incorrectness? I’m not so sure about eugenics. Although it makes sense from a scientific standpoint, it’s also true that we evolved intellectually without deliberate genetic manipulation. Modern medicine has largely taken natural selection out of the equation where essentially everyone survives to reproductive age regardless of their physical or mental abilities. In that sense, if eugenics artificially simulates, or even enhances, natural selection then it may be viable, but there’s also plenty of room for shenanigans. Sanger had the guts to speak the truth as she saw it, and with all the incorrectness she’s pretty much on the money. As the years progess, I believe we’ll see just how right she was. Hopefully we’ll get it before it’s too late.