The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Several pro-Bernie Sanders Facebook groups were suddenly shut down on Monday night in what appears to have been a coordinated attack by pro-Hillary Clinton internet trolls. The online users reportedly posted pornography on the pages of at least seven Facebook groups and then reported them to Facebook, resulting in Facebook shutting down the pages for community page violations.

Several notable pages, counting a quarter million followers total, were taken down during last night’s shutdowns, according to Sanders supporter Laurie Allee tweeted a list of all of them.

The pages were all reinstated by midnight, according to The Hill. But the page shut downs raised questions about the power of reporting pages to Facebook, who in turn uses an automated system to shut down pages once a certain number of complaints come in. During the downtime, Sanders supporters were advised to continue coordinating on the Sanders for President subreddit, where it was suggested that a Facebook bug may have been partly to blame for the page shutdowns.

Nevertheless, Twitter users found at least one instance of a Clinton supporter openly boasting that he had helped shut down one of the Sanders support groups.

The user, Casey Champagne, has since deleted his account, perhaps to hide the trail of digital bread crumbs that led the tweet above. But a statement published by the group “Bros 4 Hillary,” acknowledged that Champagne played a part in the shut downs and was kicked out of the group as a result.

“Last night, a former member by the name of Casey Champagne decided to engage in harassing behavior toward Facebook groups of Bernie Sanders and posted about it in the B4H Facebook group,” it read. “[T]his was not promoted or supported by the leadership of B4H, nor were we immediately aware of this conduct. We removed the offending posts and member as soon as possible.”


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Wandrea "Shaye" Moss

YouTube Screenshot

Just who deserves protection in America?

If you observe the folks this country chooses to protect and chooses to ignore, you may get an answer that doesn’t exactly line up with America’s ideals.

Keep reading... Show less
YouTube Screenshot

The First Amendment reflects a principled but shrewd attitude toward religion, which can be summarized: Government should keep its big fat nose out of matters of faith. The current Supreme Court, however, is not in full agreement with that proposition. It is in half agreement — and half is not enough.

This section of the Bill of Rights contains two commands. First, the government can't do anything "respecting an establishment of religion" — that is, sponsoring, subsidizing or providing special favors for religious institutions or individuals.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}