The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Molly Hennessy-Fiske, Los Angeles Times

DALLAS — Since November, Oscar has been living with his grandmother in Fort Worth, Texas, attending public high school, and dreaming of becoming a police officer.

He is one of thousands of young migrants from Central America who crossed the border illegally and hope to win permission to stay in the United States. He was told to report to immigration court on July 24.

As his court date approached, Oscar grew increasingly nervous. He does not speak English. He could not afford to hire a lawyer and was unaware of free legal services.

Oscar, 18, had seen news reports about immigrants who went to court being issued electronic ankle monitors, about women and children deported by plane.

What, he wondered, should he do?

The question underscores the dilemma faced by thousands of immigrants who have come to the United States in recent months, particularly those without lawyers. To stay in the country legally, they must first face federal authorities and risk being deported.

When they do not appear, judges can order them deported. Since 2009, the number of such orders has more than doubled to about 2,800 so far this fiscal year, according to court records. But the growth has been proportional to the caseload, leaving the no-show rate relatively unchanged at about 30 percent.

They don’t show up for a variety of reasons, advocates say: Some move; others are confused, struggle to find attorneys, or hide out of fear.

“I’m afraid they will deport me,” said Oscar, trembling in his red soccer jersey on the living room couch at his grandmother’s house. “If I go back, they will kill me for sure.”

By “they,” he meant gangs battling in his hometown in El Salvador. One dominated his neighborhood; the other his school.

“If I joined one, the other would kill me,” he said.

The longer Oscar resisted, he said, the greater the chance the gangs would attack him, his parents, and two siblings. A 20-year-old cousin resisted, and last year one of the gangs shot and killed him.

So last October, Oscar paid $3,000 to travel north by bus. He was caught and released to his grandmother after crossing the Rio Grande on an inflatable raft.

Federal immigration officials and courts have been overwhelmed in recent months with the influx of more than 57,000 unaccompanied, youth mostly from Central America, who crossed the border this fiscal year, as well as others who crossed with parents.

By law, Central American youth are entitled to court hearings before they can be deported, but not to lawyers. About half of those who arrive unaccompanied, like Oscar, don’t have attorneys, according to court records analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University.

Of the unaccompanied children who find attorneys, 47 percent have been allowed to stay legally, compared with 10 percent of those without attorneys, according to the study.

The Obama administration has promised swifter court hearings, sending more judges to the border, and enlisting 100 lawyers and paralegals to represent the young people in 29 cities.

Judge Dana Leigh Marks, president of the National Association of Immigration Judges, was in Washington last week with a message for members of Congress: Provide immigrants legal help, and don’t fast-track hearings, particularly for children.

“It’s counterintuitive when you tell a judge, ‘Let’s speed these cases up,'” Marks said. “These cases need to go more slowly because of the vulnerability — the need to be more solicitous of juveniles — and make sure they find counsel so their stories can be told.”

Lawyers say one of the best routes for children to stay in the United States is to pursue Special Immigrant Juvenile, or SIJ, status, which is granted to those who suffered abuse, neglect, or abandonment. Once granted SIJ status, children are eligible to apply for a green card. But the process is complicated, even with the aid of an immigration attorney.

The number of SIJ applicants has more than doubled since 2010, and so have approvals. But they are still rare. Last fiscal year, judges approved 3,434 for all nationalities.

Children who make the trip alone often have a better chance of staying than those who came with parents, advocates say. They often join relatives who have lived in the United States and can better navigate the legal system.

Such was the case with Bryan, 16, who fled El Salvador last November to join his mother, Mirna, in Texas. They asked that their last name not be used for fear they might be targeted by the transnational gang that dominated his school.

Mirna, 36, a factory worker, came to the United States illegally in 1998, walking through the Arizona desert, and has had temporary legal status since 2001. Zoltan thinks her son has a strong case for SIJ status because his father abandoned them when Bryan was 3 months old.

The family could have avoided immigration authorities. Instead, they opted to hire Zoltan and pursue legal status. “I’m nervous, but I also have faith that nothing bad will happen,” Mirna said.

Oscar never found an attorney. He had to decide on his own whether to go to court. On July 24, his case was one of 21 on the juvenile docket in Dallas. All but one of the youth were from Central America.

A Guatemalan teenager who managed to hire an attorney was granted SIJ status. Most of the rest did not have attorneys, and their cases were continued as their families searched for legal help. Immigration courts provide youths and guardians with lists of free legal services — when they show up for their first hearing.

Then it was Oscar’s turn. The clerk called his name.


“Is he here?” she asked in Spanish.

Again, nothing.

Judge Michael Baird detailed Oscar’s case and said the court had mailed a notice of the hearing to two addresses on file. Neither was returned. He directed the clerk to check the lobby.

Oscar wasn’t there. He was still at home, too scared to come to court.

“He’s now two and a half hours late,” the judge announced. “I am entering an order to remove him to El Salvador.”

AFP Photo/Ronaldo Schemidt

Interested in national news? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Attorney General Merrick Garland

Photo by The White House

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

The Department of Justice had the kind of pro-police reform week that doesn't happen every year. In a seven-day period, Attorney General Merrick Garland announced a ban on chokeholds and no-knock warrants, an overhaul on how to handle law enforcement oversight deals, and a promise to make sure the Justice Department wasn't funding agencies that engage in racial discrimination.

Keep reading... Show less

FBI Director Faces Sharp New Scrutiny Over Kavanaugh Probe

Photo by Federal Bureau of Investigation (Public domain)

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

When then-U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was accused of sexual misconduct by Christine Blasey Ford — a psychology professor at Palo Alto University — in 2018, the FBI conducted an investigation. But Kavanaugh's critics argued that the investigation should have been much more comprehensive in light of the fact that then-President Donald Trump had nominated him for a lifetime appointment on the highest judicial body in the United States. FBI Director Christopher Wray's handling of that investigation, according to Guardian reporter Stephanie Kirchgaessner, continues to be scrutinized three years later.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}